Larger, Fuller, Thicker, and Increasing In Size (1652 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 1.29 on 76 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by S.I. Co. (View user info) at 2009-10-29 10:04:01 EDT
User Reviews
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-11-06 01:37:47 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-11-02 17:52:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
You all missed my point so fucking hard and I cannot be fucked explaining it again.
That's all.
---
i didnt miss your point, guru, i just said it was meaningless and pretentious. and as im sure youre aware, i know a thing or two about pretension.
ps. one thing ive learned from experience is if youre saying 'you all missed my point', then you fucked your point up.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-11-06 01:31:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
speaking of condescending
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-11-02 17:52:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
You all missed my point so fucking hard and I cannot be fucked explaining it again.
That's all.
Submitted by Lightforge (user info) at 2009-11-02 17:31:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Really? Equine retard? Just wrong. Seriously, the fewer developmental disabilities are used as insults, the farther we will progress toward acceptance and proper (ethical) valuation of people. I'm not just talking about PC bullcrap, either. People get hurt this way. Yes, this is the internets, but it's bad practice and it spreads more easily than is often noticed.
Though I agree that astrophysicists need to show more discretion in what they pander as fact or finding. Just because the theory fits the available observations doesn't make the theory right.
So the article. Yeah, I thought it was interesting.
Submitted by Susie_Derkins (user info) at 2009-11-02 16:30:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
NEAT.
Submitted by firefly (user info) at 2009-11-01 15:38:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by Tokerson (user info) at 2009-10-31 03:36:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2009-10-30 17:44:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
TL,DL
Submitted by pandora (user info) at 2009-10-30 17:25:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
iddqd. I can't spell. o shit, me lose brane szCbvfresn.... ..
Submitted by pandora (user info) at 2009-10-30 17:24:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
1. For some reason, this post reminded me of "Flowers For Algernon". Quick, Moe, put the crayon back!
2. This makes the idea that Earth holds the only life in the universe seem totally absurd.
3. I think I love idqqd now.
Submitted by wardy (user info) at 2009-10-30 14:02:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
i want to command the first space fleet voyage to another galaxay.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-30 08:49:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Oh, well then iddqd, continue on and excuse my interjections.
Submitted by JoeyG (user info) at 2009-10-30 06:09:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I enjoyed seeing IDDCD pointing out other people's needs to seem intelligent, by trying to be intelligent.
Submitted by TheBrad (user info) at 2009-10-30 05:23:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2009-10-29 11:23:15 PDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by MudWhistle (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:03:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Percentages would tell us that it would be impossible (or nearly) for what happened to create life on earth.....hasn't happened somewhere else amongst the universe.
------------------------
There is no accurate way to get a "percentage" for the likelyhood of earth.
Ask my personal opinion, and I am sure there is life.
_____________________________________________________
Yeah, there is. We are here. There is a 100% likelihood of an earth-like planet in the universe.
But now that I look at both of your messages, you were not disagreeing.
But what you should know is how it got here! It was the flying spaghetti monster!
I need more bushmills.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:49:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
the insult wasnt directed at you, sico. as ctrl-c ctrl-v posts go, this is in the top 5%. its an interesting post, and has drawn out what i feel is some interesting discussion. so congrats.
the insult was only directed at that vapid d-bag, sage.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:42:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
you just need to bow to my greater baseball knowledge, fella.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:41:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
hey, don't insult me just because pedro has ALWAYS been the yankees bitch and continued the tradition tonight.
you should have called charlie and told him i said so.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:31:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
While it might be more diverse than most on this website, iddqd's catalog of insults repeats itself and two of which have come full circle on this post.
I post things I find interesting and the copying of a .gif may be simple enough but understanding (or trying to), taking an interest, etc. in the subject matter can hardly be tossed aside.
p.s. You fuck like a virgin.
p.p.s. Scourge is fat.
p.p.p.s Martinez was in for an inning too long.
