Sexy (1305 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -1.08 on 68 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Majul Cartoons (View user info) at 2009-03-23 08:45:31 EDT
Here is the rest... if you get all 3, consider yourself intelligent... otherwise you're a moron.
To read more...
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendID=397296619
User Reviews
Submitted by CarterPFly (user info) at 2009-04-14 05:44:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I thaught the schrodingers cat joke was funny..
But only beacuse the only way to know if the boss was asleep or awake would be to interact directly with the boss which would have awoken the boss so you would never have known if he was previously asleep or awake, just like opening the box to see if the cat is alive or dead would invalidate the experiment as opening the box could well kill the cat...
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-14 05:32:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-14 03:10:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
its kind of you to sign your responses, but really, Majul will do, its obvious it stands for moron.
---------------------
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha... hey, that's a good one ...hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha... No, wait. I'm not finished holding my sides... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.... seriously now, No.
Moron
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-14 03:10:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
its kind of you to sign your responses, but really, Majul will do, its obvious it stands for moron.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-14 03:01:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-14 02:31:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
you suck. your post suck. die already & relive the excess population pressure
----------------------------------------
A swing and a miss.
Moron
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-14 02:31:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
you suck. your post suck. die already & relive the excess population pressure
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-14 02:04:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2009-04-10 16:25:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:39:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
http://www.ubersite.com/m/113566
---------------------
Meh. first, check the date on that, i think i was, what, 17 when i posted that. combo with the fact that it was a slow as shit day on here, it served it's purposes.
then we factor in the fact that you have the same sense of humor as a crack baby.
------------------
That's your most recent post, moron... a slow day doesn't excuse your retardation.
What you wrote was a random moron thought, next time your brain farts out a moron idea, shoot yourself.
I hope your mums legs get amputated mistakenly.
Dipshit
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2009-04-10 16:25:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:39:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
How very... stupid of you. i was going to read and rate your latest post to show you that i judge on the quality of the post, not the poster...
however i came across this
http://www.ubersite.com/m/113566
You should be ashamed to rate anyone's work (btw, i was surprised to see it actually scored -0.24)
Moron
-------------------------------------------------
Meh. first, check the date on that, i think i was, what, 17 when i posted that. combo with the fact that it was a slow as shit day on here, it served it's purposes.
then we factor in the fact that you have the same sense of humor as a crack baby.
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2009-04-07 04:39:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
hmmm I saw the post title and was wondering how you got a picture of me. Good thing. I would have ripped your balls off and fed them to my cat if you had. I don't have a cat.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-07 01:31:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by X54 (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:51:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
hesoterical (adj): simultaneously esoteric and hysterical
----------------
Moron... is all i can really say... well, i could say more, but it'd be a waste of time
Submitted by X54 (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:51:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
hesoterical (adj): simultaneously esoteric and hysterical
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:39:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:19:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
if your suck were rated on a scale of 1-10, you'd suck numbers 1 through 10
-----------------------------
How very... stupid of you. i was going to read and rate your latest post to show you that i judge on the quality of the post, not the poster...
however i came across this
http://www.ubersite.com/m/113566
You should be ashamed to rate anyone's work (btw, i was surprised to see it actually scored -0.24)
Moron
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2009-04-07 00:19:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
if your suck were rated on a scale of 1-10, you'd suck numbers 1 through 10
Submitted by HellRazer (user info) at 2009-04-06 22:12:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Normally I'd -2 this, however you've really done something amazing here. You've actually managed to make Dilbert LESS funny.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-06 21:25:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2009-04-06 19:59:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fagouche
-------------
aha, i see what you did there...
...you added "fag" to "douche" to give it more comedic effect, right? because i said before "leaving a comment like "fag" is rather pointless, so you added "douche" and made it funnier, right?
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2009-04-06 19:59:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fagouche
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-04-06 19:30:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
thanks for such descriptive criticism... has nothing to do with the actual post, still, it's good to call random people fags
Moron
Submitted by Darth_Famine (user info) at 2009-04-06 12:11:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fag
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-04-06 10:14:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
God you blow
Submitted by Mr_Trollope (user info) at 2009-04-06 09:33:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
here
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-25 20:33:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Whenever you're ready you can admit to being wrong, Sandantate....
In case you don't come forward, i took the privilege of writing your apology for you
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 21:51:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Sorry Majul Cartoons, i was wrong and you were right.
I wasn't sure what a paradox was, and i never heard of Schrodinger's cat before googling it.
I also secretly love your cartoon and wish you made more, however i know you're always busy and even writing a shorter 5 minute script (since people on the internet have a short attention span), making all references American (since we Yankees have no idea who Rove is), and then exporting it to India for animation would take about 6 months to a year.
