APW - Byroglyphics (914 hits)
Category: GraphicsRating: 1.42 on 37 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by kaos-king (antius777) (View user info) at 2008-11-19 22:47:38 EST
BYROGLYPHICS is Russ Mills, a thirty-something artist from the United Kingdom. He's a multi-media visual artist who considers his work "Contemporary Impressionism." Sketches done with a simple Bic pen are then scanned and manipulated in PhotoShop. They are then printed out on Canvas, where after he applies layers of paint. While he has done some portraits of celebrities, most of his work features friends and family members.
User Reviews
Submitted by Darth_Famine (user info) at 2008-11-22 14:51:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by shadow (user info) at 2008-11-22 10:53:45 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I LOVE THIS.
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2008-11-22 04:42:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2008-11-20 08:43:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Stupid sandwich! Berg said nothing about doing it "better." He simply said he could do it. Having seen his artwork, I'm sure he could, and so could Kaos.
Go smear some mayonnaise on yourself and then die.
--
I would bubba, but I feel like mayonnaise would only attract your type. I don't need any other suggestions for lubrication; kthksby.
Submitted by Crystle (user info) at 2008-11-21 00:29:28 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
APW - Byroglyphics (Rating: 1.37 on 33 reviews, last by hidden101 69 minutes ago)
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2008-11-20 23:18:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
it's so transparent when sico reads stuff his feeble mind could never comprehend and then pastes it here, actually believing we'll think he's smart....
Submitted by shitfuck (user info) at 2008-11-20 22:53:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Deep like death.
Submitted by HighVoltage900 (user info) at 2008-11-20 17:27:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Those are pretty god damn good.
A good APW addition. (Are we still doing that? Am I uncool now for referencing it? Will my "uber-cred" take a hit? Maybe I should post some Ha Ha Rabbit)
Submitted by JoeyG (user info) at 2008-11-20 17:05:12 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Cool shit.
Shameless linkwhore to boot:
http://www.ubersite.com/m/95826
Byroglyphics reminded me of bioglyphics.....
Submitted by Wildman (user info) at 2008-11-20 16:42:11 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I've seen better smeared on cave walls, and at the bottom of bird cages.
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2008-11-20 13:50:37 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
these are good.
i have no doubt rob berg could do this. especially since these appear to be drawn from pictures as a couple of them are myspace poses and have obvious camera taintings in the composition.
Submitted by rubbermaid (user info) at 2008-11-20 13:39:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
For the record, I wasn't going for intelligence as I have no idea what all that means other than it's Krstic's Adaptive theory but I was seeing if those characters would copypasta or not.
Submitted by orphelia (user info) at 2008-11-20 12:20:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by simple_catalyst (user info) at 2008-11-20 11:53:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by rubbermaid (user info) at 2008-11-20 09:52:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
The following is just a test. I repeat, this is just a test. Had this been an a real attempt it would be completely garbled as per my standard.
The design procedure is recursive. At its i-th step and i-th-order subsystem is stabilized with respect
to a Lyapunov function V~ by the design of a stabilizing function ol i and a tuning function ~i. The update
law for the parameter estimate/~(t) and the feedback control u are designed at the final step.
Step 1: Introducing z I =x~ and z2=x2-0q, we rewrite .~ =x 2 + oTd~1(Xl)as
Z1 =Z2 + al + 0~l(Xl)
and use a I as a control to stabilize (2.1)with respect to
O)TF- 1(~ _ 0). Then
/21 =Z'(Z2 '+ ~I "]- oT~I) + (0- o)TF-I( ~- Fz,~1).
(2.1)
the Lyapunov function V 1 = ~1Z1 2 + 2( ~ --
(2.2)
If x 2 were our actual control, we would let z 2 ~ 0, that is, x 2 = a 1. Then, we would eliminate 0 - 0 from
/21 with the update law 0 = 21, where
'r,( x I ) = ezl¢1(x,).
To make /21 = -cl z2, we would choose
ffl(Xl, O) : --CIII--OT~)I(XI).
(2.3)
(2.4)
+++
noise!
Submitted by Harmon (user info) at 2008-11-20 10:40:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Looks like Sicosemen is trying to look intelligence again! The solution to that formula, as well as the answer to life itself, is in "Made in the U.S.A", by famed internet author Jack McCallum!
Submitted by Mr_Trollope (user info) at 2008-11-20 10:24:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
No Comment
Submitted by rubbermaid (user info) at 2008-11-20 09:52:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
The following is just a test. I repeat, this is just a test. Had this been an a real attempt it would be completely garbled as per my standard.
The design procedure is recursive. At its i-th step and i-th-order subsystem is stabilized with respect
to a Lyapunov function V~ by the design of a stabilizing function ol i and a tuning function ~i. The update
law for the parameter estimate/~(t) and the feedback control u are designed at the final step.