Submitted by Ducky (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:00:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
something i wouldn't expect from you.
iddqd's responses are amusing.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:00:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
yeah cos copying and pasting an animated gif requires intelligence of the highest order, you fucking equine retard.
Submitted by sage104 (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:58:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
This actually held my interest, smarty pants.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:53:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
also, please dont back up your arguments, we're having an interesting (at least i think it is) discussion. lets not muddy it with sources.
least of all wikipedia. jeez. next youll be misusing 'your'.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:50:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
you can post fact after fact - im not disputing the evidence found by physicists that tells them that they know precisely fuck all about the universe and how it works, im disputing the rubbish that some of them publish in lieu of having anything remotely fucking useful to say about it all. im aware thats the best they can do at this stage of our understanding of physics and quantum, but a lot of it is still bullshit, and should be regarded as such.
i know quantum is weird, we all know quantum is weird, and the guys that study it are no less weird. this doesnt make them any deeper or amazing, theyre just trying (and often failing) to explain the - as yet - unexplainable.
im still gonna call bullshit when i see it. its like those lazy scientists who, when they see something they cant explain, like how water exists, turn to god. but in this case instead of turning to an imaginary friend to explain something, they couch 'i have no fucking idea what this means' in longwinded obfuscating language.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:44:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The weirdness of the universe is based upon experimental data that has been tested and retested and completely contradicts the seemingly "obvious" aspects of our reality. These hypotheses don't come from philosophy professors sitting on the verandah smoking cones, they come from physicists who get repeated results that make no fucking sense at all and have to fit that data into some sort of cogent framework.
Aspects of our universe like the fact that time slows as you move faster are not speculative weed induced ramblings, they're the only conclusion you can draw from the information we have at hand.
The universe, like I said, is fucking weird:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect
"The short and simple of it being that even in a perfect vacuum, in the complete and utter absence of ANY particles of ANYTHING, if you put two plates close enough to each other, they will experience a force of attraction due to quantized particle vibration. What particles, you ask? Why, the infinite number of particles that wink in and out of existence at every single point in the universe of course!
So if the plates are close enough together, the particles with vibration wavelengths too large are not allowed inside. Therefore, the infinite number of particles winking in and out of existence between the plates is smaller than the larger infinite number of particles winking in and out of existence outside the plate. Voila! A force is exerted! (and has been measured by real scientists in the real world)"
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:43:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i find the use of overly complex language to say something quite simple and common-sense to be more condescending than my direct response.
for example: 'it just colours the vapidity with impressive lexicon' is just an overly complex way to say 'its just trying to sound clever when it isnt.' what a toolbag.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:39:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
there we go
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:27:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
and further, you could replace everything that summation youve posted with:
"wow, the universe is like, totally weird and stuff." insert hair-twirl at your own discretion. it just colours the vapidity with impressive lexicon.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:24:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
im not being condescending, i dont think i could be condescending at all to you, youre clearly intelligent enough to know when/if that would be happening.
im aware of the general point the author, and by extension you, are trying to raise, i merely reject this sort of philosophy as the bullshit that it is. it is pure meaningless hypothesis that has no value whatosever and is the worst sort of jaw-flapping self-important tripe that philosophy can subject itself to.
as i said in my first response, you can substitute the entire quote/paraphrase for anything at all and it doesnt lose its 'meaning' (or lack thereof) at all.
here IS some condescension to finish it off: youre better than that.
Submitted by maiorano84 (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:23:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:08:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hey id, I'm not suggesting that the universe as we know it is an instantaneous ordering of nothingness that we are misinterpreting as a linear-time reality, I'm just pointing out the point made by Brian Greene, the physicist, that our understanding of entropy results in the counter intuitive situation where the existence of our universe in linear spacetime is so unlikely that even outrageous possibilities like the random confluence of particles is, statistically, almost immeasurably more likely than what we take to be the current state of the universe.
Stop being so condescending, please. It's a statement about the bizarre nature of the entropic principle, not an actual suggestion about the nature of reality.
