why don't they censor books?? (1418 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -0.24 on 84 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by jailbait (View user info) at 2004-09-15 05:19:46 EDT
hi ubersite
this is my first post
i can see you are a very hip and sophisticated bunch of people, so i'm sure you won't hold it against me that i'm a thirteen year old chick from the wrong side of the tracks
btw, i should say up front: best not to hit on me, it's probably against the law. though i'm not sure about that. i mean, i might just be a sicko 40 year old man or something, in which case 'cybering' with me would be quite legal. and for that matter, what is cybering?? writing rude words.
actually, this relates to the topic of my post, which is: why don't they censor books?
i can walk into any supermarket in the country and buy a copy of cosmo or cleo and read all about g spots and anal sex and whether or not shaving my cunt is a fashion faux pas.
worse still, i can walk into any bookshop in country and read about whatever i want. the sickest most twisted sexual and violent stuff imaginable. i may only be thirteen, but i'm very literate.
why am i allowed to do this? i'm banned from watching all kinds of movies and they try and stop be looking at internet porn.
why can i read sicko books, and even get them for free from the library????
is it because words are less powerful than images? in which case, why can't i have 'cyber sex'?
or is it because the adult world is completley STUPID, as it appears to my naiive eyes?
btw, re the 'cybering', regarless of its legal status, i don't really go for it. except with literary geniuses of course.
User Reviews
Submitted by kuroneko_sama (user info) at 2006-11-02 06:14:50 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
basically there is a point where we have rating systems for videogames, movies, music, websites.... there is no rating scale for books aside from the basic "fiction/non fiction/romance/sci fi/ public interest, etc... aside from the blatantly adult magazines, and things like that book madonna put out... but i am beginning to wonder, if you sent a 13 year old in to buy a book on kama sutra, would they deny them the right to that purchase, if so, could they be sued for denying that... also if they did sell it, what repercussions would there be?
(considering comendeering a 13 year old to go on a kama sutra buying mission)
realy im sure it would make headlines if this was attempted and the child denied.
i already know a 14 year old that read "pornucopia" by piers anthony (basically king missile's detachible penis song mixed with a hitchikers guide to the galaxy environment and a lord of the rings style quest. some dude is searching for his crank)
i wonder where that line is and if someone is going to capitolise on the exploitation.
oh yeah.... you're about as 13 as i am not a ginger
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2006-11-02 05:21:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
There is really only one person who would try to pass as a young girl by writing the word 'hip', using multiple question marks and then flagrantly using the word cunt.
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2004-09-19 13:05:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by hamilton (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:44:09 (#)
Ranking: 1
You're thirteen? I am too.
Let's hook up sometime, hit me at ubermethod on AIM
------------
oh dear!
Submitted by Lady_in_the_radiator (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:53:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Good for a first post. Would have liked it even more if capitalization was utilized.
Submitted by hamilton (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:48:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I was six when I got my first Playboy, and I was the only person in my fifth grade class who knew what anal was.
And look at how screwed up I am.
Submitted by hamilton (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:44:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
You're thirteen? I am too.
Let's hook up sometime, hit me at ubermethod on AIM
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:38:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
I am hoping this is not shenanigans but:
If you are 13 you... seem quite intelligent. I do hope to see you post
interesting things on Uber.
Words of advice... Don't use things like:
lol, roflmao, btw, 4eva, and other such things. These poeple will eat
you alive.
wtf is okay.
Punctuation, capitalizations, and spelling/gramattical errors with piss people
off. Try to proof read.
welcome to uber.
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2004-09-19 12:33:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
Hearing "shave my cunt" from a thirteen year old made me puke in my mouth.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-17 07:19:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
positivley amazing
Submitted by CoachMagirk27 (user info) at 2004-09-16 21:51:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Do you like hairy men? I'm 54.
Submitted by StonedSilly (user info) at 2004-09-16 21:34:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Do you like older men?
I'm 16..
