$10,000 for suggestive pics of my five year old daughter (2966 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 0.4 on 44 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Shandythedog (View user info) at 2005-01-14 08:16:45 EST
Some of you may remember that my friend Jamie was willing to pay me 1 million dollars for a handjob from my 4 yr old daughter Natashia (http://www.ubersite.com/m/42947).
His theory was that sex was inherently good and it was only our mad society that made it bad. He told me he would try and come up with some "social harm risk minimization strategies" to protect Natashia from any damage. I said I was doubtful, but would at least consider any further proposals he cared to make.
Well, yesterday Jamie gave me a call. He said he had failed. He just couldn't think of any way he could guarantee that Natashia might not suffer negative consequences if she gave him a handjob. The influence of society is just too pervasive. He has therefore given up on his dream of a handjob from my daughter, as the last thing he wants to do is cause her harm.
However, it seems his passion for her still burns and he has come up with a new proposal.
All he wants this time is some photos. Nothing nude required, but he does want them to be 'provocative', and he has suggested things like Natashia in her bikini climbing out of the pool while all wet, Natashia bending over in tight pants, Natashia dressed up in sexy clothes, Natashia by candlight, Natashia prancing about green fields, Natashia in her nightie, Natashia brushing her hair, Natashia putting on makeup, etc etc etc.
He's made it quite clear that he intends to use these photos for masturbatory purposes, and has offered me $10,000 for the first batch.
Now, once again I'm in a quandry. I can't really see any harm to Natashia coming from this, at least from Jamie. He's a good egg and as I mentioned above he has given up on the idea of actual sexual contact with Natashia, for her own good. If he wants to wank over her pics, so what? I'm sure plenty of professional child models are wanked over all around the world. And $10,000 would come in very handy.
Nevertheless, I feel a bit anxious. You see Jamie, being the honest chap he is, has TOLD me he intends to wank over these pics. And he's paying me. So even though Natashia will not be naked or anything, does this make it child pornography??? And if so, would selling him the pics put me in legal jeopardy? (And therefore of course also put my family in jeopardy: imagine the shame for Natashia and my wife if I was spashed across the front pages of the local papers as the evil child pornographer who dealt in his daughter's pictures)
I stress again there is no nudity, and certainly no raping or anything like that. People who engage in that are very nasty and should probably be shot.
What to do?
User Reviews
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2005-01-14 23:47:08 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Plenty of pics here. http://www.ubersite.com/m/56730
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2005-01-14 23:31:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I think you need to lay off the green junk.
Submitted by darko (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:26:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by jgreening (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:21:52 (#)
Ranking: -2
First.
She
nan
i
gans
============
Huh dud you figure that out all by yourself or did you read what he freaking said?
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:30:26 (#)
Ranking: 0
via the medium of fiction, i was trying to convey some of the interesting parodoxes and contradictions that are always found with taboos.
Submitted by darko (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:25:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I don't understand the uproar here. So the guy is attracted to young girls? He has already stated he has no plans on following through with these attractions.
Are you saying any guy who ever fantasizes about being forceful with at frist an unwilling partner needs to go to jail for rape?
Should anybody who wants to go kill prostitutes in grand theft auto go to jail for being a serial killer?
Should everyone who has ever been pissed off at a coworker and wantged to kill them go to jail for homocide?
A person can't help what he/she wants, only what they do through their actions. As long as someone doesn't follow through then they have done nothing wrong.
Submitted by Insanethemind (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:22:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
there are people who set up sites with provocative photos of their minor children for this very purpose, but keep in mind its all tasteful with plenty of clothing on wink wink but you know why the sites are there.
you ought to set one up
Submitted by jgreening (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:21:52 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
First.
She
nan
i
gans
Second.
What kind of sick fuck are you for this shit?
Submitted by someone (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:16:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Actually I think this is an interesting topic, and furthermore, the points you brought up in your replies were interesting shandy. I really have no clue how to intellegently respond to this, however I will say that it is an issue that should definately be looked into both legally and with your spouse.
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2005-01-14 13:04:45 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I have had this discussion a lot, i think pedos should be allowed child pon, already made child porn that is, not fresh porn.
the cut his balls off line i did for uber, i didn't actually think that.
Submitted by Insanethemind (user info) at 2005-01-14 12:48:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
your four year old daughter wears makeup?
thats almost as disturbing as this post.