------------------------------
You hurted my brainmeats.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:14:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
HOLY SHIT HOW LONG HAS THERE BEEN A CANCEL BUTTON NEXT TO THE RANK BUTTON WHEN YOU REVIEW?!
this changes everything.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:14:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
you know what? fuck that... i want to see if iddy can get even MORE condescending as viewing those displays are one of the few pleasures i get from this site anymore.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:08:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hey id, I'm not suggesting that the universe as we know it is an instantaneous ordering of nothingness that we are misinterpreting as a linear-time reality, I'm just pointing out the point made by Brian Greene, the physicist, that our understanding of entropy results in the counter intuitive situation where the existence of our universe in linear spacetime is so unlikely that even outrageous possibilities like the random confluence of particles is, statistically, almost immeasurably more likely than what we take to be the current state of the universe.
Stop being so condescending, please. It's a statement about the bizarre nature of the entropic principle, not an actual suggestion about the nature of reality.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:06:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"trillions of times more likely"
seriously, if thats a quote, or at least a close paraphrase, did the author get out his giant space-calculator to work that out? what a totally meaningless nothingcomment.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 21:04:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
hey bubba, ive just been wondering: after her coma, has your wife woken up more or less retarded than what she would have had to have been to marry you?
im hoping for ubersite's sake its the former, otherwise we'll all be seeing you leaving dumbass unfunny facepalm comments 24/7. and if this site isnt dead now, THAT'LL surely finish it off.
Submitted by Merlina (user info) at 2009-10-29 20:22:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 forever for this post alone.
Submitted by Merlina (user info) at 2009-10-29 20:22:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
fuck it
I'm in constant awe.
BOW TO THE UNIVERSE
Submitted by willartstorg (user info) at 2009-10-29 20:00:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Back in about 1966 or so there was a saying."We're all part of Joe Skelley's dream. When he wakes up, we're fucked."
You aren't special, iddqd, not in the slightest.
Submitted by iddqd (user info) at 2009-10-29 18:56:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-10-29 18:13:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"The Fabric of the Cosmos" is a bit more mind boggling than "A Brief History of Time", if that's possible. I highly recommend it.
Example: It is trillions of times more likely that our universe has arranged itself into its current form (planets, suns, us etc), from nothing, for less than a nanosecond, that all our "memories" are false and that the universe will return to complete disorder after that instant, than it is that our perception of the universe as a persistent entity through time is correct.
Yep.
---
thats just bullshit that universtity-attending stoners use to try to get chicks to fuck them.
its also just as likely that all of existence as we know it is the acid-flashback of a giant, plucked, fur-chicken from some planet in the andromeda galaxy, and that when this chicken shakes off the flashback, life as we all know it will cease to ekist, having been merely the demented false dream of a giant dog-bird animal all along.
wow. im so fucking deep. hand me a nobel prize and buy my fucking book.
dont forget to pass the billy.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2009-10-29 18:13:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"The Fabric of the Cosmos" is a bit more mind boggling than "A Brief History of Time", if that's possible. I highly recommend it.
Example: It is trillions of times more likely that our universe has arranged itself into its current form (planets, suns, us etc), from nothing, for less than a nanosecond, that all our "memories" are false and that the universe will return to complete disorder after that instant, than it is that our perception of the universe as a persistent entity through time is correct.
Yep.
Submitted by JoeyG (user info) at 2009-10-29 17:53:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by The_Drake (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:13:55 GMT (#)
Ranking: 2
Actually, Pretty sweet stuff.
Don't know if it actually interests you, but have you ever read "A brief history of time"?
Awesome book. Astrophysics in layman's terms. Theory of relativity, etc. Fucking awesome read
-----------
Didn't read, but listened - I found a torrent download that played the book in his own robotic voice.
It was awesome.
Submitted by redskieslookfake (user info) at 2009-10-29 17:51:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Seen this ages and ages ago. It was mildly interesting then, since then I think I've got over my wonder of how little some things are in comparison to other things.
I think this blasé attitude towards tiny things developed around the time I thought about your teeny tiny little brain.