Submitted by stevie_says (user info) at 2004-09-16 21:16:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Censorship is a tough topic. I hate it, personally, because censorship seems to make things taboo, until some one slips up and a shit-storm insues. Now, after the shit-wave hits the shit-beaches of our shitcities and everyone is under mounds of shit it is only then that they realized that they were the ones who started the shit-storm in the first place, by building the shit-damn that eventually cracked under the pressure of shit.
Shut up, Steve. Your metaphors are shitty.
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2004-09-15 16:19:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Shandynanigans.
Submitted by RamJetMax (user info) at 2004-09-15 14:32:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Shenaningans
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2004-09-15 12:54:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
To paraphrase Dan Aykroyd... Jailbait, you ignorant slut!
You should be banned for writing the single stupidest thing I've read on Ubersite so far (and that's saying something)--
"...reading is somehow regarded as a good thing ..."
Submitted by Garet_Jax (user info) at 2004-09-15 11:35:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
jailbait, you made a good point in the beginning and I thought you were bringing up the fact that censorship is futile if not done completely, so ultimately it is useless. However, after reading your comments below I realize you actually feel everything should be censored. Censorship of media is just as useless as physical censorship (banning drugs and guns and things of that nature). By outlawing something it just makes it more likely to end up in the wrong hands. If you start banning questionable books, people will be curious as to what is inside that could be so terrible/interesting...
Hey, maybe that would be just the thing to get people to read. Ok, I change my mind, lets outlaw written material! Book sales should skyrocket, authors would get paid more due to inflated black-market prices, and more people who desperately need some literary influence would get it.
So let it be written, so let it be done.
Submitted by QueenAshlee (user info) at 2004-09-15 11:22:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Well, I was going to mark this with my famous -2 and bitchy comment, but since so many of the new kids are pussies who can't handle that and freak out on me (yes, just me, regardless of how many other people also think they're douches), I'll actually be nice.
First of all, they DO censor books:
http://www.ubersite.com/m/15897
Now. Let's take some more information into consideration here. It's not against any law for you to view violent or sexually explicit material. You aren't allowed into PG or R movies, alone, true. But, if you're with a parent or guardian, you're more than welcome to waste eight bucks and two hours of your life on whatever crap they're showing these days. Likewise, if your parent allows you to view questionable materiel at home, that's their decision. These laws are in place to ensure not that children aren't being exposed to these things, but rather that their exposure is left to the discretion of whomever's been charged with raising them. The same, in most cases, with literature.
In some states, you are unable, under a certain age, to get a library card without a parent's signature. Also, if you're under sixteen at least, most would assume that you are accompanied by a parent when in the library, due to most library rules and the fact that you can't drive (and god forbid one of you get off your lazy ass and WALK. I've seen people charged with child abuse because they wouldn't drive their kid somewhere and told them if they wanted to go they'd walk). Thus it is assumed that your parent approved whatever book/magazine you've chosen. Naturally, some kids will go off and do whatever the fuck they want anyway, but this often isn't taken into account when these decisions are made by whoever makes them.
Most censorship is in place to prevent kids from doing/seeing things unapproved by your parents. You can pretty much do what you want, provided mom is ok with it and with going along for the ride.
Submitted by Donitsu2002 (user info) at 2004-09-15 11:05:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
a.) Shenaningans, what 13 year old girl's username is "jailbait"? A name usually used solely on my little brother
b.) the reason they dont censor books is so ignorant dolts like the one behind your keyboard can read them and expand their small minds to a point where they can pass Junior high with a C average.
C.) Die
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2004-09-15 11:01:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
what loki said
Submitted by mr.awesome (user info) at 2004-09-15 10:57:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
The number of people who died so that you could read Cosmo and not Nazi propaganda number in the millions. Show some some respect, bitch. My blood always boils when someone suggests censoring even the smallest portion of a book. I hate Catcher in the Rye, but I became infuriated when I read about attempts to censor it, and felt extreme pleasure when I realized that most of those people were dead.
Submitted by loki (user info) at 2004-09-15 09:48:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Uh because the Nazis lost?
