Eh, whatever...Uber Clusterfuck (1890 hits)
Category: RomanceRating: 1.27 on 120 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Lungfish (View user info) at 2007-12-03 03:07:48 EST
http://www.ubersite.com/m/96393
http://www.ubersite.com/m/97071
If you're interested, you might have to look at those links to get what this is about. I'm not explaining. I'm tired and I'm going to bed.
Sorry about the resolution. Too many damned subjects in the analysis. But I'll be damned if I'm going to redraw it in Illustrator. Eventually, I'll weed out the deadbeats and alters and make it more readable and meaningful. Yes, I play with statistics for fun. And for work. This took about 10 minutes per week for a year. I'm making excuses. I still have sex. Really. Okay not so much.
One thing: Nobody was left out on purpose. If you're not on here, you simply didn't review one of the hundred posts used in the procedure.
Anyway...go Bengals or something.
User Reviews
Submitted by joedaddy (user info) at 2007-12-22 22:26:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
merry christmas dog-breath
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2007-12-22 19:03:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-09-18 23:27:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Jesus this fucking pennant race is getting scary for both of us.
---
I just read this review for the first time. It made me laugh hysterically, thinking about the metsie meltdown. And then I cried. Oh boy, did I cry.
Submitted by Danger_Ranger (user info) at 2007-12-21 09:33:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
merry christmas fuckface. You know the difference between me and you is that I got to buy my kids star wars lego, and you had to buy barbie or polly pockets or my little fucking pony. have fun playing with that homottity dannity man. All the best for new queers. I mean years.
Submitted by Leonore (user info) at 2007-12-06 18:27:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Hey, I'm in there.
Wow.
Submitted by Zampano (user info) at 2007-12-05 17:26:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
A Fey sighting.
Those have been rare as of late.
Submitted by Fey (user info) at 2007-12-05 17:09:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
<blows lungfish a kiss>
Submitted by sideshow (user info) at 2007-12-05 16:39:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Crazy.
So what does the number beside the name mean? Is that just a unique identifier you used when putting names down on your list.....so the first person you put on your list was #1, and I was #260?
That is some funny shit...I almost dropped out of engineering to do statistics, then I decided that in Calgary the job market was better for engineers...
Submitted by Bohme (user info) at 2007-12-05 03:04:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Fuck, I thought I'd at least be mentioned here.
Submitted by horse87 (user info) at 2007-12-04 17:04:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I actually made a list of something other than 'Probable Alters'?
Wooo!
Go me!
Submitted by firefly (user info) at 2007-12-04 15:03:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-04 07:52:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I once wrote a proto-Indoeuropean dictionary.
:(
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-04 03:24:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2007-12-04 00:32:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The best thing about this post is imagining the legions of morons who actually searched that miniscule font looking for their names.
---
Like you didn't, nerd.
Submitted by Fungah (user info) at 2007-12-04 00:33:07 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I found me. My line attaches to the furthest out one. Does that mean I have a huge penis?
Wait, no, no. It means I'm a llama doesn't it?
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2007-12-04 00:32:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The best thing about this post is imagining the legions of morons who actually searched that miniscule font looking for their names.
Submitted by Fungah (user info) at 2007-12-04 00:30:01 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
If I'm on here I don't care enough to find my name.
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2007-12-04 00:11:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Okay. The family is watching Funniest Pet Videos
---
well what you need to there is just get yourself a new family.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 21:59:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I'll shut up now.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 21:58:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm just making things worse. All references to post #92 below should read "post #93." Sorry.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 21:46:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Okay. The family is watching Funniest Pet Videos, and I had to leave the room.
To clarify some confusion, I'll break down a group example. The group is the Consuelo212-Fartman-MidnightToSix-UTOCKIN2ME group, who aren't very well represented, so I can be brief.
These users only rated five posts in the database. Consuolo212 rated posts #16 and 92 with -2s. Fartman did the same, and also rated post #26 with a +1, and post #62 with a -2. Mid-6 rated post 92 with a -1. UTOCKIN rated post #93 with a -2, and post #24 with a -2.
All these users have post #93 in common, rating it negatively, with Consuelo and Fartman also rating post #16 negatively.
Now, other users also rated post #93 negatively, including Zebra, Sico, Bohme, and Stagger. But these users had more in common with other groups as far as other posts go, so they are not part of the same sub-group. Make sense?
Some users rated a lot - like Shlongy and TheUniter, so their placement in a common group is better founded. (They both rated a lot of the same posts similarly.) A lot a people only rated once in the entire database, so they're either groups of one within a larger group, or they're linked to another user who rated the same or similarly on a common post.
