What if PhD is just a code for "really good bullshitter"? (1568 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 1.6 on 66 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Lojope <lojope.at.juno.com> (View user info) at 2005-04-05 15:11:32 EDT
Do you ever get the feeling that all the "educated" people, all the "brilliant minds" are just making shit up? I mean, in order for something to be considered true, all that really has to happen is people have to believe it. The idea that the earth was flat was "true" for a long time, not because it actually was, but because it's what everyone believed. So basically, anyone can just say anything, and if enough people believe it, it is so.
In Linguistics today, we studied a Native American language called Tonkawa. We were trying to figure out the root words in different conjugations of verbs. Some of this migh be a little technical if you've never taken Linguistics, but bare with me, there is a point you will understand.
The conjugations for the verb "to cut" are as follows:
"He cuts it" - picnoh
"He cuts them"- wepcenoh
"He is cutting it" - picnanoh
"He is cutting them." - wepcenanoh
Ok, so from that data we can figure out that "oh" means "he" because each form is "HE+verb+subject" and "oh" appears in all forms.
We can also figure out that "we" means "them" and adding an "n" makes the verb progressive through similar methods.
Therefore that leaves us with 4 different possible roots, "picn" and "pcen" and "picna" and "pcena".
So therein lies the problem. Which is the actual root?
Well, educated minds in Linguistics have decided that the root is actually a super-hidden secrect choice of "picena" because it includes all possible options. Now, read this carefully, "picena" is not the infinitive form of "to cut" nor does this word actually appear in the language at all anywhere. There is no record of the word ever being said or written anywhere in the history of the language.
For all intents and purposes "picena" doesn't exist at all. They made it up. Someone decided it existed and someone else believed him and told someone else it existed and that person believed him and told someone else. Eventually enough people believed it that it became fact, and this word that never existed before has been created and accepted be people who have never spoken the language it "exists" in.
It's entirely made up.
I've also recently been made aware of the idea that once, long ago, nomad cave-drawing populations didn't know the connection between sex and procreation. Sure, they had sex anyway, but they pretty much thought that women could just somehow MAGICALLY spawn all on their own.
For this reason, women in these cultures were revered and mystical, almost god-like. And it wasn't until later, when men realized that they were involved and women were more like "vessels of their seed" that men decided they were better than women and woman were trash.
You know how they figured this out?
From some picture painted on a cave of a pregnant woman made to look glorified and magical.
Now, what I want to know, is how the hell do they know that that woman was supposed be "magical"? I could ask 10 people to draw a magic woman, and I'd get 10 different pictures. What's "magic" to one person might look more like "horribly constipated" to someone else.
But someone decided that the picture meant magical and someone else believed it and told someone else who believed it.... and so on and so forth, BAM! it's truth.
Jesus Christ, I am going to paint a picture on a rock of a man on a leash and bury it somewhere. Later I'll dig it up and tell people that people in the culture this mystic painting must have come from though of men as pets, not unlike modern day dogs.
Someone will believe it and tell someone else, and BAM! I'll be famous and revered as a brilliant mind of our age.
I can bullshit with the best of them.
Awesome.
User Reviews
Submitted by Oscar (user info) at 2005-04-09 21:42:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"We have proof the world is round"
the world bulges slightly out at the equator due to the spinning of the earth and the internal molten tidle motion on the crust.
don't believe me? well the "little g" the force of gravity on earth, is different at the north pole by something like 1% so you experience more gravity at the north pole(being closer to the center of the earth) than at the equator.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 11:23:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
purile hideous dogmatist?
you should at leat have tried soething like that, you lazy attention-seeking slut
Submitted by Jay_Bassman (user info) at 2005-04-09 11:17:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
This was a god-damn trippy awesome post... and that review down there fuckin' blew my mind, Teeph. I'm gonna print this post and that review out and stick them on the wall in my bedroom. I can't even begin to express the thoughts that are running through my head after reading these posts.... fucking awesome.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 11:02:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
here is a quote from the Great Sage: "You can have the truth, but ylu've got to chooose it"
ther eis some quote insane th emind put up that is relevant to
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 10:44:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
this post has generated some very interesting comments
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 10:42:11 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:29:58 (#)
Ranking: 2
Hahahhahahahaha
I did my Masters Thesis on "Environmental Racism". To cut it down from the volumes the premise was that poor neighborhoods are made up of blacks and other minorities, and we as a society always will build "less desirable, but completley necessary projects" in these opressed areas. A classic example in queens they built a Sewage tratment plant big enough to handle most of New York City's waste. They built it right in queens, no questions asked. When they go al pissed they built a park over top of it, but there is still the worlds largest waste treatment facility in their neigboorhood.