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2004-09-15 09:34:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
jailbait, i notice youir'e willig to cyber with 'literary geniuses'
well, i'm regarded as the residetn lterary genius here
here's the deal: first of all, you must state that you are really a fourty year old man pretendig to be a thirteen year old girl. then you must send some pics which you must say are pics of yourself masturbating etc, but in fact you must 'let slip' that they are really just legal pics yuoku got from the internet
then we can do some dirty talking.
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2004-09-15 09:27:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Thought-provoking, but since there aren't any kids here in America that like to read anything but Harry Potter, I don't think it's much of an issue.
Plus, I think children between the ages of 10 and 17 are too often sheltered from R-rated material for no reason. Extreme and unnecessary violence is something that kids that age probably shouldn't see, but children in junior high school shouldn't be restricted from a potentially enlightening film simply because there is some nudity or foul language.
Of course, none of this applies to the cheesy R-rated teen comedies that Hollywood regurgitates every summer, which generally have nothing to offer.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:55:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i woudln't be too harsh on mystia
she is clearly mad, but sideburns drove her to it
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:20:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
that mistia certainly seems to be a cunt
Submitted by Fleadh (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:09:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 cos I cant fucking believe that a cunt like mistia would give a revenge -2 when shes's never posted anything, man, what a cunt.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:06:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The Jaunt is, I think, in Skeleton Crew.
And Fuckface, I wasn't saying it was a great series. I was saying that it's a children's series, for children, and liable to be deemed 'inappropriate' under any kind of censorship. It was the first example to come to mind.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:04:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
That is the worst series of books probably ever. The whole concept is unbelieveable, considering the narrator is supposed to remember every single conversation and event over months when it comes time to record it. That guy writes like a turd.
Submitted by Scotsman (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:03:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
In the UK there are adult sections. I don't know the cut off point regarding age. That said there is nothing to stop kids buying books in a bookshop.
However if kids are intelligent enough and literate enough to read books of an adult level they will probably be fine.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 08:02:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I have never read the jaunt
i thought i had read all his shorts.
who is apollo? and why would he cyber?
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:58:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know why, but the idea of censoring books is abhorrent. It brings to mind puritan book burnings and religious zealots.
It's too slippery a slope. You start with Jackie Collins and end up banning anything that could be remotely construed as inappropriate.
John Marsden's childrens series "Tomorrow, When the War Began" is rife with violence, adult emotions, and rebellion. And as soon as we start labelling books as inappropriate, things like this will be gone and barred from children's view.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:54:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
yes, reading is somehow regarded as a good thing
and maybe it is?
reading widely, anway?
but a jackie collin's novel? as a guide to a twelve year old?
and don't say we should trust parents. if that's the case, we should trust parents to filter what movies kids see, rather than have government laws
i think libraries should have special adults only sections
and governmetn committees to decide what goes in and out of those sections
Submitted by Random Joe at 2004-09-15 07:54:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
It's because any moron who is not blind can watch television and act like they have a meaningful opinion (on the acceptable nature of what they viewed). However, most morons don't bother with books. Reading is just too much work. All those big words and complex ideas make their heads hurt. Better to just watch American Idol.
Submitted by Avals (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:53:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Shenanigans. Pretty good shenanigans, but shenanigans nontheless -- 13 year-olds who don't capitalize don't use words like 'facetious'.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:50:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Yeah, that's what my parents said, too.
"Peter, she's eleven. Should she be reading Stephen King?"
"At least she's reading."
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:49:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I think it just comes down to: if your kid is reading something, no matter how offensive it is, at least your dumb shit kid is reading instead of concentrating air freshener spray into paper cones then sniffing it.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:47:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Jailbait, they've tried banning books. It makes a lot of people really, really cranky and given the rapidly declining literacy rate, it probably seems like a pointless exercise.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:45:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You know, choosing the most vividly frightening thing I ever read was a low blow.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:45:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
so, why is it that books have slipped through the net of the censors??
is it that books are just regarded as being a minority thing?
under the radar?