Also, again, the number next to the names only refer to the order they were listed in the database at the time I ran the exercise.
Submitted by skrapmetal (user info) at 2007-12-03 21:21:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Namedrop +2. I'm assuming, probably incorrectly, that the numbers are estimated golf scores. I'm apparently third high behind Brdn_Nkd and Blitzkrieg_Bob but I don't have a blank in my username to underline.
Submitted by St_Jimmy (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:52:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Auto me +2
So I'm grouped with bart, huh? What do I win?
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:47:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
look I'm right next to berty. I've always liked berty.
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:42:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:34:24 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:02:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
ummm, i'd like to make an offical complaint.
I'm grouped in with a bunch of mean people. Am I mean?
---
You can be a tad... um... disgruntled, yeah.
---
well fuck you then.
oh yea......
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:34:24 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:02:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
ummm, i'd like to make an offical complaint.
I'm grouped in with a bunch of mean people. Am I mean?
---
You can be a tad... um... disgruntled, yeah.
Submitted by AsshOly (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:31:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
what do the scores mean? im ubersimilar to the Bosh Man!!!! according to the list, but our scores are way different. Wtf, good sir?
Submitted by i_can_get_you_a_toe (user info) at 2007-12-03 19:02:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
ummm, i'd like to make an offical complaint.
I'm grouped in with a bunch of mean people. Am I mean?
Submitted by Lambchop (user info) at 2007-12-03 18:17:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Flack (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:05:08 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Holy Shit. I made a list.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 17:55:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Just gave me a good idea below. At 15 minutes per week devoted, I'll have another post in another year.
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2007-12-03 17:49:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
this would be more interesting using the data from how each user has rated each other.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 17:43:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:41:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
But what does this MEANNNNNNNNNNNNNN????
--------
It means you're TheUniter. Or, more likely, it means everybody sucks and TheUniter, GodChicken, Yams, and you are the only honest reviewers on Ubersite.
Or it means nothing.
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2007-12-03 17:22:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 me.
I'm rather shocked I'm in this considering that I haven't been here for about a year.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 17:16:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
since my *hypothesis* of an...
whatever. I'm eating chili.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 16:59:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by BeforeEmily (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:26:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
What does the order mean? For example, what is the difference between rosemadder (at the top) and Crudite (at the bottom)?
-----
Order means nothing.
And as some have questioned, none of this means much of anything, since my of an Anglo-/Australo- conspiracy against the seppos is not supported. Except maybe by the reviews this post has gotten. Thorpe still seems to be one of the more independent reviewers. Oh well, he's gone.
Hi Thorpe. Hope you're well.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 16:55:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
hookhand, you're in there with method, julsinsane, pandora, and earthcollapse.
Submitted by Wildman (user info) at 2007-12-03 16:35:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
both of my personalities are represented here, and that has me concerned
Submitted by Hookhand (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:46:56 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Needs more Hookhand
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:39:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I made a list! WOOHOO!
Submitted by beer-turtle (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:30:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
AHHHH now I see me listed
YAY I MADE A LIST!!!!
Even though i am not sure what it is for although I seem to think that i may be kinda like a statiscal model of how we rate articles in comparsion to other people that rate similarly.
Just a guess though...still have no idea what it means... makes the brain go hurty.
Submitted by BeforeEmily (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:26:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
What does the order mean? For example, what is the difference between rosemadder (at the top) and Crudite (at the bottom)?
Submitted by monkeyswithguns (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:25:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
sociology +2.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:22:54 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Sphagnum (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:11:17 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
This is fucking stupid.
---
SO IS YOUR MOM
Submitted by Sphagnum (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:11:17 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
This is fucking stupid.
Submitted by Zampano (user info) at 2007-12-03 15:10:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Eh, I'm sure the meaning is there, and a lot of time and hard work into this...
...but I'm just excited I made another list
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:41:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
But what does this MEANNNNNNNNNNNNNN????
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:20:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
mmm you indeed
Submitted by Brdn_Nkd (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:20:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
not sure I totally get this
or care
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:19:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
me me me me me me me me me
me me me me me
me
me me me me me me me me me me me me
me me me me me me
me me me me
Submitted by Sacrilicious (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:19:13 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
mmmmmmmmm..me.
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:15:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Orgasmatron
Sacrilicious Orgasmatron Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle Orgasmatron
Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Orgasmatron Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Orgasmatron Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Orgasmatron Sacrilicious Crystle
Orgasmatron Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:10:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
what posts were used?
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:09:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle Sacrilicious Crystle
Sacrilicious Crystle
Submitted by triangle_man (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:08:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
97.3 percent of all statistics are lies
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 14:07:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:11:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
It looks like I cut somebody out between cakes and bob. My bad. I had to paste this shit together.
