READY the Asstroglide!! (549 hits)
Category: Business & FinancialRating: -0.96 on 28 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (View user info) at 2009-04-15 01:42:20 EDT
Yes, More change you can believe in. Your shaft elect just appointed a 5th RIAA lawyer to the DOJ.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/04/obama-taps-fift.html
User Reviews
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-18 20:27:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
http://www.ubersite.com/m/121896
Barry Obama, the gentle custodian of your liberties, defender of the underprivileged, righter of wrongs real & imaginary. Ready the ASSTROGLIDE
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-18 20:16:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The wise thing would have been to vote for neither. You can spend the rest of your days rationalizing the WHY of it, but you can't blame anyone else for your mistakes, that being voting for a token ofay who's going to strip you of whatever notions of anonymity or privacy you may heave entertained. ever.
NOW ready the ASSTROGLIDE, you cum drunk excuse for universal suffrage.
Submitted by pandora (user info) at 2009-04-18 19:13:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2009-04-15 20:12:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
You're fucked. That's what you get for choosing style over substance.
---
Are you honestly suggesting that McCain had more substance that Obama?
(dramatic pause)
Really?
----------------------------------------------
Yeah, some of us voted for Obama because it was a choice between him and Sarah Palin, who would've been a heart attack away from becoming President if McCain had won. Having Sarah Palin anywhere near the White House simply was not acceptable. (Read or view any of her interviews if you don't know why. It's pretty bad when you can be parodied on SNL and they use exact quotes.)
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-16 00:38:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
not just A lawyer, this is the 5th one ...
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-16 00:35:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Anybody for conflict of interest? contract bridge? This is like appointing a crack whore to chaperone your children.
"...Copyleft's plea to Obama falls on deaf ears as another Jenner music litigator heads to DOJ; Gershengorn will head Federal Programs Branch
Well, it looks like the copyleft's recent letter to President Obama lamenting that "several of your appointees to positions that oversee the formulation and implementation of IP policy have, immediately prior to their appointments, represented the concentrated copyright industries" went into a big, giant black hole..."
http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/04/copylefts-plea-to-obama-falls-on-deaf.html
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-04-16 00:26:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Nobody has been fucked. All he has done is appoint a lawyer who happened to work for the recording industry. All the rest of this is your fever dream. This is seriously becoming asinine.
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-15 23:57:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Johnny.b.goode was a cracker. Ask your momma who Johnny.b.dumb is
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2009-04-15 23:48:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
WHO THE FUCK IS THIS NIGGER JOONY.B.GOOD AND WHY IS HE IN MY UBERSITE????
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2009-04-15 22:47:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
cool, a link!
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-15 22:32:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
what do you mean "If he really steps out of line" ? He's already fucked you, now you want him to kiss you as well? You know, both Hitler & Mussolini started populist....and they started by dealing with dissidents at home first.
..--==++ yet another stupendous ellipsis ++==--..
Ready the ASSTROGLIDE, bitch!
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-04-15 20:24:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
What the hell is this true believer shit you keep popping off with? Obama isn't some fucking deity, and to my knowledge, he didn't run on the "I'm Jesus" platform. Knock it the fuck off. We'll handle this shit. All of the things you are complaining about were started by the Bush administration anyways. I didn't see you on this board for the 8 fucking years he was running my country into the ground. He hasn't even been in office for 3 solid months yet. Back the fuck off. If he really steps out of line, we'll impeach him. Our legal system may be a bit clumsy and slow to get moving, but it's the best in the world at what it does, and it'll do it's job. The day that it doesn't work anymore, you won't have to worry about making your snarky comments on an anonymous website. You'll have to worry about dodging missles and hoping you don't catch radiation poisoning.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2009-04-15 20:12:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
You're fucked. That's what you get for choosing style over substance.
---
Are you honestly suggesting that McCain had more substance that Obama?
(dramatic pause)
Really?
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-15 19:28:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
So pointing out _fact_ is hatemongering eh? Nothing like a true believer!
What evidence has been presented? Are you reading the same text I am? 'cause just claiming that ''...You strike me as someone (like a Christian Fundamentalist) that no matter what evidence is presented to you it "proves" whatever you are trying to argue...'' without ACTUALLY presenting/pointing to any EVIDENCE is silly as fuck. The issues with Obama not following up on the most basic campaign promises are real. The EFF really did go on record to assert that the Obama DOJ is inferior to the Bush DOJ... THOSE are the facts, or evidence if you will.
The fact that Obama's administration is concerned with spying on you is obvious. Now you can call what Obama does an exercise of executive privilege - this is the same thing the American right was doing during the bush presidency.