So I'm kinda guilty of this practice, I mean you could probably ask anybody on the street if we always stick it to the minorities because we can, and he'll know. I wrote a really long paper and had some fancy smanchy graphics on it and got a REALLY expensive piece of paper that tells me I'm better than everyone.
--
well put
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 10:27:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by canadia (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:23:20 (#)
Ranking: 2
I know quite a few Ph.D's... a lot of them are really smart, others are bullshit incarnate... and ass-kissers... and just plain assholes
---
this is good point, yu do come across the occasin one tht yu are impressed by
most of the cunts are doomed though to never actually use their incredibly specialeised knowldege and traingin, at least in the arts. they just end up shufflign papers and wrign stupid emials with the rest of us
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 10:22:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i must admit i quite like that theory of men finally figurring out that women needed our spoof.
but you make a very good point that it is just another of these received fuckign truths, and thinkgs may in reality have been quite different.
i will give you a link to a lunatic who write about primal ur wars between the sexes
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-04-09 10:04:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I think what I was trying to say in my rambling was that they would have more evidence than the picture of the pregnant shining lady before they would make a claim like that and have it accepted.
But maybe I was trying to say something else.
Submitted by mrwolf (user info) at 2005-04-09 09:54:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Hi-Fucken-Larious.
The picture at the end is awesome funny. I would download it as my wallpaper but my wallpaper is curently of me and I cream everytime I see myself.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 08:41:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
i think a more accurate description of academia would be a minority of people actualy 'making things up' i suppose osme of them must, but most of them are busy repeating and perpertuating the received truths you're talking about. my point is, most of them are actually very UNcreative. if they were more creative and curious in their thought, presumably there would actually be less of all this bullshit. but most of the cunts are just absurdly highly trained parrots.
Submitted by shandythedog (user info) at 2005-04-09 08:37:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Well, educated minds in Linguistics have decided that the root is actually a super-hidden secrect choice of "picena" because it includes all possible options.
WHAT THE FUCK????
IS THIS SECRET CODE?
the picicinaia stole the clotherful flower undewherare, super secretly, disguisned as mind blowing lunatics?
is that what it means???
anyway, i will press on
Submitted by Teephphah (user info) at 2005-04-06 16:12:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Crap.
It was all there last night. Must be one of those "conditional learning" things. Since I was drunk all throughout my formal education, I can only remember most of it when I'm drunk now.
Here are the basics of what I was going to try to cover:
Studying the "Philosophy of Science" I had to read books by Francis Bacon and Karl Popper and some other crazy old men. One of those books was the "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn.
What Kuhn did, and what really no one had done before him, was to look at what we consider to be "scientific knowledge" in an historical sense. Kuhn was the one who figured out HOW "science" progresses through time.
(A lot of my thoughts about this can be found here: http://www.ubersite.com/m/11431#135644)
What you are saying about some crazy theory being considered "true" if only one or two people esspouse the theory is perhaps more true when viewed of what we consider "historical" facts than with "scientific facts" but the pattern is very similar.
What it basically means is that we don't really KNOW what we think we know. It is ALL just a best guess. Maybe an educated best guess, but a best guess all the same.
For this reason, people arguing about the Truth of any given subject is almost laughably arrogant and probably futile.
Somehow, when I was drunk, I also thought I could see a way to tie that into the limitations of language.
The example from your post only served to bolster the impression I had from a similar story I once heard. The story was about Eskimos. I was told that the Native Peoples living up and around the Arctic Circle had something like 27 different words to describe what we think of as "snow."
One word meant "snow with an icy crust on top," another meant "snow that has drifted a particular way," etc.
What this made me realize is that, even when I am just sitting and thinking to myself, I think in WORDS. I don't just have unformed abstract concepts floating around up there . . . for me to call it a "thought" it has to be captured (or capturable) in words.
But what if I don't have a word to express a particular idea? I certainly don't have the words to think about 27 distinct types of snow.
As a result, that Eskimo, with his superior snow-vocabulary will be able to contemplate snow in ways that I never could (unless I learned his language, and even then I'd probably still be at a disadvantage).
So what words don't we have? What else is out there that we can't even THINK of because LANGUAGE can't make it concrete?