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:43:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The difference between books and movies are that movies can't describe some horrors that books can. It sounds lame the way I describe it, but what which you would rather: getting murdered or being stuck anywhere for eternity? A movie can portray a murder, but that is all it is limited to. I don't want to turn this into a books vs. movies debate, but in terms of horror a book will win over a movie any day.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:43:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
bullshit circe
it was the masters WORDS that seared your brain
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:40:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fuckface - That story is seared into my brain. I read it when I was fourteen, I think. And, yes, that final scene where the boy was ancient and insane and gibbering (I believe that was the first time I ever came across that word) provoked a visceral reaction. It was obscene and awful.
On the other hand, I think that seeing it on a television screen would, at fourteen, have had the same - probably greater - gut level impact with none of the fascination or thought that went with reading it.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:34:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
fuckface, good work
i hope circe sees your point, it is a fine one!!!!!
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:33:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I remember that Stephen King short story 'The Jaunt'. I have yet to see a movie that could scare the shit out of me like that story did. It gave me nightmares for days, and whenever I thought about it I would feel sick to the stomache.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:31:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
That ego of yours is staggering.
"The pen is mightier than the sword" is a lovely little phrase which means exactly three tenths of a fuck all. The time it takes to build an image to a level that could be deemed 'frightening' to a child is not comparable to the two seconds it takes for a television to flash some godawful scene of torture and horror. The option to stop reading is there, which is simply not the case with something you're merely looking at.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:29:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
obviously i was being facetiousus in my presenetation of this question, but it IS odd, do'nt you thknk. and i don't think you can explain it away by saying you might be exposed to images on a tv anwyere anytime. we are banned from seeing adult movies, but not adult books
thank fruck for small mercies, but why???
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:27:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i for one believe
"the pen is mightier than the sword"
i've read apollo and shandy
i would cyber with shandy, but not that repulsive apollo
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:22:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Okay, fuck it. The point is worth debating even though it IS shenanigans.
The difference between said kid reading American Psycho and watching it on TV is that thd is brutally assaulted with graphic images of blood and dismemberment and rape. Yes, the words are there, but if the kid feels disturbed he can put the damn book down; it isn't seared into his brain in a matter of seconds.
That said, I read a lot of shit I shouldn't have and never once put the book down. But I could have.
Submitted by cat_head (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:13:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
She has a point. If a ten year old tries to buy "American Psycho" he will probably get it.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:06:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
so jailbait is a faggot as well!
how can she be a faggot?
sheis a girl.
i think, unless sheis some sicko pretending.
OH! you mean lesbian!
Submitted by Sideburns (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:06:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
That would make sense.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:04:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Or they're both shandy.
Actually, that would make sense.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:03:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
ah so shandy is a term for faggot.
thankyou kirstenfetish.
I am not a shandy!
I have a girlfriend!
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:02:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
jailbait - shandy
TheRateMachine - Apollo.
I would think.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:01:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
ah OK.
bit of a sweeping statement though.
you have been rated.
Submitted by I_Have_a_Kristen_Fetish (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:01:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:59:19 (#)
Ranking: 2
is shandy an ubersite term?
like asshat?
why are you calling me shandy?
---
Shandy is slang for fagot here.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:00:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I am not saying I am offended by the word. By all means, it has a nice ring to it. I am not American. What I am saying is, books containing words like that go hand in hand with shitty writing.
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2004-09-15 07:00:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
haha jailbait. Ill still give you one.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:59:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
is shandy an ubersite term?
like asshat?
why are you calling me shandy?
Submitted by Sideburns (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:57:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
theratemachine= shandy
heh.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:55:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
who is shandy?
is he someone who writes good stuff?
All I have seen on this site is shit.
can you direct me to some good posters?
Submitted by Sideburns (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:51:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Circe-- That's what I was about to say.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:50:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
professorfuckface :
you are wrong. are you american by any chance?
they have more sensitive sensibilities than the civilized world.
Religious nuts the lot of them.
You have been rated.
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:49:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
...Shandy?
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:38:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know any decent authors who use the word 'cunt' in their novels. I started reading this book called 'The Revolutionist' by some asshole, the author had a fetish for the word. Needless to say, I never finished that piece of shit.
