Child molesters (946 hits)
Category: PoliticsRating: -0.27 on 41 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by www.fuckyou.com (View user info) at 2005-03-29 00:45:58 EST
First of all before I get into the meat of this let me just say. If you are not a parent of a child then you should stop reading now, because your opinion does not fucking matter. Just like I have been told one million times that a mans opinion does not matter in the national abortion debate.
sexual - of or relating to sex, erotic, carnal, fleshy
deviant - divergent, different, strange
A sexual deviant is a person who gets aroused by unusual things, its not necessarily a negative term. A person who is into feet, or S&M, or even people who are into homosexual sex could be considered sexual deviants. None of the above listed sexual preferences are bad as long as they are done between consenting adults. In fact it would take a pretty unreasonable person to suggest that any gay person, or straight person could change their sexual preference. I challenge any uber user to try and change their sexual preference, I know I cant. I am attracted to women and that will never change.
A pedophile is nothing more than a sexual deviant, this is a person who is as attracted to children as you are attracted to your preference. The only problem is that raping children is very illegal and can land your ass in the slammer. In fact the illegality of it kind of ads to the excitement just like cheating on a spouse or having sex in public. Another driving force in pedophiles is the need to have power over someone weaker than them, most pedophiles are not good with their peers. Adding all the factors together makes for a very dangerous situation.
In the past children were molested by family members, the child molester could usually get away with it for a long period of time. In fact alot of molestation victims were victimized by a trusted family member or friend even preist. A victim would be confused, scared, and less willing to tell anyone about the molestation. This was always very safe for the pedophile, in fact was pretty safe up to 10-15 years ago.
Things have changed alot in American culture, in most cases a parent would be more likely to believe a child who claimed to be molested. This leads us to the modern day child molester, who operates just like any other rapist. Its much safer for a pedophile to snatch a child and rape it, and then hope to get away with the crime.
Now take a look at the prison system, its fucked. Americas prisons are filled with drug related criminals, the cost of incarceration cost this country billion annually. So a pedophile gets into one of these overflowing prisons, and is a model prisoner. Remember pedophiles are generally timid when around peers, and are not antisocial. So the pedophile becomes a trustee, talks to a couple head shrinks and is deemed fit to come up for parole. The pedophile does well before the parole board, and then is released back into society. However, the conditions of the parole are strict, and violating this parole means tougher punishment.
The paroled pedophile can not stop his sexual urges for children, and before long this pedophile is ready to rape again. Our pedophile finds another victim, rapes the child, climaxes and then reality sets in. The pedophiles judgement was clouded by his lust, but its amazing how cleary one can think after an orgasm. The pedophile does not want to go back to prison, and has a better chance of getting away with the crime if the victim can't talk. Now the pedophile has become a murderer. At the end of the process you have a trail of molested, and or dead children with one pedophile sitting in prison forever.
This is the process and it leads to only pain, suffering, and death. Most parents love their children more than anything in the world, and you cannot relate to this love unless you are a parent. This system is broken and needs fixing immediately. Basically there are only a couple of logical options here. I dont want to hear about humanity, or being cruel Fuck that. There is nothing on this shit hole planet more innocent than a child.
Pedophiles should be killed or be made physically unable to become sexually aroused. End of story
User Reviews
Submitted by Degreeless_Capibara (user info) at 2005-03-29 18:03:45 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by MandaPanda (user info) at 2005-03-29 17:48:38 (#)
Ranking: 2
Have a +2 to counter Ashlee's rating because she's a bitch.
---
Mrs. Pot gets acquainted with Mrs. Kettle.
Submitted by SwissCamel (user info) at 2005-03-29 17:58:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Hmmmmm
Submitted by MandaPanda (user info) at 2005-03-29 17:48:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Have a +2 to counter Ashlee's rating because she's a bitch.
Submitted by Zoidberg (user info) at 2005-03-29 17:01:05 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
another post of yours that sucks
imagine that
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 16:56:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2005-03-29 14:24:19 (#)
Ranking: -2
Keep sucking the disability off the government, fucko.