Sure, sometimes we create new words to describe new concepts when we have them, but those ideas are STILL going to have to have their BEGINNING in what we currently know - what we currently have the words to think about, what we have the words to ask questions about.
I don't know. This was all a little more obvious last night. I should have stuck it out and responded then.
Submitted by InkyFingers (user info) at 2005-04-06 12:11:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Why do you feel the need to send us men to the doghouse? Is it because we try to sniff your butt and lick your hoo hoo?
Submitted by lojope (user info) at 2005-04-06 08:07:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Aw, teeph, I love you! I can't wait to see what you come up with!
Submitted by lordofduct (user info) at 2005-04-06 03:21:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
That is why we have theory and fact. This conjucate form of the verb is admitedly made up. You were taught that it was made up and not the real word for it. So this isn't bullshit, they just need a placer for discussion purpose so someone entering the language could relate it to their own language.
We have proof the world is round or that it is colder in the north pole then at the equator. These things are fact. It is also a fact that the verb is made up and admitedly so.
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-04-06 02:13:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by lojope (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:47:27 (#)
Ranking: 0
Ok, I gotta tell you, I'm pretty sure this dude was being serious, but this reply cracked me THE FUCK up.
---------------
At least I made someone laugh! Yay!
...
Upon reading my review again, I don't know what I was smoking. I hadn't had much sleep.
Submitted by Teephphah (user info) at 2005-04-06 00:20:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Lojo - this is REALLY good (that is to say, "holy shit this is good."). If I don't remember to come back to this tomorrow, please remind me. There is sooooo much more here than what "Phd" means . . . it goes to the very credibility of all human "knowledge" (intermixed with the limitations language itself places upon said knowledge) and THAT is something that I find incredibly interesting.
Unfortunately though, I'm too inebriated to type out a disertation on the subject at present. Tomorrow I'll be on the clock and more able to get into this.
You rock.
Submitted by Mario (user info) at 2005-04-05 23:22:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Your drawing of a cock and balls has robotic arms, a smiley face, and a tattoo of a fetus on it. +2.
Submitted by Hairsphincter (user info) at 2005-04-05 22:59:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm the Doctor of Love.
Submitted by Bigmike (user info) at 2005-04-05 22:51:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I don't really do the whole linguistics thing but, this:
"Jesus Christ, I am going to paint a picture on a rock of a man on a leash and bury it somewhere. Later I'll dig it up and tell people that people in the culture this mystic painting must have come from though of men as pets, not unlike modern day dogs."
cracked me up.
Submitted by NSFW (user info) at 2005-04-05 22:43:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm pretty sure your mspaint shit is actually code for "damn, hope the pharmacist doesnt deny me morning after pills"
</troll>
Submitted by Or_ (user info) at 2005-04-05 22:22:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I haven't even read past the first sentence yet but I know a 2-worthy post when I see one. Great work.
Submitted by lojope (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:47:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:47:36 (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know why, but I found this pretty objectionable throughout. The whole concept of creating a root for those words was pretty arbitrary - more for the convenience of linguists than the experts saying the word ever actually existed. As for the cave paintings, I'm sure that they would know a lot more about it than you. The reason I am sure? Not because they have PhDs, but because in order to be qualified to make a judgement on that sort of thing, they would have to be experts in the field. If they weren't, the majority of academics wouldn't listen, the concept wouldn't receive endorsement etc. and we certainly wouldn't be considering it as truth. That's kind of your point, but as I said, for the best part, they would certainly be able to justify their findings better than you can satirise them. That came out wrong, but you know what I mean.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Ok, I gotta tell you, I'm pretty sure this dude was being serious, but this reply cracked me THE FUCK up.
Justify? Seriously? The only way to REALLY justify something like one of those cave drawings would be to ask the guy who painted it. That's the ONLY way anyone could know for sure what it was supposed to mean. And, well, I'm sure we can all agree that can't happen.
So the only JUSTIFICATION possible, would be to cite other "expert" opinions, which are speculations based on other "expert" opinions, which are speculations based on OTHER "expert" opinions..... I think you get the point.
Which is, of course, the point of this post.
Unless a person was there and knows first hand, everything is a guess. Educated guesses, maybe, but still just a guess at it's very core.
And a guess can just as easily be total crap as it can be true.
Submitted by Phallic_Cymbals (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:33:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"What's "magic" to one person might look more like "horribly constipated" to someone else."
You're tellin me, why do you think he was called 'magic' Johnson.
