Easter Questions For Picasso Berg (543 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 0.83 on 15 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Bubba2341 (View user info) at 2007-04-07 21:26:43 EDT
User Reviews
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-04-13 20:25:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-04-13 20:24:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Yay ratings!!!
--------
Woo hoo!!!!!
Submitted by Wildman (user info) at 2007-04-08 16:24:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:35:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:30:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
What's an egress?
Sounds like some sort of bird.
;)
************
Ask P.T.Barnum...
Submitted by Zebra (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:32:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
As an obvious observer of your casual post, you are mostly welcome.
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:30:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
What's an egress?
Sounds like some sort of bird.
;)
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:29:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Zebra, your review is the equivalent of a platitude, a trite statement such as, "The boys of today are the men of tomorrow." It is casual to the obvious observer what my post was, and your comments are superfluous. Thanks for playing, though. This way to the egress...
Submitted by Zebra (user info) at 2007-04-08 13:11:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
I think a more effective title would've been 'Easter Questions for Rob "Picasso" Berg,' which reflects the usual method by which to assign a playful yet sarcastic nickname fashioned for another.
Also, I can't help but notice this poor post has been ignored by all but two people in addition to yourself and the intended recipient, so I felt you might appreciate some constructive criticism and an honest rating.
It pains me to see your posts so avoided by the masses, and perhaps a jolt of the old MRR with help garner attention.
As for the rating, since this was merely a copy and paste of a recently posted work with but a dash of sophomoric humour added, I feel a -1 is especially appropriate and certainly not reflective at all of the artists' talent.
'I've seen better' applies, if only to convey the superiority of the original work sans 'boobie, wang' etc.
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-04-08 00:37:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
O-Whore below.
Submitted by Sacrilicious (user info) at 2007-04-08 00:36:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
SavOwhore below
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-04-08 00:27:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Sacrilicious (user info) at 2007-04-07 21:59:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 Jesus wang.
---
As the Magdalene of the Orgasmatron, it surprises me none that you would point this out.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-04-07 22:51:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2007-04-07 22:38:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Waddabout the thang wit da ears???
Bat? Rat? Bird??
---
...it can be whatever you want it to be my friend. :)
I am going to take another picture of it this evening and repost.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2007-04-07 22:38:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Waddabout the thang wit da ears???
Bat? Rat? Bird??
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-04-07 22:04:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Sacrilicious (user info) at 2007-04-07 21:59:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 Jesus wang.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-04-07 22:03:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
haha!
I will confirm that is indeed a boobie.
Everything else is quite open to interpretation.
Submitted by Sacrilicious (user info) at 2007-04-07 21:59:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 Jesus wang.