Submitted by JungleJane (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:35:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:56:20 (#)
Ranking: 0
i see, so pickupability of the filthy porno sicko violent shit is the key factor in the censor's minds?
when i wa 12 i picked up a book by a cock called brett eastin ellis or something. his book was all about rats being shoven up women's cunts
should i have been shielded from this????
of course, i don't think i should have been
but its interesting that society apparently agrees with me
----------------------------------------------------
It's called Mass Communications, study it when you get to university. It's not pickupability- it's the fact that you choose to pick it up, the fact that you choose to read it. With tv there are too many risk factors for the networks involved. And stop swearing so much, you've got one shitload of pottymouth on you- from a 13 year old it just seems like you're trying too hard.
Submitted by TheRateMachine (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:33:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I am the Rate Machine and you have been rated.
This is a good point, in many ways the images are worse in books.
I read a book by James Herberts called 'Domain' (the third in his rats trilogy) when I was 8.
It was my dads, he didn't know I was reading it until I asked him 'Dad, what is a cunt?'.
fair play to him though he didn't shirk it.
society is hypocritical and inconsistent.
nothing new.
Submitted by Sideburns (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:32:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
This kid might be only 13, but I like this kid. She's a smartass. She has potential.
Have a +2, smartass.
:D
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:28:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
circe, aren't you being a little hostile?
try to read between the lines a bit
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:26:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
They do.
There are some schools that have banned 'The Catcher in the Rye' from libraries, among others.
The reason the ban doesn't extend to bookshops and public libraries is because parents are damned well SUPPOSED to know what their kids are reading, and monitor it accordingly.
This, of course, is bullshit. Meh.
So was your post.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:21:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
-0.56 on 14 reviews???
what the fuck is going on?
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:14:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
what actions??
i really didn't mean to set mystia off!!!!
it was just a little joke - i noticed she is sometimes careless over the whole string of plus2 nonsense.
yes, i've had a few cones, so i guess i've been attention seeking a bit.
but sersiusly, don't you think this is an interesing point i raise?
Submitted by Sideburns (user info) at 2004-09-15 06:08:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You're very mature for a 13 year old, I'll give you that-- but your actions on other posts show that you're still too immature for this site.
Prove me wrong.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:56:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i see, so pickupability of the filthy porno sicko violent shit is the key factor in the censor's minds?
when i wa 12 i picked up a book by a cock called brett eastin ellis or something. his book was all about rats being shoven up women's cunts
should i have been shielded from this????
of course, i don't think i should have been
but its interesting that society apparently agrees with me
Submitted by JungleJane (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:48:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
The reason books and magazines aren't censored is because you actually have to pick them up to read them- it's your choice. TV is censored because it flashes messages at your unwilling self. A 13 year old kid could be watching for God's sake.
Submitted by funk_boy (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:48:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Blatant shenanigans.
Submitted by Method (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:48:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:37:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
actually, mystia, sister, i'm a bit dissappointed in you
how old are you?
mid twenties?
surely you know better than to minus 2 a post as revenge for a comment you didn't like
this post raises an intersting issue, never raised before on uber, OR ANYWHERE THAT I KNOW OF (ie, its actually quite original) and yet all you can manage is a spiteful minus 2
shame on you sister, shame on you
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:31:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
well you ARE mystia
sister, i've seen you do it so many times!
respect.
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:30:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
and no, i'm here to stay
but dude, try and get over the excitement of talkign to a thirteen year old chick, and address the issue!
Submitted by mystiamoon (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:29:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:24:08 (#)
Ranking: 2
mystia is ALWAYS ruining people's perfect scores
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:28:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
cool name fuckface
Submitted by jailbait (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:27:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
what's the fuckig deal with this '0 worth reading' rating fuck head???
are you a spammer?
is it because i haven't earnt my name yet????
fuck you ubersite with all you stupid cliques.
i try and give you something worhtwhile and this is what i get in return??
zero????????????????????
worth reading??????????????????????
actually, sorry about that
now i think about it, 'worth reading' is actually quite a nice compliment
thanks dude!
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:26:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Shenanigans.
Is this a two-part shenanigans where you post some crap in your first post then some more crap and camwhore in the second?
Submitted by triple_optics (user info) at 2004-09-15 05:22:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Yeah, see where you're coming from