Felix The Cat and His Unfortunate Encounter with the Crazed Female Porn Star (1018 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -0.53 on 18 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Pommeranna De Cravitz (View user info) at 2004-09-02 07:47:29 EDT
My apologies. This has nothing to do with Felix The Cat. This is a psychological experiment investigating the relationship between post title, post content, ratings and reviews. The following hypothesis will be tested:
Hypothesis 1: This post will get relatively many hits (as in over 100)
Hypothesis 2: This post will get relatively few reviews (as in less than 20)
Hypothesis 3: The majority of ratings of reviews will be negative.
Hypothesis 4: Those ratings of reviews which are not negative will be included by nasty people whose sole reason for rating positively is to prove me wrong.
Thankyou for participating
User Reviews
Submitted by Electro (user info) at 2004-10-07 23:11:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Bad
Submitted by Arm_The_Homeless (user info) at 2004-10-07 22:17:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
You seem to have insulated yourself well with your multiple scenarios.
And the opening statement made me happy.
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2004-10-07 22:01:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
This did make me smile...only because there is something about you I cannot shake. You are like some ethereal and enigmatic character from a Herman Hesse novel. I wonder what you're really like.
Submitted by steph (user info) at 2004-09-08 08:05:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
where's my felix the cat?!
Submitted by Rocket_stapler (user info) at 2004-09-08 07:52:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Well, looking at the hit numbers, the number of reviews and the ratings that you've recieved I guess you were right. Good Job propertie. at least you write shit that isn't shit like those others shits!! rock on!
Submitted by Electro (user info) at 2004-09-02 12:53:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
dumbass.
Submitted by Avals (user info) at 2004-09-02 12:46:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Hypothesis 1: This post will get relatively many hits (as in over 100)
- Over 100 is not "many hits." A post titled "I Ate Bread Today" would get more than 100 hits.
Hypothesis 3: The majority of ratings of reviews will be negative.
- Of course they will; this sucked!
If you are searching for the secrets of hit-whoring, there is much I can teach you. This, however, is useless.
Submitted by charger (user info) at 2004-09-02 11:15:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Of course it is getting negative ratings - you are wasting everyone's time with your fucking experiment. You want to experiment? Go to a chem lab. Get the bottle label HCl. Drink it.
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2004-09-02 10:52:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Cats stink.
Submitted by xenon (user info) at 2004-09-02 10:40:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Waste of time?
Yes
Submitted by WillZone (user info) at 2004-09-02 09:15:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
SPT
Submitted by Kent_Weirdo (user info) at 2004-09-02 08:32:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
No Felix the Cat? You disappoint me.
Submitted by DeathJester (user info) at 2004-09-02 08:29:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
I approve thoroughly of what you doing. There is a lot of "HitWhoring" on this site, and you're proving that it is a real problem. If I was wearing a hat, I would take it off too you.
However, we already know this, so don't expect to be praised when you figure out what we already know.
Submitted by WhatTheHell (user info) at 2004-09-02 08:26:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
hashdy sdks ksd js asfjsdfj sdfk, sfkksdf fksqfqwfeas-sdfkj.Rsdfjdfjsjdf sdfk mcvbku sdfjg,sdfj j lapiodfj......EHFHSDFH!!
Submitted by propertie_fenspost (user info) at 2004-09-02 08:14:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Hypothesis 5: People will give neutral ratings, because I didn't say anything about neutral ratings in my post.
And I know telling people my hypothesis' affects the results. It's called subject bias. But if I didn't put them in I wouldn't have a post.
Submitted by jojojojoan (user info) at 2004-09-02 08:07:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
If you tell people your hypothesis it usually doesn't turn out that way.
Submitted by propertie_fenspost (user info) at 2004-09-02 07:55:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Then your contribution is useless. Thanks anyway
Submitted by G_Nonny (user info) at 2004-09-02 07:50:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
What if I rate in a neutral sense?