I'm proud of my law enforcement officers.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
I dont get disability, never said I did, just said I was disabled. When cops get hurt in the line of duty they get something akin to workmans comp called Injured on Duty. I unwillingly achieved that status after taking a fall down a flight of stairs while fighting with someone who didnt wish to go to jail. As a result of the fall I have several herniated disc in my spine, and have to get a spinal fusion. So fuck you asshole this doesnt cost you a penny.
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2005-03-29 14:24:19 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Keep sucking the disability off the government, fucko.
I'm proud of my law enforcement officers.
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2005-03-29 10:45:56 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
booo
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2005-03-29 10:41:27 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
i'm a paedophile.
Submitted by uneeknblnt (user info) at 2005-03-29 10:30:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Interesting post here. I read all the comments made by the others and not a one of them, including yourself, mentioned what the root of the problem "phediophilia" is.
I have been molested by my mothers ex boyfriend at the age of 7 and at 9 or 10, by a friend's younger brother (this is molestation because not only do they experience incest with one another but they obviously developed a pattern of sexual behaviors from another adult). As a result, I learned that bad touching and sexual commands were okay. That means by the time I was 11, I was telling other 6-7 year old children to play "house" with each other however, for some reason I was not involved as anything but a commander. I was caught and sent home from the neighbors house. I was asked why I did such a thing and that I should know better. The humiliation of my favorite aunt lecturing me was a lot worse than the pain and humiliation I got from being molested (at the time since I had naturally as a young girl disconnected myself from the molestation and "house" was easier to understand) so I think it pushed me into consciousness about my behavior. I learned EARLY that it was wrong thus I control it- like controling a temper, a horny moment when you want to do it with your lover, your eating habits, etc. I admit that I thought I was ruined and would never have children. I find myself overly conscious of how I hold babies and children even though Ive never personally have done anything to children. Therapy intervention really helps.
THE POINT is... the system of putting phediophiles in jail- OF COURSE -doesnt work! Lets start with children that have been molested, they need treatment to increase awareness in distinguishing their behavior to learn or unlearn what has been forced upon their belief system through the trauma. As for the phediophiles themselves who have done the deed need community support because like alcoholics, they cant just terminate alcohol (kids) from their lives. There is a consant temptation to drink and it takes work to fight the disease. I suppose it is the same with the urges. Honestly, I dont know because I am fortunate that dont know what its like to be them. I just know what its like to be that child doing things to understand what happened to her.
One posting said that you had no right to write about phediophilia because you dont have children. Nor do I. Perhaps you have a more personal relationship to the topic like I do. Write on- although some things were a little like swiss cheese but thats probably because you were passionate about the topic.
Submitted by QueenAshlee (user info) at 2005-03-29 09:45:01 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
First:
"If you are not a parent of a child then you should stop reading now, because your opinion does not fucking matter."
Have a -2 for that.
Second:
This post was not horribly written, but in a lot of it, you're pretty much just telling us stuff we already know. Try having an original thought, mmkay?
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-03-29 09:17:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I have another thought on this.
It's always seemed to me that a lot of things in the human brain are linked. For instance love and hate are more or less the same thing, albeit from different perspectives. Also it seems logical that it is not possible to have one without the other, in that in order to eliminate one then the ability to feel extreme emotions of any kind must be eliminated. As such it seems dubious in the extreem to target one area of sexual preference in such a wholesale manner.
For instance it is perfectly conceivable that the emotions and urges that cause people to commit these crimes are simply exaggerated versions of paternal and other protective instinct, for instance a evoloutionary 'trump card' to play against agressive males killing the young. Also it is conceivable that other unknowns exist and that the whole paedophilic urge is something felt by all adults, but that only some percieve it in a sexual way. This could be interpereted as bringing us back to the whole issue of 'treating the disease' which would be misleading, as surely such notions would do nothing more than prove that such drives are natural and that attempts to control such urges amongst a general populace could be, potentially at least, quite damaging to society as a whole.