Submitted by Monarch (user info) at 2005-01-14 12:07:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
"I can't really see any harm to Natashia coming from this, at least from Jamie. He's a good egg..."
--------------------------------------
Dude? Are you pyscho?
A 'good egg' wouldn't ask for a handjob from a four year old girl. Or 'provocative pictures.' Especially not when that four year old is a friends daughter. I'd have call the cops of his twisted self.
If someone is going to be a sick fuck, the least they can do is do it in private.
Submitted by Insanethemind (user info) at 2005-01-14 12:00:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
tee hee. did you get the email i sent to moronicnovel@hotmail. shandy?
respond my fine friend
Submitted by Disektor (user info) at 2005-01-14 11:55:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Do it!
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2005-01-14 11:25:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
shandy shenanigans
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:53:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
damn insomnia
a couple of important things i forgot re. the War on Immorality:
- certain tribes in mongolia will have to be invaded and subjegated because they have a custom where dad roots his daughter just prior to her marriage. apparently they justify this perversion on the grounds that because daughter loves and trusts dad, he's the best fellow to introduce her to the joys of sex.
- chimpanzes are a REAL problem. they are utterly perverted. group sex, gay sex, child sex, wanking, oral, anal, all in public all the time. i think the only solution is to kill ALL chimpanzee adults and save the babies. They can then be raised according to proper standards with Jehova's guidance
Submitted by Jeanneee (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:41:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Give him the pics, but the money belongs to your daughter. Start a trust or a college fund account or something. Just make sure SHE gets every cent of that money. Also, make sure she never, EVER finds out where the money really came from.
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:38:17 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
She's back already?
I don't think you were on Messenger once while she was gone.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:35:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
poly, rally the seppo troops!
primative jungle bunnies and coconut heads everywhere beware!
stricly speaking, we probably also should invade Japan, as they apparently have rather permissive age of consent laws.
anyway, time for bed.
satan returns tomorrow!
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:31:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:21:31 (#)
Ranking: 0
actually I think it only relates to masturbation about your neighbours Ox and/or Donkey. I dont see any specific reference to ones neighbours daughter, so I suppose its okay.
---
jamie will be relieved. i know he's been suffering lately from concerns about Jehova, to the point of denying himself ANY form of self-relief.
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:31:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Only if they have oil... I mean, oil... I mean, weapons of mass destruction (oil).
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:29:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
well, unlike pete i've never in my life looked at or searched for online child porn.
and i think he was actually found innocent. though it was a bit dubious. maybe time will tell on that one.
what's my interest?
i like to try and see different sides to things, and to question elements of society that are accepted by the masses.
The general issue of how social constructs of a particular time and place are regarded as Immortal Laws in Stone is one of my favourite hobby horses.
Someone else, loki i think, was rejoicing that the fbi were posing as 13 year old girls and tracking down internet pedos. now i can see that in some ways that IS a good thing and girls need to be protected, but it's also very interesting to me that in other places and at other times fucking thirteen year old girls would be the most normal thing in the world.
are we saying all those different cultures are evil and wrong? and if so, logically speaking shouldn't we then launch wars against them to save the thirteen year old girls?
Submitted by WhatTheHell (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:28:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I'll give you $11,500 !!
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:28:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
If it were my daughter, I wouldn't do it.
If it were YOUR daughter, I would sell him the pictures and use the money for a college fund for her. That is if she wouldn't be emotionally scarred when she found out your friend Jamie (apullo?) was wanking to them.
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:21:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
actually I think it only relates to masturbation about your neighbours Ox and/or Donkey. I dont see any specific reference to ones neighbours daughter, so I suppose its okay.
Submitted by Soley_Trinity (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:17:54 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
does Jevhovah allowing any kind of wanking at all????? even if it's about your wife????
Only if he's there to witness the act.
Submitted by Huber_the_Nose (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:15:23 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
Since Im such a nice guy Ill only give a -1 for hitwhoring. Nevermind your philosophical intentions....
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:12:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't get it, what's the interest in it at all? Pete Townshend also had a pretty keen interest on "researching" the topic and now he's let the whole world down, because their memory of a great musician has been destroyed.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:11:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:53:40 (#)
Ranking: 0
or to take it a bit further, DOES IT MATTER WHAT A MAN THINKS ABOUT WHEN HE WANKS?