----
sparkle_pink
grouped with cakes
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2007-12-03 13:36:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Lib (user info) at 2007-12-03 13:29:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:51:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Crystle Crystle Crystle
CrystleCrystle
CrystleCrystleCrystleCrystle
Submitted by Crystle (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:42:43 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
i liked the conclusionts part the last time you did this. I'm also overjoyed that I'm next to ManicMother and Merlina. good times, good times.
Submitted by Crystle (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:41:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 07:54:06 PST (#)
Ranking: 2
Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious
SacriliciousSacrilicious
Sacrilicious
Sacrilicious
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:36:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Guess who's close to the top of the list!
I question the accuracy of my positioning, as I've had a noticable difference in my ratings over the course of time, going from largely positive with little comment, to largely negative with negative or degrading comment, and the change was not gradual enough to lend itself condusively to data or sampling to achieve a result with a mid-level to high degree of accuracy.
Submitted by BeforeEmily (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:33:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I don't get it. I like, however, that my original account is on there. She was really something, eh?
Submitted by Yozz (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:07:10 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
So... I'm like Habeeb?
Well, that was unexpected. I was wondering why I have this insatiable urge to make colorful, yet rudimentary drawings of suns, bears and shlongy. I feel so funky - and not in a good way.
Submitted by Maddog (user info) at 2007-12-03 12:05:53 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Wow. I'm about a "13" on the Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine. Whatever the fuck that is.
Submitted by MANICMOTHER (user info) at 2007-12-03 11:37:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
WTF is this?
Submitted by rorrim (user info) at 2007-12-03 11:27:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
My alter and i don't seem to agree often.
Cowboys do statistics? I'm impressed again...
Greetz ;-)
Submitted by DreamWeaver (user info) at 2007-12-03 11:19:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
1 as I see my name on there.
Submitted by corn_nugget (user info) at 2007-12-03 11:18:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Everyone I like is in the same major bracket as me... goes to show, huh?
Submitted by darko (user info) at 2007-12-03 11:13:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
In recognition of being grouped with Hidden I think I'll camwhore today
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:54:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious Sacrilicious
SacriliciousSacrilicious
Sacrilicious
Sacrilicious
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:30:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The folks you're grouped with. I really should be working. But I'm not.
Submitted by MudWhistle (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:29:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I was told there would be no math.
Submitted by darko (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:28:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Am I like the people with similar numbers or am I like the ones I'm grouped with?
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:27:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by beer-turtle (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:42:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I never make the lists
/sigh
------
You're in the group with scourge and sacrilicious and Matt-I-can't-spell-his-last-name-without- looking.
The numbers don't mean anything other than that's the order they were listed in the table when I ran the gay exercise. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:18:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
what defines close to someone else in a group? +/- 20? 50? 10? 100?
Submitted by stone8946 (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:08:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm not going to bother reading into this as I don't have the time, a +2 however for my name being there.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2007-12-03 10:02:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
all i know is i'm right next to sacrilicious and that probably means she loves me or something.
+2 for that
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:51:10 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Wordswordswordsnumbersnumbersnumberslineslineslineshooray.
Submitted by LittleMonster (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:47:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Hello lover
Now what in God's name with crack is going on here?!
Speak slowly and maintain eye contact.
Ta!
Submitted by beer-turtle (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:42:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I never make the lists
/sigh
Submitted by BLITZKREIG_BOB (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:41:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Why is my number the highest one? Is that good?
What do I win? Please tell me it isn't a visit from Rad, and a 5 gallon bucket of vaseline.
What sort of posts were used for the samples? I ask because I tend to rate bloggy, girly, flowery, artsy-fartsy, or whiny posts poorly, while I tend to rate humor, politics, nerdy, sports (except soccer), and shit posts better than they should be rated.
Submitted by CaptainThorns (user info) at 2007-12-03 09:27:10 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Who the hell is Herpes and why is he/she below me? :`(
Submitted by orphelia (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:50:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Could someone tell me in simple terms what this all means?
Em your weak immune system is worrying.
Submitted by DrogoRoch (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:50:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:42:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
im really really ill
--
This is like one of them thar comments that really isnt all that hard to believe
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:46:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
shut up you shit face
Submitted by theBarron (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:43:17 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
GOOD YOU RANCID LITTLE PISS STAIN.
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:42:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
im really really ill
Submitted by theBarron (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:39:28 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
RUBBISH!
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:35:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
So im Rob Berg eh! hehe
Submitted by OscarZAcosta (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:34:43 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
oops oh well
Submitted by OscarZAcosta (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:33:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
so im Rob Berg?? oh
Submitted by FALLEN (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:24:13 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
I made a list!