Submitted by DanielH (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:26:40 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
That was trippy. "It will be all one a hundred years hence." -Emerson. With carbon dating being askew, in a thousand years your stone drawing may prove to have been the inspiration for "Suspicious Minds" by Elvis.
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:12:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by corporate_drone0723 (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:20:10 (#)
Ranking: 2
Like George Costanza says - "It's not a lie if you believe it."
Submitted by Herpes (user info) at 2005-04-05 19:01:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm glad someone linked me to this. Well worth the read.
Submitted by DavyJones (user info) at 2005-04-05 18:34:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
That caption is great.
Submitted by Phinch (user info) at 2005-04-05 18:23:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
When you go through with your plan, its all about proof. The more sources the better. Once you dig up your "leashed man" rock, write a research paper. Then have someone write a paper citing yours as a reference. Next have someone write a paper based on the other two papers. Anything with two sources is unequivically true.
Submitted by Durae (user info) at 2005-04-05 18:17:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
why do people take everything so seriously.
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:48:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
*if you THOUGHT it was about
How did I omit a seven letter word?
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:47:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know why, but I found this pretty objectionable throughout. The whole concept of creating a root for those words was pretty arbitrary - more for the convenience of linguists than the experts saying the word ever actually existed. As for the cave paintings, I'm sure that they would know a lot more about it than you. The reason I am sure? Not because they have PhDs, but because in order to be qualified to make a judgement on that sort of thing, they would have to be experts in the field. If they weren't, the majority of academics wouldn't listen, the concept wouldn't receive endorsement etc. and we certainly wouldn't be considering it as truth. That's kind of your point, but as I said, for the best part, they would certainly be able to justify their findings better than you can satirise them. That came out wrong, but you know what I mean.
I believe in universal truth, in a Matrix kind of way (I'm tired, don't ask). That means, according to most people, that I am a naive fool. Does that make it truth?
Oh, probably.
But +1 for the title though, because this was potentially good if you it was about medical doctors. So "worth a read" indeed.
Submitted by Beer_bong (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:39:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm counting on it.
Submitted by screamfeeder (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:12:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I know I was just picking at straws. I think most of that shit is made up anyway. I just made up my own language. Look.
"See this looks just like American english but I am really calling you a cocksucker in a thousand possible ways! Dumbass!"
Wow there is so much mystery there I think I might faint!
Submitted by screamfeeder (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:08:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
It's cus I rule.
Submitted by lojope (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:08:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
And "picena" wasn't the only example of this anyway. Apparently all the verbs in this language come from words that never existed, I just used one example.
Submitted by lojope (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:06:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
You didn't actually ruin it, Shiloh, you just proved my point even more.
Submitted by screamfeeder (user info) at 2005-04-05 17:02:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Oh and just because I am a smart ass.
"Picena" is a word in the Yojuane and Mayeye tribes that lived near the Tonkawa in Texas. It is possible they shared similar dialect since the entire language of Tonkawan is a dead language. Only a handful of people ever got the chance to document the language and of them only on (Gatschet) was able to publish his findings.
So everything you are learning could be made up anyway.
Wow I totally ruined this....
Submitted by garcon_fou (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:52:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
No, I think PhD is code for "overqualfied and unemployed"
Submitted by mbstateside (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:35:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Nice rant and funny but I have to disagree.
The people who claim that "picena" is the litteral translation of to cut are putting it forward as a theory (at least they fucking well should be) the reason being it is unproveable. It is for this exact reason that Darwins theory of evolution and Einstein's theory of relitivity are just that THEORIES. Just because they are almost universily held to be true does not change the fact that from a scientific view it is still a theory. In order for somthing to beheld as a Law it has to be toatlly predictable and proveable just stating something that happens to fit the facts is not enough.
I do see your point though. For me it is very similer to the world of fine Art. Where you have a relitively few number of 'Experts' passing of what is only thier opinion of what is true (how ever well based) as fact.
Submitted by Bizdorph (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:24:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
What's "magic" to one person might look more like "horribly constipated" to someone else.
___________
(nods in agreeance)
(laughs at the above phrase)
(shits himself)
Submitted by swing39 (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:21:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
i'm writing my phd dissertation as we speak (local transient phenomena in bubbling fluidized beds) - imho practically any phd outside of the hard sciences or engineering is a huge stinking pile (being an engineer i am rather biased, though).
the higher educational system has evolved into a big business driven by the new educational paradigm, "if you want to succeed, you have to go to college." well news flash - not everyone needs to go to college. what marketable skills does a degree in COMPARATIVE LITERATURE or WOMYNS' STUDIES really provide you with in today's technically driven society? liberal education is nearly irrelevant and needs to be put out of its misery, and the white-haired kooks who teach linguistics and such need to be hauled off their ivory towers and beaten to death with freshman basic composition textbooks (goddamn "ways of reading"...).