Once again,
I'm sorry.
Submitted by mles76 (user info) at 2009-03-25 17:23:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Settle down Majul
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2009-03-25 11:09:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Paradox: http://pic19.picturetrail.com/VOL1061/953260/19345951/310387489.jpg
Submitted by TLawrence (user info) at 2009-03-25 10:31:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-25 10:02:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 21:51:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
A statement like "I always lie" is a paradox.
Schrondinger's cat and "A tree falls.." are both measurement thought experiments. i.e. Either yes or no could be the right answer, and the answer is not known until we make a measurement.
NEITHER ONE IS A PARADOX.
-----------------------
IF YOU ONLY READ ONE THING IN YOUR LIFE READ THE GREAT GATSBY, IF YOU ONLY READ TWO THINGS IN YOUR LIFE READ THE GREAT GATSBY AGAIN...
...hypothetically... i have a record of everything you ever said up until you say "i always lie"
so either everything you said up until that point was a lie, the truth or a mixture of both.
if everything you said up until that point was a lie then "everything you said up until that point was a lie with the exception of the last statement, which was the truth - thus breaking your record for telling lies"
if everything you said up until that point was the truth then "everything you said up until that point was the truth with the exception of the last statement, which was a lie - thus breaking your record for telling truth"
CONCLUSION
Either way, you end up with a mixture of both, hence "no, you don't always lie"... paradox broken.
To quote myself "we don't know which (answer is correct) as it was based on an "earlier random event" that nobody recorded."
Same with Schrodinger's cat and the "falling tree" paradox... its a paradox until
To quote you "we make a measurement." after we do, it's no longer a paradox.
... you get it now? a paradox does not last forever. Schrodinger's cat is a quick and easy example of a paradox as it doesn't require as long of a "record of random events" as the "I always lie" paradox (its also visual).
The whole point of the experiment is to create a paradox, then break it. otherwise you're just torturing a cat
...
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-25 05:26:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
...ergh... you are a moron
here are the first 5 results for Schrodinger's cat in google...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat
"Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, often described as a paradox"
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci341236,00.html
"and the cat becomes one or the other (dead or alive). This situation is sometimes called quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox"
http://www.phobe.com/s_cat/s_cat.html
"cat's state is as of this very moment exactly alive and dead (though technically, 100% dead and 100% alive at the same time -- hence the paradox)"
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/ardlouis/dissipative/Schrcat.html
"one of the most celebrated paradoxes in quantum theory"
http://www.mtnmath.com/cat.html
(NO MENTION OF PARADOX - you think that proves something? no, its titled "Schrödinger's cat for a 6th grader", and a fucking 6th grader might not know what a fucking paradox is.
the 6th result in google is titled "The Cat Paradox"
i didn't create all those sites just to prove you wrong, they were there all along.
and what proof do you give to say it's not a paradox? your subjective opinion punched out with your dads cock on your keyboard.
let me adjust myself comfortably in my chair before i type this...
"You are too much of a moron to reslise you're wrong."
...And this is exactly why i'm bitter, angry and insulting to people, because 90% of people are exactly like you... you're that same moron who writes a cheque at a grocery store, parks across 5 car spaces, you're that moron who talks about their day with the bank teller while i'm stuck in line, you're that dumb waiter who doesn't shut up about his specials, the Indian telemarketer who thinks i give a shit.... you're all that and much more... the remaining 10% of us have to put up with morons like you
moron
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-25 04:27:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
YOU TRYING TO USE YOUR BRAIN IS A FUCKING PARADOX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, not a paradox. Neither the sentence, nor the act it implies. The sentence is just an improper use of grammar, and the act it implies is, at worst, the start of a headache.
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-25 04:22:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
"Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, often described as a paradox"
"Quantum mechanics suggests that after a while the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when we look in the box, we see the cat either alive or dead, not a mixture of alive and dead."
If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to hear it, does it make a sound?
Yes or no.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Chicken or egg
Both the fucking answers work, but only one can be correct... we don't know which as it was based on an "earlier random event" that nobody recorded.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me use little words for you. None of what is written above describes a paradox. Let me dumb it down a little more for you- above is not paradox. I don't understand how you can look up the word and still get this wrong. Schrondinger's cat and "A tree falls.." are both measurement thought experiments. i.e. Either yes or no could be the right answer, and the answer is not known until we make a measurement. Nothing about either one is self contridictory. NOTHING IS SELF CONTRIDICTORY ABOUT EITHER ONE. NOTHING IS SEEMINGLY SELF CONTRIDICTORY ABOUT EITHER ONE. YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE PHRASE "SELF CONTRIDICTORY" PLAYS A PROMINENT ROLE IN ALL FOUR DEFINITIONS, THEREFORE NEITHER ONE IS A PARADOX.