I'm a 99!
FatTony is linked to me???
I don't get it.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:23:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Oh, and shermantankbuddhaballs and zimm0r... that was a fun one.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:21:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
YEAH, BUT WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:21:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
heh. It means you used them on different posts are you rated differently with them on the same posts.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:18:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
The only alters I have in this are shapeshifter, storm, nicballs, TheUniter, and flapjacksupreme, but none of them are grouped together. What does that mean or reflect, per se?
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:11:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
It looks like I cut somebody out between cakes and bob. My bad. I had to paste this shit together. Have a good day, folks.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:09:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Hi FG. Yeah...I know. I left the alters in for now. I thought it would be interesting to see where they group in relation to their owners.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:08:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Sico - Are those a bunch or your alters your grouped with? That would be pretty neat if they were.
Submitted by forensicgirl3 (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:06:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I have to +2 SPSS!
Incidently, Arnie Geddon is Danger_Ranger. Just FYI for your database and all.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 08:04:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Sico's got it.
I just woke up and am waiting for my coffee. But briefly, this is a hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis, employing the furthest-neighbor method using a cosine measure, whatever the fuck that is. I used real ratings this time, instead of converting everything to binary numbers. The dendrogram above represents rating similarities by individual within a sample of 100 posts. It doesn't prove anything. It's merely an exploratory (read: mental-masturbatory) exercise.
If you'll find my name, you'll see that, within the sample, I rated most similarly to CaptainThornes. Also within our group is haikumikoo, brn_nkd, and so on. Groups are defined at different levels; we might consider the group from Beono to Anansie to have rated more similarly to each other than others outside our group.
One potential problem is the great number of users who are poorly represented in the sample. These may have confused things a bit. (That is, the procedure doesn't know what to do with them, or something. Maybe not.)
A couple things. The posts were not strictly selected at random. I favored posts with less than 50 reviews (to save time) and I favored posts that had scores between -1 and +1; these were likely to exhibit more variability in the scores. (If everybody rates a post the same, there's not much to measure.)
I like how TheUniter and Shlongy group together. This makes me think the exercise has "worked." And could GodChicken by TheUniter. Anyway, my coffee's ready.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2007-12-03 07:54:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Sico's got it right.
I just woke up and am waiting for my coffee. But briefly, this is a hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis, employing the furthest-neighbor method using a cosine measure, whatever the fuck that is. The dendrogram above represents rating similarities by individual within a sample of 100 posts. It doesn't prove anything. It's merely an exploratory (read: mental-masturbatory) exercise.
If you'll find my name, you'll see that, within the sample, I rated most similarly to CaptainThornes. Also
Submitted by orphelia (user info) at 2007-12-03 06:16:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
All I know is I am sandwiched between MonkeysWG and Rob Berg. I can think of much worse places to be.:)
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2007-12-03 06:05:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I think people with similar or close numbers are ubersite "alike" in that they review the same shit. Or, go fuck yourselves.
Submitted by HurtByTheSun (user info) at 2007-12-03 05:42:01 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
What's this mean/prove?
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2007-12-03 05:41:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
what the fuck does this mean, other than im taking the fact that you have a child to mean that he/she/it is the secondcoming, because it is clearly a product of immaculate conception.
Submitted by Nellypaal (user info) at 2007-12-03 05:36:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
+1 being on a list, but what did nerds DO before the internet?
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:59:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
im not sure I understand but I will when I read it
Submitted by DrogoRoch (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:33:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
So with a score of 90 what does that mean? I feel strange.
Submitted by TheDoctor (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:29:13 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
...
Submitted by Beano312003 (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:21:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
didn't read it.
Submitted by orphelia (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:11:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Holy Shit I made this list three times! hehe
Submitted by experima (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:08:54 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
what do the numbers mean? and why is mine like, so high?
Submitted by Flack (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:05:08 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Holy Shit. I made a list.
Submitted by orphelia (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:01:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Hey there Mr Cool.
Submitted by experima (user info) at 2007-12-03 04:00:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
experima=diavola
for those not in the know
Submitted by experima (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:59:44 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
neat. me and my alter both made a list I don't understand. woo!
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:42:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:40:53 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
According to this table...I WIN!!!
---
Then this table is fucking broken.
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:40:53 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
According to this table...I WIN!!!
Submitted by hour_man (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:33:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I made a list...
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:29:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
WEIRD.
Could you pretty please explain what any of this means?
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2007-12-03 03:25:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Fuck dude. I'm saying "nice job" with absolutely no idea what the 'job' has actually done.