Bush had popular support. Nixon also had popular support. As did Regan. How exactly does Barry Obama differ form these men?
Increasingly it's just an issue of colour, 'cause john ashcroft, turdblossom et al. never had a better friend....You know what that makes of "change you can believe in" ?
..--==super dramatic mega elipsis==--..
balls!
Get ready to be Barrack-shafted
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-04-15 18:20:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You strike me as someone (like a Christian Fundamentalist) that no matter what evidence is presented to you it "proves" whatever you are trying to argue. Please- go sit down and let us run our own country. Believe me; we have enough moronic hate mongerers in our own shores. They don't need your help to be afraid of daylight.
Submitted by gascs (user info) at 2009-04-15 16:05:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You strike me as the kind of person who has very strong opinions on things that he doesn't understand.
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-15 14:51:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Funny, how people insist on laying their FAITH in something or someone, no matter what their particular take on religion is.
...(dramatic elipsis)...
Case in point: Obama has already broken some serious promises about transparency & shown that he is as much or more obsessed with gathering intelligence about own citizens than the previous administration. Everything else he does in that area is now tainted.
Of course appointing DOJ lawyers is HIS prerogative & by choosing precisely those RIAA lawyers HE is sending a message about his administration's stance on, for example net neutrality issues. Effective control of p2p would mean control of end user encryption ( like in france ), deep packet inspection, traffic pattern analysis. Since its easy enough to use efnet / an encrypted vpn, this means that someone will be tasked with entrapment; That in turn means treating folks who share files like child molesters. So much for net initiative on his behalf! also in the offing:
...(more dramatic elipsis) ...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TEC_PUNISHING_PROXIES?SITE=ILEDW&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
qq{"Proxy servers are an everyday part of Internet surfing. But using one in a crime could soon lead to more time in the clink.
A key vote Wednesday on new federal sentencing guidelines would classify the use of proxies as evidence of "sophistication," increasing sentences by about 25 percent - which could mean years or even decades longer behind bars, depending on the crime. It's akin to judges handing down stiffer sentences when a gun is used in a robbery.
Yet digital-rights advocates are worried. Although they aren't absolving criminals, they complain that the proposal is so broad, it could lead to unnecessarily harsh sentences for tech neophytes who didn't know they were using proxies in the first place or who were simply engaging in a practice often encouraged as a safer way of using the Internet.
"It sends a bad message about protecting your own privacy," said John Morris, general counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology. "This is the government saying, 'If you take normal steps to protect your privacy, we're going to view you as a more sophisticated criminal.'"}
...( even more dramatic elipsis)...
"Never has our ability to shield our affairs from prying eyes been at such a low ebb. The availability and use of secure encryption may offer an opportunity to reclaim some portion of the privacy we have lost. Government efforts to control encryption thus may well implicate not only the First Amendment rights of cryptographers intent on pushing the boundaries of their science, but also the constitutional rights of each of us as potential recipients of encryption's bounty."
US Appeals Court Judge Betty Fletcher
---(dramatic denouement)...
You're fucked. That's what you get for choosing style over substance.
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-04-15 13:03:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:07:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
well, doesn't that fall under executive privilege?
I think it does. Meanwhile, the man has been in office for three months now. Can we at least let him get comfortable?
We certainly don't need the half-brained opinions of Northern Atlantic people who don't live here.
Submitted by sandmantate (user info) at 2009-04-15 13:03:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:37:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
I don't remember bush getting this kind of flack within his first 1/32 of his tenure.
Submitted by SkullBiter (user info) at 2009-04-15 12:29:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
FIF
Submitted by sage104 (user info) at 2009-04-15 09:52:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Well I seem to not mind you, so have a point. I dont know how I feel about this post, though. I dont care enough to explore the non-feelings, either.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:37:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
I don't remember bush getting this kind of flack within his first 1/32 of his tenure.
Submitted by gascs (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:37:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
The RIAA was right.
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:19:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
why? is caul coming over for dinner?
Submitted by beeltea (user info) at 2009-04-15 08:07:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
well, doesn't that fall under executive privilege?
I think it does. Meanwhile, the man has been in office for three months now. Can we at least let him get comfortable?
We certainly don't need the half-brained opinions of Northern Atlantic people who don't live here.
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2009-04-15 07:42:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2009-04-15 04:35:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2009-04-15 09:34:17 BST (#)
Ranking: -2
Jesus Christ.
----------
jezzz its BARACK OBAMAMAMAMAMA
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2009-04-15 04:34:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Jesus Christ.
Submitted by johnny.b.dumb (user info) at 2009-04-15 01:50:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Legal Scholar: Obama Breaking Promise for Online Transparency
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/04/obama-breaking.html