I'll help you out a little bit more, since you seem to put a lot of weight in Wikipedia. I'll log-in and correct the "often described as a paradox line" by adding the word 'erroneously' (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=erroneously), that way you can get passed your ignorant hang-up.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 22:58:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
From:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/paradox
paradox
1. a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd but in reality expresses a possible truth.
2. a self-contradictory and false proposition.
3. any person, thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature.
4. an opinion or statement contrary to commonly accepted opinion.
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat
"Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, often described as a paradox"
"Quantum mechanics suggests that after a while the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when we look in the box, we see the cat either alive or dead, not a mixture of alive and dead."
It falls under the first definition of a fucking paradox
If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to hear it, does it make a sound?
Yes or no.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Chicken or egg
Both the fucking answers work, but only one can be correct... we don't know which as it was based on an "earlier random event" that nobody recorded.
"Everything i say is a lie" falls under the second definition of the paradox.
YOU TRYING TO USE YOUR BRAIN IS A FUCKING PARADOX
moron
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 21:51:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
"If a tree falls in the woods..." is not a paradox. You don't know what a paradox is, obviously. A statement like "I always lie" is a paradox, because If I always lie, then that statement is a lie which would mean that I don't always lie. But if that statement is true and I always lie, how can you trust the statement to not be a lie.
Schroginger's cat is not a paradox. The fact that people describe it as a paradox shows their ignorance on both the subjects of quantum physics and entanglement, and the definition of paradox. So, again, the "joke" is not a joke. It doesn't mean anything. It's incorrect on every level. You're an idiot.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 19:37:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 09:13:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
That's not what Schrondinger's cat means, you imbecile. Schrondinger's cat is familiar to "If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" i.e. The act of measuring and recording an event makes it real. You just wedged a term into a description that is similar, but incorrect. You are the living example of that "Ironic" song by Alanis Morrisette.
-------------------------------------
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 05:43:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You fucking dolt. Schrodinger's cat is not a paradox; it's a simplification of a thought experiment in quantum mechanics.
--------------------------------------------
The tree falling in the forest crap is a paradox, you said Schrodinger's cat wasn't a paradox... who made you the fucking expert on Schrodinger's cat?
The truth is, you are the product of incest and have no idea what it means, you had never heard of Schrodinger's cat until you googled it... then your retarded brain tried to fart out its own moronic meaning of Schrodinger's cat
Go borrow a gun from a Yankee friend and shoot yourself
Once again,
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat
Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, often described as a paradox, devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. It illustrates what he saw as the problem of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics being applied to everyday objects. The thought experiment presents a cat that might be alive or dead, depending on an earlier random event. In the course of developing this experiment, he coined the term Verschränkung (entanglement).
Key word - Verschränkung
and again,
THAT'S THE JOKE, THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHATS BEING SAID BECAUSE THEY'RE MORONS
JUST LIKE YOU,
moron
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 09:13:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
The second, "...Just like schrodinger's cat" (your assumption about the boss being both awake and sleeping at the same time was correct). However, Dilberts punchline was for his own amusement and not the other person (Wally, who is also a moron in the Dilbert series and would not understand the phrase).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not what Schrondinger's cat means, you imbecile. Schrondinger's cat is familiar to "If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" i.e. The act of measuring and recording an event makes it real. You just wedged a term into a description that is similar, but incorrect. You are the living example of that "Ironic" song by Alanis Morrisette.
Submitted by rorrim (user info) at 2009-03-24 09:06:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You take teh suck to teh max.
do or do not.Stop trying.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 09:02:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
...most the guys here seem to be hitting on me
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-03-24 08:59:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fey's hitting on you.
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-03-24 08:57:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
ugh if you sucked any more my fucking head would cave in.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 08:48:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 05:43:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You fucking dolt. Schrodinger's cat is not a paradox; it's a simplification of a thought experiment in quantum mechanics. Maybe, just maybe, you should try google. Pick up a book and educate yourself. You're probably one of those idiots that use the word 'irredguardless' and then pretend that they were being ironic when they get called on their stupidity.
-----------------------------------
Schrodinger's cat is a fucking paradox... you know nothing of quantum mechanics, so go shove your head up your mums cunt and suffocate.
Seriously, I hope your two dads molest you extra hard today.