You are no kulturbearer.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:59:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Is this beyond the realm of things you understand, Reddy? It's okay junior bear.
Submitted by redskieslookfake (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:55:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
uh huh
Submitted by Lib (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:49:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:46:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
yeah, finally went over to mlb.com and a couple other baseball places i visit and watched some clips. not sure i'd label it as 'amazing', but... very good outing. way to prove a point for his team. hope the rest of the series has some more dramatics though.
and he's still the only good starter you guys have
:)
Submitted by BLITZKREIG_BOB (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:28:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
*frame
(herp derp)
Submitted by BLITZKREIG_BOB (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:27:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm dissappointed.
I kept expecting the next from to be a chocolate starfish, with "Uranus" written underneath it in bold text.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:06:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Reaganomics were the shit, man! Phils in 4! Also, please tell me you at least saw the highlight of Cliff Lee's amazing backhanded catch last night.
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2009-10-29 16:01:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
how many reagan debt years is it? and please convert accordingly for inflation.
:)
Submitted by skrapmetal (user info) at 2009-10-29 15:43:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
13 billion light years away. That's about six nonillion, four hundred fifty-one octillion, seven hundren septillion phallic thrusts away. Or at $1/light year, that's one one-hundredth of an Obama Debt Year away. Space is fun.
Submitted by willartstorg (user info) at 2009-10-29 15:05:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:22:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Yep. And given the vastness of the whole thing chances are incredibly high that none of it will ever find us. Most of it is likely bacteria anyways.
======
The study of Biology/Microbiology is mostly based on evolution. Those tiny little prokaryotes may just evolve into big, black, ugly motherfuckers who want to kill you(us).
Agreed, the odds of Earth having the only life in the universe is exceedingly low. . .
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:44:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
This is saying that VW Cephei is the largest known star but here http://www.ubersite.com/m/123570 it is saying that VY Canis Majoris is the biggest. Anyone know about this?
Submitted by RoadSong (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:25:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
This is why we can't be the only ones....
{sweet graphics here}
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:23:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by MudWhistle (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:03:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Percentages would tell us that it would be impossible (or nearly) for what happened to create life on earth.....hasn't happened somewhere else amongst the universe.
------------------------
There is no accurate way to get a "percentage" for the likelyhood of earth.
Ask my personal opinion, and I am sure there is life.
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:22:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Yep. And given the vastness of the whole thing chances are incredibly high that none of it will ever find us. Most of it is likely bacteria anyways.
Submitted by MudWhistle (user info) at 2009-10-29 14:03:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I almost took off a point because I expected a shot of Urbane's vagina.
people can't logical defend the idea that we are alone in the universe.
Percentages would tell us that it would be impossible (or nearly) for what happened to create life on earth.....hasn't happened somewhere else amongst the universe.
Submitted by kitchens_closed (user info) at 2009-10-29 13:39:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I just took a test in my astronomy class last night...the timing of this post is very appropriate. Coincidence +2.
Submitted by LoooseSprocket (user info) at 2009-10-29 13:35:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:55:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
suck
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:42:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Here faggots....I posted this one by accident but equally as impressive: http://www.ubersite.com/m/123570
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:35:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Carl Sagan, Billions and Billions.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:31:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
EI wants to fuck, but does he want to be fucked or fuck me? EI?
Submitted by EmissionImpossible (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:25:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
NERD
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:18:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by The_Drake (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:13:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Actually, Pretty sweet stuff.
Don't know if it actually interests you, but have you ever read "A brief history of time"?
Awesome book. Astrophysics in layman's terms. Theory of relativity, etc. Fucking awesome read.
---------
I've thumbed through it but never gave it a full pause. I've been reading a book by Guy Murchie called "The Seven Mysteries of Life" about once a year for the past 8 years that is pretty good. It doesn't quite explain the depths of the cosmos as much as it gets into a philosophical take on science. It really is a good read. T.S. Elliot's "A Brief History of the World" was a good read too, but that is basically a history book from creation on.