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 08:37:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2005-03-29 08:01:06 (#)
Ranking: -2
To get this post back into the negative. Where it belongs.
If I wrote a post that proclaimed TheSpook's greatness, he would still -2 it. Because I was a fucking cop, and we all know that cops are the devil. I am sorry you got caught drinking and driving and molesting that chicken, but those things were bad mkay. Driving under the influence is dangerous, and molesting chickens is just wrong.
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 08:34:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Maybe people should just stop having kids and then there wouldn't be a problem, they are after all the root cause, and of course if there weren't any children there would be no one to grow up to be paedophiles! A double-barreled solution I say.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-03-29 08:05:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
something else to yet again throw into the mix, to be largely ignored:
it is REALITY that preschool teachers receive edicts from the authorities warning them not to hug children
it is REALITY that my generation of austrlian children were brought up with a very pervasive and powerful "Stranger Danger" (it even rhymes) propaganda campaign. ie, strangers are dangeours. what a friendly nice thing to drum into the kids!
as it happens, the REALITY now seems to be that the Experts have decided that most molestation doesn't occur from strangers in the park. it is done by fathers and family and close friends.
so, we really should pump out some FATHER DANGER ad campaigns to protect our kids, eh????
THAT SHOULD REALLY SOLVE THE PROBLEM!!!!
i'd like to be, under the sea, in an octupuses garden, in the shade.
YES I FUCKIN GWOULD
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2005-03-29 08:01:06 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
To get this post back into the negative. Where it belongs.
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 07:42:55 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Judoka (user info) at 2005-03-29 07:25:09 (#)
Ranking: 0
They have tried 'chemical castration', it doesn't work
If people in the pharmaceutical industry can make a pill that gives 80 year old men raging erections, they should be able to refine one that can suppress the male sex drive. Regardless, at the heart of the issue is the fact that our children should be better protected from these predators. My standpoint on the issue is that childrens rights and safety are more important than the civil rights of a predator, but there are many other opinions in this debate. All I can say is that with the problem getting more and more out of hand, you can expect to see some changes take place. The only thing we can hope for is that the elected officials who make these decisions, make good ones.
Submitted by Judoka (user info) at 2005-03-29 07:25:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
They have tried 'chemical castration', it doesn't work.
Submitted by Spice (user info) at 2005-03-29 07:00:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I dont want to go into the details of what happened to me but I was abused for years when I was a small little girl by someone that should have been protecting me. This still brings nightmares to me years later. To me ...there is NO EXCUSE for harming any child because you need some sort of sexual pleasure. The damage they cause continues forever.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:53:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
i don['t trust any studies or any accepted knowledge about anything, particularly poofs, sexality, etc
i read a page at random of a book called 'how to bring up boys'
the Great Expert pronounced, under a FAQ section "Call your son's penis a penis. Do not use silly names. It is a penis. Call it a penis"
my response: how fucking dare you claim such knowledge! i'm not reading your fucking book, you stupid stuck up cunt!
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:46:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:21:12 (#)
Ranking: 0
But then what if I think gay people are sick and they refuse to be helped, should we castrate them?
I think the way we look at paedophiles is wrong. I agree that people who habitually offend and show no remorse should be castrated, but why should those that want help be punished simply because we're doing a shitty job of helping them?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Well usually they wan't help after they have hurt someone,and if they want help then they wouldnt object to being chemically castrated.(which by the way is just taking medication that kills the sex drive) . By all means I agree with you 100% that if a pedophile wanted to be proactive and seek out help before they commit a crime the government should bend over backwards to help them. Its just that people usually do not operate in such a fashion. Most people need to hit rock bottom before they seek help in almost any destructive behavior.