Step 1: Introducing z I =x~ and z2=x2-0q, we rewrite .~ =x 2 + oTd~1(Xl)as
Z1 =Z2 + al + 0~l(Xl)
and use a I as a control to stabilize (2.1)with respect to
O)TF- 1(~ _ 0). Then
/21 =Z'(Z2 '+ ~I "]- oT~I) + (0- o)TF-I( ~- Fz,~1).
(2.1)
the Lyapunov function V 1 = ~1Z1 2 + 2( ~ --
(2.2)
If x 2 were our actual control, we would let z 2 ~ 0, that is, x 2 = a 1. Then, we would eliminate 0 - 0 from
/21 with the update law 0 = 21, where
'r,( x I ) = ezl¢1(x,).
To make /21 = -cl z2, we would choose
ffl(Xl, O) : --CIII--OT~)I(XI).
(2.3)
(2.4)
Submitted by czwij (user info) at 2008-11-20 09:39:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
halucinogen cartoons
= +1
Submitted by rubbermaid (user info) at 2008-11-20 09:10:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I refuse the theory of adaption as presented by Krstic.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2008-11-20 09:00:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2008-11-19 22:54:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 I couldn't do it.
-------------------
I doubt I could either, but it doesn't seem too tough to do.
Don't get me wrong, I think it looks bad ass, and have lots of respect for this guy for coming up with this method, but it seems like any half decent artist could do this.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2008-11-20 08:43:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2008-11-20 05:12:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 04:11:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Read your own stupidity, sammich.
Then go lick your hand.
--
well, I read it, and then (JUST TO BE NICE) I licked my own hand. I didn't know what, at the time, the hand-licking had to do with anything, but I did it anyway, just to be sure.
I don't give a flying fuck what doodles said; why say "I can do this better" unless you are willing to show positive proof on "how" you could do this better? That was all. That's what struck me so discontent. I'm sorry Bergio, if I have offended you in some way. I will make an effigy and burn it here.
===============
Stupid sandwich! Berg said nothing about doing it "better." He simply said he could do it. Having seen his artwork, I'm sure he could, and so could Kaos.
Go smear some mayonnaise on yourself and then die.
Submitted by monkeyswithguns (user info) at 2008-11-20 08:03:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Amazing.
Submitted by Nellypaal (user info) at 2008-11-20 06:57:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I really like it. Infinitely better than your crap.
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2008-11-20 05:12:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 04:11:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Read your own stupidity, sammich.
Then go lick your hand.
--
well, I read it, and then (JUST TO BE NICE) I licked my own hand. I didn't know what, at the time, the hand-licking had to do with anything, but I did it anyway, just to be sure.
I don't give a flying fuck what doodles said; why say "I can do this better" unless you are willing to show positive proof on "how" you could do this better? That was all. That's what struck me so discontent. I'm sorry Bergio, if I have offended you in some way. I will make an effigy and burn it here.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 04:16:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
...and I still can't puzzle out why stating I COULD actually do something is childish or moronic.
Your reaction certainly was.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 04:11:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Read your own stupidity, sammich.
Then go lick your hand.
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2008-11-20 03:58:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
no no no no i'm not fucking your mother with that mouth, i'm smearing shit all over her mouth
get it straight, fella
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 03:07:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
haha
Now why in the fuck would you get so worked up over that comment, fella?
Doodles said he couldn't, I figure I could. It's still fucking cool either way.
Nice talk. You fuck my mother with that mouth?
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2008-11-20 02:46:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 02:26:59 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 I could do it.
--
Well, then go do it, and shut the fuck up. +2 I could do it. What a childish and moronic thing to say. +2 I could do it. Here, why I don't I just take a big fat shit on your face and then smear it on your mother's face just so she can see how beautiful my shit is close up. While I am shitting on your mother's face I will fuck her up the ass at the same time, while a different girl; probably very similar looking to your wife; wears a mask that is a B&W photocopy of your face and hits me over the head with a big wooden baseball bat.
do you get my point bergio or are you that fucking dense? Shit, I can't prove a negative.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2008-11-20 02:26:59 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 I could do it.
Submitted by simple_catalyst (user info) at 2008-11-20 00:59:01 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
noise.
Submitted by Crystle (user info) at 2008-11-19 23:28:13 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
wow
Submitted by RestrictionsApply (user info) at 2008-11-19 23:20:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Ooooo..
Submitted by hidden101 (user info) at 2008-11-19 23:13:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
that is fucking awesome.
Submitted by haikumikoo (user info) at 2008-11-19 23:01:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The whole photoshop thing turns me off completely. Especially since I looked at the pictures first, and thought they looked somewhat like a painting I had fucked with in photoshop. The main reason I appreciate people who can draw and paint well is because I cannot do it, but fucking photoshop?
Fuck this guy.
Submitted by kaos-king (user info) at 2008-11-19 22:59:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm simply in awe of this stuff.
I particularly like the fact that, except for the slight digital manipulation, he uses all really cheap products.
I guess his one-offs and prints are actually relatively cheap.
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2008-11-19 22:54:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 I couldn't do it.
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2008-11-19 22:52:43 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I'd like to get one framed.