Most heated (554 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -0.85 on 19 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by standardeviant<tooeasy2079.at.hotmail.com> (View user info) at 2005-02-14 10:00:11 EST
So, there I was. Bored at work when I had an epiphany. I was ubering and decided to laugh once again at exploiting peer-to-peer. Whilst looking, I noticed not only was it hit the most but it "appeared" to be ( not sure if it actually is) most heated of all time. Having over 600 reviews is quite impressive no matter what.
Then I decided to have some fun at the Governments expense. Meaning I work for the government and blatentely misuse their resources. I wanted to see exactly how many pages of print it would take for the post and all the reviews.
Well, let me tell you. It took 86 pages. That might not sound like a whole hell of a lot but I am going to break it down for you.
1. One piece of paper is 8.5" x 11"
2. 8.5" x 11" x 86 pages = 8041"
3. 8041" / 12" = 670.08 feet
4. The statue of Liberty is 151.1 feet tall
5. It would take 4.43 Statues of liberty to make one "Exploiting peer to peer" post and reviews worth of paper.
Needless to say... pretty fucking impressive.
It was so much paper. I tried to cover the entire library floor that I work. All the pages would not fit. I took a camwhore with it. Which I will try to post tomorrow.
User Reviews
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-02-16 06:07:34 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
You're a moron. Attempting to justify your quandary only furthers this inference.
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2005-02-16 05:56:39 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
http://www.ubersite.com/m/9564
2543 reviews... I want to review it, but my net browser crashes when i open the page. Fucking amazing, hey.
Submitted by funk_boy (user info) at 2005-02-16 05:47:24 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
you are the worst mathematician EVAR
Submitted by zakalwe (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:52:41 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Dipshit.
Submitted by Kre8rix (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:43:26 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Many thanks to Dustbrother for confirming my ramblings
Submitted by Kre8rix (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:42:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by standardeviant (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:27:37 (#)
Ranking: 0
I was talking with volume, squared. Inches in a line.
----
It's very possible that I'm wrong as I am very tired and hungover and at work.
Wouldn't volume, if measured, be cubed not squared as it is a measure of 3 dimensions not two?
None of your measurements, math or logic make any sense.
Although at this point, there isn't a lot that does make sense.
I can't think right now.
Submitted by Dustbrother (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:39:07 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by standardeviant (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:27:37 (#)
Ranking: 0
I was talking with volume, squared. Inches in a line.
THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. SQUARE INCH IS AREA, AND IF THEY WERE CUBED IT WOULD BE VOLUME BUT IT STILL WOULDN'T COME CLOSE TO THE HEIGHT OR VOLUME OR SURFACE AREA OF THE STATUE OF LIBERTY. If you meant a piece of paper one inch wide could go that high, what is the fucking point? You could make the text size 1000000000 and cut it 1/100th of an inch wide and tape it all together and glue one side to earth and one to the moon, it is so stupid and obscure I don't know why you brought this shit up. It doesn't mean anything. If you said word count or character count or size in bytes it might mean something, but comparing a webpage to the height of the statue of liberty? WTF
Submitted by xenon (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:35:34 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
You'll get Double +2s if you post that pic.
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:33:26 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
damn you americans and your math!
Submitted by standardeviant (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:27:37 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I was talking with volume, squared. Inches in a line.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:13:22 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
"I took a camwhore with it."
I hate to break this to you, but your grasp of the english language is slipping. You take a picture and post a camwhore.
Submitted by Dustbrother (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:12:04 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
http://www.ubersite.com/m/9564
print that
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:11:25 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Ahahahahahaha
86-11" pieces of paper = 670.08 feet ?
AHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Come back when you finish 8th grade.
Submitted by pen_name (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:10:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
haha, 78.83...woops!
Submitted by pen_name (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:09:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
dust is right....if you are measuring height, paper, on paper, on paper, sq. inches wouldn't come into play. 11" x 86 / 12 = 78.89'
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:08:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
That post is not the most heared of all time.
Try again.
Submitted by Dustbrother (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:07:25 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Let me guess, with math skills like that the government pays you to................. make number plates?
Submitted by Vomit (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:03:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I want your job.
Submitted by Dustbrother (user info) at 2005-02-14 10:02:40 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
you've fucked up in your calculation. Big time.