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:45:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:37:32 (#)
Ranking: 2
There is one important thing to remember, in all cases attempts to 'rehabilitate' paedophiles sexual desires have failed. Physicians have only succeded in removing the desire altogether and cannot 'cure' paedophillia. Indeed the evidence suggests it is a valid sexual preference, like homo or hetrosexuality. Basically I'm saying that these are people, not plauge carriers. Furthermore there appears to have been an explosion in the amount of people convicted of possesion of child porn (thanks to the internet where the government is always watching you, well when it can be arsed anyway) which makes me wonder if this condition is not a lot more widespread than people think. Indeed I also wonder how many stories there are of men and women hooking up with 12-14 year olds and having very satisfiying two way relationships.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very well put, and scary...
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:42:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
"None of the above listed sexual preferences are bad"
well, fifty years ago it was widely accepted in the mainstream community, with laws to back it up, that poofs were BAD and had to be stopped.
Ask yourself, if you had lived in those times do you think you would have been a lone voice championing pooftah rights? or would you have been one of the masses condmening the poofs and urging stricter punishement?
plsease don't read anyting into this remark, just ask yourself the simple quetion
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:39:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
at different moments in my life (waking and sleeping) i have been attracted to:
-cats
-my mother
-my brother
-an old disfigured woman called maragaret
-women
-men
-children
-horses
-even MY WIFE
so shoot me
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:37:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
You say yourself it is unreasonable to ask a person to change their sexual preference, I understand that paedophiles are not having sex with 'consenting adults' and therefore what they are doing is wrong.
-I agree with you, but to say one can't help sexual preference, and to then say we should kill all paedophiles or cut off their ball's is surely oxymoronic. Maybe we should be seeking out paedophiles and giving them psycological and medical help, then the issue would no longer be underground and paedophiles may seek out help rather than preying on children in the shadows.
Paedophilia is obviously an evil thing, no doubt about that, but I wonder how many of them want to change but can't go anywhere for help because they are so spawned by society?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is one important thing to remember, in all cases attempts to 'rehabilitate' paedophiles sexual desires have failed. Physicians have only succeded in removing the desire altogether and cannot 'cure' paedophillia. Indeed the evidence suggests it is a valid sexual preference, like homo or hetrosexuality. Basically I'm saying that these are people, not plauge carriers. Furthermore there appears to have been an explosion in the amount of people convicted of possesion of child porn (thanks to the internet where the government is always watching you, well when it can be arsed anyway) which makes me wonder if this condition is not a lot more widespread than people think. Indeed I also wonder how many stories there are of men and women hooking up with 12-14 year olds and having very satisfiying two way relationships.
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 06:21:12 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
But then what if I think gay people are sick and they refuse to be helped, should we castrate them?
I think the way we look at paedophiles is wrong. I agree that people who habitually offend and show no remorse should be castrated, but why should those that want help be punished simply because we're doing a shitty job of helping them?
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:56:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:44:21 (#)
Ranking: 1
A sexual deviant is a person who gets aroused by unusual things, its not necessarily a negative term. A person who is into feet, or S&M, or even people who are into homosexual sex could be considered sexual deviants. None of the above listed sexual preferences are bad as long as they are done between consenting adults. In fact it would take a pretty unreasonable person to suggest that any gay person, or straight person could change their sexual preference.
--------------------------------------
You say yourself it is unreasonable to ask a person to change their sexual preference, I understand that paedophiles are not having sex with 'consenting adults' and therefore what they are doing is wrong.
-I agree with you, but to say one can't help sexual preference, and to then say we should kill all paedophiles or cut off their ball's is surely oxymoronic. Maybe we should be seeking out paedophiles and giving them psycological and medical help, then the issue would no longer be underground and paedophiles may seek out help rather than preying on children in the shadows.
Paedophilia is obviously an evil thing, no doubt about that, but I wonder how many of them want to change but can't go anywhere for help because they are so spawned by society?