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2009-10-29 12:15:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
This is dreadfully out of character.
Submitted by X54 (user info) at 2009-10-29 11:38:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
God created everything 4,000 years ago. He put those pictures in the Hubble telescope to test our faith.
YOU ALL FAIL.
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 11:25:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 11:19:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:39:01 WST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:27:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Please someone humour me and explain it. Do I feel small because it is going to swallow earth? or is it something else entirely?
===================
ok ok its like this see, from our perpective the earth and our solar system is a MASSIVE thing to consider. The distance between us (meaning the earth) and the closest planet by our standards is impossibly far. This is meant to try and give some perpective on the size of the universe as we know it. In my opinion the human brain cant really comprehend how large a thing the universe is. I mean in reality you may have to think of our sun as a grain of sand in shovel that is our galaxy, but when you consider the entire universe there are literally BILLIONS of shovels that are so far away that their LIGHT takes 13 billion years to get to us, traveling as fast as physically possible.
-------------------
Oh yeah, you are right too much for me to comprehend. I never did well at normal physics, let alone being able to get astrophysics.
====================
astrophysics I think deals with an untestable reality. It can only go so far. I mean think about it, eventually you cant learn anymore about something simply by "watching" it.
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 11:19:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 22:39:01 WST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:27:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Please someone humour me and explain it. Do I feel small because it is going to swallow earth? or is it something else entirely?
===================
ok ok its like this see, from our perpective the earth and our solar system is a MASSIVE thing to consider. The distance between us (meaning the earth) and the closest planet by our standards is impossibly far. This is meant to try and give some perpective on the size of the universe as we know it. In my opinion the human brain cant really comprehend how large a thing the universe is. I mean in reality you may have to think of our sun as a grain of sand in shovel that is our galaxy, but when you consider the entire universe there are literally BILLIONS of shovels that are so far away that their LIGHT takes 13 billion years to get to us, traveling as fast as physically possible.
-------------------
Oh yeah, you are right too much for me to comprehend. I never did well at normal physics, let alone being able to get astrophysics.
Submitted by messmind (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:59:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Don't underestimate the importance of nothing.
You'll find this interresting : http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091028/sc_afp/astronomyspacebigbang_20091028233220
And i'm wondering about this : with this technique of looking at old waves, will they be able to look before the big bang? My guess is yes, but prove me wrong.
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:39:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:27:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Please someone humour me and explain it. Do I feel small because it is going to swallow earth? or is it something else entirely?
===================
ok ok its like this see, from our perpective the earth and our solar system is a MASSIVE thing to consider. The distance between us (meaning the earth) and the closest planet by our standards is impossibly far. This is meant to try and give some perpective on the size of the universe as we know it. In my opinion the human brain cant really comprehend how large a thing the universe is. I mean in reality you may have to think of our sun as a grain of sand in shovel that is our galaxy, but when you consider the entire universe there are literally BILLIONS of shovels that are so far away that their LIGHT takes 13 billion years to get to us, traveling as fast as physically possible.
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:27:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Please someone humour me and explain it. Do I feel small because it is going to swallow earth? or is it something else entirely?
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:24:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by The_Drake (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:13:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Actually, Pretty sweet stuff.
Don't know if it actually interests you, but have you ever read "A brief history of time"?
Awesome book. Astrophysics in layman's terms. Theory of relativity, etc. Fucking awesome read.
==================
I've read it multiple times, its incredible.
sitting on my coffee table as we speak.
Hawking is amazing.
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:19:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Or, this is all just make believe bullshit. That's also an option.
Submitted by SgtHartman (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:15:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I fucking love shit like this.
Submitted by The_Drake (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:13:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Actually, Pretty sweet stuff.
Don't know if it actually interests you, but have you ever read "A brief history of time"?
Awesome book. Astrophysics in layman's terms. Theory of relativity, etc. Fucking awesome read.
Submitted by TuTs (user info) at 2009-10-29 10:12:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Why is it going to eat us?