Why I don't hate gays (1402 hits)
Category: RomanceRating: 1.57 on 10 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Fr057m0urn3 (View user info) at 2004-11-29 09:38:19 EST
Christmas is nearing, so I'm going to spread some joy and cheer here. Before anyone calls me a faggot-lover or something, please be reminded that not hating someone doesn't mean you like the person. I just hate people for more important reasons than sexual orientation or skin colour for that matter. For the slow: I've no qualms about hating gays, but not because they're gays. Oh by the way, "gays" here refer to homosexuals in general.
1) Gays can be as productive as everyone else.
Cut the sniggers, I'm referring to economic production here. As long as they continue to contribute to their companies and to the economy, don't evade taxes or crash the market, they're useful people. All humans are factors of production anyway, so it's better to have a hardworking gay one than a useless straight person who smoked and fought his teenage years away.
2) I don't give half a shit if their lifestyle is "selfish".
People have called the homosexual lifestyle selfish because they don't reproduce and contribute to the next generation. To which I say, what's wrong with that? Think about it, do we honestly need a next generation? Stop being such a mindless tool. Why do you think there are so many programmes that glorify "people who devote their lives to others"? Because everyone else is a lazy leech (like me) sitting around waiting to benefit from the selflessness (I actually prefer to call it stupidity, but that's just me) of others. Those who preach living for your community are as selfish as the people who they condemn for not serving the community.
Here's my advice: Live a life devoted to... yourself (Gasp!). I for one won't feel any guilt for making myself as happy as possible, then pissing off from this earth. What's the point of leaving behind a few screaming brats who will get fucked up the ass by their own shitty generation anyway? Sure, my potential kid may find the cure for AIDS, but he has a greater chance of making the headlines as a serial rapist. And even if he does find a cure for AIDS, I'm already 6 feet under the ground.
What does all that have to do with not hating gays? Well, not reproducing is not selfish. Even if society condemns it as such, they're a bunch of selfish frauds who just got their shit ruined.
3) Keep on rocking in the free world.
Basically, I don't care if Mr X is banging Mr Y in the ass right now. It's their personal right to do so, within the limits of not harming others. It may be proven that they have a higher chance of getting AIDS, but the most likely way to get that disease is through sexual intercourse, and straight people won't fuck gays anyway. Not to mention that sex for lesbians is actually safer than heterosexual sex, since I don't think tongues or clean dildos carry the HIV virus. And even if they wipe themselves out through rampant sex, it is hardly my concern. So I won't begrudge them their personal freedom.
One big qualifier here though, I will be against them if they choose to have gay sex, end up with AIDS and start living off handouts from the government, because taxpayers' money will be my money. And I'm sure as hell unwilling to pay for some retards who can't live with their own stupid actions.
4) They piss off religious fanatics.
At every gay pride parade, chances are that there will be some Christian group protesting nearby, holding signs that scream "Bum sex makes baby Jesus cry!" and thumping their Bibles. One great thing about the homosexual lifestyle is that their very existence is a big Fuck You to the religious and conservative elements in society, flushing all their anarchic values down the toilet with their shit-stained used condoms.
That image makes me smile.
User Reviews
Submitted by BadAssJulie (user info) at 2004-11-29 15:10:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
>>2) I don't give half a shit if their lifestyle is "selfish".
>>People have called the homosexual lifestyle selfish because they don't reproduce and contribute >>to the next generation.
This is actually quite hypocritical of christians and other religios people. If they believe it's selfish not to reproduce wouldn't that make nuns and other "godly people" selfish since they take an oath or a vow or whatever not to have sex? Besides, there are too many fucking people on this planet anyway. We're so overcrowded we can't even get to work without sitting in traffic for an hour and a half and kids can't get a good education because teachers don't have time to help all the children in their classes and there isn't enough money to provide new books and classrooms. If people keep reproducing at the rate they are now and keep chopping down trees to make more homes, we're going to suck up all the oxygen and die. Besides, some people have like twenty kids anyway so they kind of make up for the gays.
Anyway, I love gays too. Especially gay guys (back off, I'm a straight chick) because they're brutally honest about what you wear, how you look, etc. Plus they're full of drama and they're fucking hilarious.
Submitted by Fr057m0urn3 (user info) at 2004-11-29 12:13:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:50:09 (#)
Ranking: 2
Think about it, do we honestly need a next generation?
_____________________________________________________
i think this might have something to do with social security and all o' that jazz.
good post nonetheless.
_____________________________________________________
Yeah that's a good point. But I think a good social security system should make the present generation pay for their own old age. Singapore has the Central Provident Fund, where a compulsory amount of saving is taken directly out of your monthly paycheck into a fund which you can withdraw after retirement. Making the next generation provide for the current one is kind of unfair, can you imagine a baby born with a debt just because his useless crackhead of a father got some whore pregnant? In cases like that, it's not even a justified reason like to repay the kindness of the parents for providing a conducive growth environment or something. The kid will be a burden to his parents and vice versa. No point in that.
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:50:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Think about it, do we honestly need a next generation?
_____________________________________________________
i think this might have something to do with social security and all o' that jazz.
good post nonetheless.
Submitted by Fr057m0urn3 (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:26:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:16:02 (#)
Ranking: 2
This was fuckin sweet. I'm gonna go fuck an ass now...
__________________________________________________________
When I read this, I felt sure that beastiality would make baby Jesus cry as well.
What?
Submitted by Fr057m0urn3 (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:23:14 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
archaic, anarchic, no difference. Oh wait... big difference. I hang my spelling-failure head in shame.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:16:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
This was fuckin sweet. I'm gonna go fuck an ass now...
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:06:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Altogether well written. And the "Bum sex makes baby Jesus cry!" almost made me spit up my coffee.
Submitted by big_wigger (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:04:42 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
needs more hot gay sex to rate a +2
Submitted by mikethescottish (user info) at 2004-11-29 11:00:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Anarchic? Did you mean archaic?
Submitted by mrloadinyourface (user info) at 2004-11-29 10:37:55 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Actually gays are nothing but beneficial for straight guys, every gay couple = two more women for me