+2 for making me think
-2 for some of the poorly thought through remarks
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Yes in a judicial system that worked fairly well it would be a big help if every pedophile could get good psychiatric help. Alot of pedophiles want help, and alot of them are remorseful after committing their crime and are more than willing to help the police. The problem is the judicial system often does try to help these people, but like nearly everything else done in a beurocracy its done poorly and half assed. It would be alot easier and more efficient to chemically castrate offenders, and execute the habitual offenders
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:44:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
A sexual deviant is a person who gets aroused by unusual things, its not necessarily a negative term. A person who is into feet, or S&M, or even people who are into homosexual sex could be considered sexual deviants. None of the above listed sexual preferences are bad as long as they are done between consenting adults. In fact it would take a pretty unreasonable person to suggest that any gay person, or straight person could change their sexual preference.
--------------------------------------
You say yourself it is unreasonable to ask a person to change their sexual preference, I understand that paedophiles are not having sex with 'consenting adults' and therefore what they are doing is wrong.
-I agree with you, but to say one can't help sexual preference, and to then say we should kill all paedophiles or cut off their ball's is surely oxymoronic. Maybe we should be seeking out paedophiles and giving them psycological and medical help, then the issue would no longer be underground and paedophiles may seek out help rather than preying on children in the shadows.
Paedophilia is obviously an evil thing, no doubt about that, but I wonder how many of them want to change but can't go anywhere for help because they are so spawned by society?
+2 for making me think
-2 for some of the poorly thought through remarks
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:42:17 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Chinaski (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:37:49 (#)
Ranking: -2
So fucking stupid, it's hard to pinpoint how many times you got dropped on your head
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Instead of making snide comments, prove the post wrong.
Submitted by Chinaski (user info) at 2005-03-29 05:37:49 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
So fucking stupid, it's hard to pinpoint how many times you got dropped on your head.
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 04:57:37 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by funk_boy (user info) at 2005-03-29 04:48:19 (#)
Ranking: -1
yer, my brothers kids mean nothing to me. if anything happened to them, i'd be fine.
?
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
I would hope that any child in your family means something to you. The point is your love for your brothers children is not nearly as strong as his love for them. Unless he is some kind of dead beat dad and doesn't have anything to do with his kids.
Submitted by funk_boy (user info) at 2005-03-29 04:48:19 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
yer, my brothers kids mean nothing to me. if anything happened to them, i'd be fine.
?
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 04:46:55 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2005-03-29 03:09:25 (#)
Ranking: -2
how old/stupid are you?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
k what part of this post is indicative of my lack of maturity and intelligence? Granted there are some errors in spelling and grammer, but I didn't have time to proofread. Besides I am not trying to write the great American fucking novel, just putting some facts out there about pedophiles. That being said, if any of the content in the post is innacurate, by all means correct it Dr. Death Metal Dude. If not feel free to go fuck yourself.
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2005-03-29 03:09:25 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
how old/stupid are you?
Submitted by HammetthalenvanSRV (user info) at 2005-03-29 02:55:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dragon (user info) at 2005-03-29 02:21:41 (#)
Ranking: -2
I didn't read what you have to say...but that part about men not getting a say in abortion pissed me off. Go die, pussy. If I want to molest this nation's children...it's my right...
I was going to insinuate that you are an idiot, but your response really does say it all
Submitted by Dragon (user info) at 2005-03-29 02:21:41 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I didn't read what you have to say...but that part about men not getting a say in abortion pissed me off. Go die, pussy. If I want to molest this nation's children...it's my right...
Submitted by Lunch_Pail (user info) at 2005-03-29 02:04:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
AMEN! A child molester should never be back on the street. A condition of his parole should be castration! Or he stays in prison.
Submitted by Wazza (user info) at 2005-03-29 02:02:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
CUT the balls out of them all,then they wont do it again.
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2005-03-29 01:38:10 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Insightful and captivating.
Submitted by Degreeless_Capibara (user info) at 2005-03-29 00:57:35 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I hate your name.
Submitted by Vermin (user info) at 2005-03-29 00:52:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
So this man goes to the doctor and says:
"Doc, I need to get some birth control pills for my 11 year old daughter"
and the doctor says:
"Jesus man! You daughter is sexually active at 11 years old?"
and that man says:
"No, she just kind of lies there like her mother."
Submitted by shitfuck (user info) at 2005-03-29 00:47:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I like your name.