________
yes because Jehovah will punish you
----
does Jevhovah allowing any kind of wanking at all????? even if it's about your wife????
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 09:07:45 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
i admit shock is about the only thing that gets me attention around here, but if i was ONLY interested in shock then i would just do some kind of big mike diary of a madman, but with a kiddie sex killer theme.
i'm SURE i could come up with the most disgusting and shocking stuff ever seen on ubersite.
but that is of no real interest to me, though i suppose it would expose an hypocracy of sorts.
this post came to mind this evening because i read people on here chiming in with "cut his balls off, kill him, etc etc" about some person who had been caught with child porn. even though there was no indication on what exactly this 'child porn' comprised or the circumstances of the case. it got me thinking about what is child porn exactly , and what are the laws?
and then onto the deeper question of whether there are laws about what you think about while masturbating.
and for the sake of any people who can't read properly, let me say again: i think people who sell pictures of little children hving cocks rammed into them etc should probably be shot. certainly if someone did such cruel things to my four year old son i would kill them.
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:53:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
or to take it a bit further, DOES IT MATTER WHAT A MAN THINKS ABOUT WHEN HE WANKS?
________
yes because Jehovah will punish you
Submitted by Ed_0150 (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:51:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Personally, Id sell him the pics, then use the $10,000 to have him killed.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:50:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I think this is just a shock post. People on here are always competiting to write as offensively as possible, and this is ground most people won't touch with a ten foot pole, so you've got a monopoly on it.
Submitted by Feijuada (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:36:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Very good story.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:34:37 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
or a woman for that matter, pardon my sexism
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:30:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:20:20 (#)
Ranking: 0
I just saw on the news that young girls and women are falling prey to answering video calls on their mobile phones of perverts masturbating. This is a pretty sick most heated attempt, but it'll probably end up with a million hits.
---
actually fuckface, i have a long standing philosphophical and rational interest in questions like these.
via the medium of fiction, i was trying to convey some of the interesting parodoxes and contradictions that are always found with taboos.
and also to ask an essential and vital question: DOES IT MATTER WHAT A MAN CHOOSES TO WANK TO (assuming no people or animals etc have been harmed in creating any images he might use)
or to take it a bit further, DOES IT MATTER WHAT A MAN THINKS ABOUT WHEN HE WANKS?
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:29:47 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
A large portion of Uber is going to fall for this hook line and stinker.
Submitted by phuzzygish (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:28:44 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
the 1 was for the writing, not the actual situation by the way.
Submitted by phuzzygish (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:28:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Shandy, Problem 1: the moral quandry.
Problem 2: the fact that your friend wants to wank over pictures of three year olds, and is willing to drop huge wodges of cash to do it. Yes, problem 1 is a problem, but hell man, aren't you disturbed more about what kind of person your mate is?
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:25:19 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Kill him, and take the money
Submitted by knucklesnelson (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:24:48 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
sick fuck, what kind of sick shit is this? I would rather watch a jap eat some turd's out of another japs ass. But you are twisted.
Submitted by Soley_Trinity (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:24:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
You know, that Jamie fella asked for a go on my son too....
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2004-12-09 03:44:23 (#)
Ranking: 2
Wacky Warehouses are devils establishments.
Cute boy. Can I have a go of him?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by Soley_Trinity (user info) at 2004-12-09 04:24:01 (#)
Ranking: 0
Apollo, anything for you...
But hey, keep your rear end well covered. Knowing my boy, he'll try to tear you a new arsehole.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:23:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by xenon (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:19:19 (#)
Ranking: -2
Seriously...dude...do you WANT to encourage this guy or anyone else to molest your daughter?!
---
i thought i made it clear that the molesting aspect has been cancelled.
all he wants to do is wank over her pics. and i must say, i admire his honesty. i mean, he could have just looked thoough our family albums and asked for copies of whatever photos he wanted, without any mention of wanking or payment.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:20:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I just saw on the news that young girls and women are falling prey to answering video calls on their mobile phones of perverts masturbating. This is a pretty sick most heated attempt, but it'll probably end up with a million hits.
Submitted by hairycoo (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:20:10 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
dude...
Submitted by xenon (user info) at 2005-01-14 08:19:19 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Seriously...dude...do you WANT to encourage this guy or anyone else to molest your daughter?!


