Tao of Steve: Individual Acceptance of Self-Sacrifice pt 2 (350 hits)
Category: GeneralRating: 1 on 4 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by sharpie <tiny-weiner.at.hugeballs.com> (View user info) at 2004-03-23 11:33:08 EST
http://www.ubersite.com/m/28047 pt 1
Same applies, not my work... posted for a friend who can hardly work a toaster, let alone a computer.
And now, Tao of Steve: Individual Acceptance of Self-Sacrifice pt 2:
If our people are in truth unable to fill this void, which only imperfection allows, with the most of encompassing harmony, then perhaps our people are not to be granted the 'unalienable' right of contribution. By this I mean merely (internally) overcome and banished from the common consciousness; if an ideal is not followed, it loses it's seeming intrinsic worth, and cannot damage that which it touches not, therefore perishing of it's own naturalistically selective accord. Through the necessities of species regulation and elimination of the corruption of the mental gene pool, by the individual, might stasis be regained. If the human race is to survive and prosper (in a multi-dimensional entirety), then these 'drags on the momentum of progress' must be superceded.
Might not it benefit the whole of the earth to be rid of these secure and ensconced humanistic ideals that allow for meaningless internal cruelty and enslavement while denying, through the paradisiacal or reincarnative ideals, the divinity of ultimate death itself? Every organization of externally displaced power, disguised as either salvatory religion or philanthropic government, must eradicate the potential threat of harmonious death and descent; might this not be but the fear of the mob, personified, displaced, and certified? If a man, or a group of men, is unable to transcend, or at least act in the face of, these terrors, then their ineffectual preventative actions become a hindrance and a burden upon those who would walk into the full potential that our people might, if accepting of lasting and ultimately selfless perceptions, become.
Perhaps narrow monotonous action is the only enslaver of men. When once an act brought forth some inherent good, has not the repetition of that act become desirable? Just as the addict must preserve his semblance of freedom through the escape of his drug, so too, must we indulge in the results of the thralldom of our actions, endlessly repeated in an attempt to prolong the initial pleasing reward that we had received through our labors. But that we should awaken to our ignorant self-service, and stand away from the benefits that (once possibly beneficial) have become the bane of our liberty, we shall remain enslaved. To break the bonds of habit is to break the chains of selfish stability and certainty. Are we not addicted to the excess of luxury that our habits are directed toward? Should we not seek to liberate our energies from this well-costumed entrapment and step out into the necessary anarchy of freedom incarnate, thus serving but the universal? Definite human law must fail in the face of virulent contemplation, else the question should sink into the mire of dogmatic and selfish answer.
to be continued............
*****************************
I know you're on the edge of your seat with this one, only about 5 or 6 more parts........If you read it, please review, I am collecting all of the reviews and giving them to Steve (the author) he is trying to gauge people reaction to this stuff. If you like it, say so. If you hate it, say so.
The other Tao of Steve:'s can be found-
http://www.ubersite.com/m/27651
http://www.ubersite.com/m/27805
-adam
User Reviews
Submitted by Systematicevil (user info) at 2004-05-16 13:01:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by sharpie (user info) at 2004-03-23 13:25:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Tak,
I agree. I have told him this, and this has been dumbed down. And I can assure you that this is not a "corny" cover up. Ass.
-adam
Submitted by I_Have_a_Kristen_Fetish (user info) at 2004-03-23 13:09:35 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
Yes... I'm on the edge of my seat... But, it's only because I have a Creatine shit brewin'.
Submitted by TaK (user info) at 2004-03-23 12:52:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Tell your friend, if indeed it is your friend and not you using a corny cover-up,
that he tries way too fucking hard to sound intelligent. The view he is trying
to get across could be expressed in a much more concise, far more simple, man to man,
down to earth kind of way. As a matter of fact, it is the only way he will get his
point across because, as you see, no one wants to read someone so hard to hear.