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat
Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, often described as a paradox, devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. It illustrates what he saw as the problem of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics being applied to everyday objects. The thought experiment presents a cat that might be alive or dead, depending on an earlier random event. In the course of developing this experiment, he coined the term Verschränkung (entanglement).
To rephrase...
The first joke, "My definitions were too esoteric" was a joke on the boss, who (if you ever watched or read Dilbert) tries to appear smart and all knowing, omnipotent if you will, even tho he's a total moron.
If she said "no one understood my definitions" the boss would have understood what she meant.
The second, "...Just like schrodinger's cat" (your assumption about the boss being both awake and sleeping at the same time was correct). However, Dilberts punchline was for his own amusement and not the other person (Wally, who is also a moron in the Dilbert series and would not understand the phrase).
Also, Dilbert did not know the boss sleeps with his eyes open (he can see the boss, presumably awake), and hence the line "Won't the boss see you?", Wally's response "I don't know, he sleeps, yadi, yadi, yada
The first joke (esoteric) was also a set up for the second joke (being that the punchline was esoteric).... and the final strip was a joke on the first two as being simplistic.
THAT'S THE JOKE, THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHATS BEING SAID BECAUSE THEY'RE MORONS
JUST LIKE YOU,
moron
Submitted by Fey (user info) at 2009-03-24 07:34:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
you smell like sico.
and Haha: http://www.ubersite.com/m/121540#2873599
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 05:43:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You fucking dolt. Schrodinger's cat is not a paradox; it's a simplification of a thought experiment in quantum mechanics. Maybe, just maybe, you should try google. Pick up a book and educate yourself. You're probably one of those idiots that use the word 'irredguardless' and then pretend that they were being ironic when they get called on their stupidity.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 04:08:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Most people here like me, they're just afraid to admit it in front of other morons.
i seek no acceptance as i already have it
Submitted by dangerdude (user info) at 2009-03-24 02:44:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
I love the fact that Majul has totally camped this post out.
Like he's searching for acceptance among Uberites that all hate him.
Maybe he's lonely.
I didn't get the first two, but I always love a good aids joke.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 02:21:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 02:07:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
google doesn't bring knowledge, obviously. As Phallic pointed out, the second "joke" is complete nonsense. You apparently do not know what Schrodinger's cat means.
----------------
You retarded dipshit, i never said google brings knowledge, googling was my hint to you.
And how is it that everyone is now a fucking expert on Schrodinger's cat...?
Schrodinger's cat is simply a paradox
go shave your mums cunt
idiot
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-24 02:07:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
google doesn't bring knowledge, obviously. As Phallic pointed out, the second "joke" is complete nonsense. You apparently do not know what Schrodinger's cat means.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-24 00:27:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by cheerios (user info) at 2009-03-23 23:24:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fuck right off, faggot
------------
WTF? who the fuck are you, dipshit.
Go have your period somewhere else, fuck off.
and the use of the word "fagot" as an insult is just lame. Why would i be offended if i were gay?
Moron
Submitted by cheerios (user info) at 2009-03-23 23:24:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fuck right off, faggot
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 22:15:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:52:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I can't imagine googling two things of which i already know the meaning is going to help me here.
Were you trying to suggest that "My definitions were esoteric" is funny because "esoteric" is, itself, an esoteric term? I hope not, because that would be a misuse of the word. Had she said "my definitions were circumlocutory/ bombastic/ loquacious" i would have at least understood it to be a joke, even though it would still have failed to be funny.
If she had said "My expositions utilised a recondite communicatory oeuvre" then the joke might've even worked.
And as for the second,
And if you were going for the comparison with Shrodinger's cat indicating that the boss is simultaneously in a state of sleep and awakeness then this was undermined by the second frame not leaving scope for ambiguity by stating determinitively that "he sleeps with his eyes open". As it stands you just seem to suggest that Shrodinger's cat sleeps with its eyes open which is, as i said, nonsensical.
If you had said "Do you know if the boss is awake?" - "Oh he's asleep alright, but only in the sense that Shrodinger's cat is dead" then the (weak) premise would at least be played out.
Moran.
----------------
Firstly, for someone attempting to sound smart you sure made a lot of spelling mistakes...
Secondly, i wont argue about you finding the terms after i hinted to use google... even tho your first response was not as detailed and didn't use a -2
blah, blah, blah... never the less you are correct as to the definitions, however you read into the jokes too much.
The first joke, "My definitions were too esoteric" was a joke on the boss, who (if you ever watched or read Dilbert) tries to appear smart and all knowing, omnipotent if you will, even tho he's a total moron.
If she said "no one understood my definitions" the boss would have understood what she meant.
The second, "...Just like schrodinger's cat" (your assumption about the boss being both awake and sleeping at the same time was correct). However, Dilberts punchline was for his own amusement and not the other person (Wally, who is also a moron in the Dilbert series and would not understand the phrase).
Also, Dilbert did not know the boss sleeps with his eyes open (he can see the boss, presumably awake), and hence the line "Won't the boss see you?", Wally's response "I don't know, he sleeps, yadi, yadi, yada
The first joke (esoteric) was also a set up for the second joke (being that the punchline was esoteric).... and the final strip was a joke on the first two as being simplistic.
Ta Da
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 20:46:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
If you explain these "jokes" and the explanation is not exactly what i said below i will be fucking amazed.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 19:12:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-23 18:34:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fail
-------------------
The only thing failed is your life... You have less credibility then Josef Mengele
I hope your mum's house gets foreclosed and she gets her legs amputated mistakenly
retard
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-03-23 18:34:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
fail
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2009-03-23 17:58:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Hey! Look! It's Charles Shultz!
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 17:37:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Toddler (user info) at 2009-03-23 17:29:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
-2ING YOU FEELS PRETTY AWESOME
---------------------
Yes, let the hate flow through you.
Submitted by Toddler (user info) at 2009-03-23 17:29:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
-2ING YOU FEELS PRETTY AWESOME
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 17:02:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:52:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I can't imagine googling two things of which i already know the meaning is going to help me here.
Were you trying to suggest that "My definitions were esoteric" is funny because "esoteric" is, itself, an esoteric term? I hope not, because that would be a misuse of the word. Had she said "my definitions were circumlocutory/ bombastic/ loquacious" i would have at least understood it to be a joke, even though it would still have failed to be funny.
If she had said "My expositions utilised a recondite communicatory oeuvre" then the joke might've even worked.
And as for the second,
And if you were going for the comparison with Shrodinger's cat indicating that the boss is simultaneously in a state of sleep and awakeness then this was undermined by the second frame not leaving scope for ambiguity by stating determinitively that "he sleeps with his eyes open". As it stands you just seem to suggest that Shrodinger's cat sleeps with its eyes open which is, as i said, nonsensical.
If you had said "Do you know if the boss is awake?" - "Oh he's asleep alright, but only in the sense that Shrodinger's cat is dead" then the (weak) premise would at least be played out.
Moran.
----------------
No, that is not were i was going at all... keep thinking.
Moran
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-03-23 12:18:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2009-03-23 10:28:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
really, think about a career change dude.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 10:24:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hmm, i thought that majul spelt it "morans" but just scrolled through some of his work and it seems he got that one right. Well then who spelt it, morans? this'll keep me awake...
Submitted by Blackberry (user info) at 2009-03-23 10:22:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
STOP EATING GLUE STICKS MOTHERFUCKER
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2009-03-23 10:03:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
phallic...its ummm moron, moran is a Syriac title for Jesus Christ
ummmm
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:52:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I can't imagine googling two things of which i already know the meaning is going to help me here.
Were you trying to suggest that "My definitions were esoteric" is funny because "esoteric" is, itself, an esoteric term? I hope not, because that would be a misuse of the word. Had she said "my definitions were circumlocutory/ bombastic/ loquacious" i would have at least understood it to be a joke, even though it would still have failed to be funny.
If she had said "My expositions utilised a recondite communicatory oeuvre" then the joke might've even worked.
And as for the second,
And if you were going for the comparison with Shrodinger's cat indicating that the boss is simultaneously in a state of sleep and awakeness then this was undermined by the second frame not leaving scope for ambiguity by stating determinitively that "he sleeps with his eyes open". As it stands you just seem to suggest that Shrodinger's cat sleeps with its eyes open which is, as i said, nonsensical.
If you had said "Do you know if the boss is awake?" - "Oh he's asleep alright, but only in the sense that Shrodinger's cat is dead" then the (weak) premise would at least be played out.
Moran.
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:11:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hint - google esoteric and schrodinger's cat
Submitted by RoadSong (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:09:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
For the AIDS..
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:05:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
for some reason, i liked the second one
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:03:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Only the third one is an actual joke. The first has no punchline and the second is nonsensical.
Submitted by redskieslookfake (user info) at 2009-03-23 09:00:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by Brdn_Nkd (user info) at 2009-03-23 08:58:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by MajulCartoons (user info) at 2009-03-23 08:58:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
thanks for the generic comebacks
morons
Submitted by GodChicken (user info) at 2009-03-23 08:57:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-03-23 08:56:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
God you are a supernova of suck
Submitted by Wildman (user info) at 2009-03-23 08:55:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Eat shit and die.