Submitted by lethron (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:19:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
part of getting a PhD is not refining your ideas and researching to prove it... its all about making people accept and believe your bullshit
Submitted by JohnGalt (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:09:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"If that bitch gets knocked up again I hope God rains down lightning on her ass!"
Oh man...+2!
Submitted by strider (user info) at 2005-04-05 16:05:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
+1 for this comment:
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:56:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
dame me cabeza por favor (how do you make the accent?)
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:56:03 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
dame me cabeza por favor (how do you make the accent?)
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:53:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
screamfeeder es muy divertido con los comentarios que él hizo.
él pega a veces los fuegos artificiales en su culo como es el cuatro de julio.
Submitted by jgreening (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:49:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by haeftmece (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:18:32 (#)
Ranking: 1
I agree with you . . . for the most part.
BS - Bull shit
MS - More shit
PhD - Piled high and deep
Submitted by proofofpurchase (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:47:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
How do we know you are not one of them? Enough of your semantic antics. However, I see myself believing this.
Submitted by wardy (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:43:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
your plan wouldn't work. carbon dating, mofo. but on another note, plus 2 for having to take linguistics and being pissed off with the bullshit. i'm probably taking it next semester, and seeing as how i'm already taking rhetoric and hawthorne this semester, i'm getting sick of other people telling me what to think.
fuck rhetoric. oh, and fuck philosophy in general. i will think what i want.
Submitted by runninginplace (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:38:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
haha. i knew a lot of profs that were so full of it...
Submitted by screamfeeder (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:35:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Hay dos fiestas importantes: A finales de Enero se celebran las fiestas del patrón San Cecilio. Lo más típico de estas fiestas es el día de la leña: los hombres van con los mulos a por leña a los secanos y allí pasan el día; por la tarde, cuando regresan al pueblo, hacen una carrera con los mulos. Después, con esa leña se hace un chisco en la plaza donde acude todo el pueblo.
A finales de agosto son las fiestas de la patrona de Picena, la Virgen del Rosario. Son típicos de estas fiestas los Moros y Cristianos, que se representan en las eras del pueblo.
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:29:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Hahahhahahahaha
I did my Masters Thesis on "Environmental Racism". To cut it down from the volumes the premise was that poor neighborhoods are made up of blacks and other minorities, and we as a society always will build "less desirable, but completley necessary projects" in these opressed areas. A classic example in queens they built a Sewage tratment plant big enough to handle most of New York City's waste. They built it right in queens, no questions asked. When they go al pissed they built a park over top of it, but there is still the worlds largest waste treatment facility in their neigboorhood.
So I'm kinda guilty of this practice, I mean you could probably ask anybody on the street if we always stick it to the minorities because we can, and he'll know. I wrote a really long paper and had some fancy smanchy graphics on it and got a REALLY expensive piece of paper that tells me I'm better than everyone.
Submitted by Pentameter (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:29:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
The only thing any degree proves is that you can start something and finish something.
Other than that, they're useless.
Submitted by MrWillard (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:28:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Submitted by haeftmece (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:18:32 (#)
Ranking: 1
I agree with you . . . for the most part.
BS - Bull shit
MS - More shit
PhD - Piled high and deep
===================================================
I got my thunder stolen.
Submitted by AwesomeJohnson (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:28:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
I'll be done with mine in a year...ask me then.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:24:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
You know I always wondered where they got there proof about primitive man seeing women as magical because they got preagnant. I think those pics were by cro magnum-emo man to try and impress chicks because he couldn't hunt.
Submitted by nrduncan (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:23:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by canadia (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:23:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I know quite a few Ph.D's... a lot of them are really smart, others are bullshit incarnate... and ass-kissers... and just plain assholes
Submitted by corporate_drone0723 (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:20:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Like George Costanza says - "It's not a lie if you believe it."
Submitted by munkeypants (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:20:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
hahahaha
Submitted by heyzues (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:19:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
My brain...it hurts. Too much. So confused.
Submitted by haeftmece (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:18:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
I agree with you . . . for the most part.
BS - Bull shit
MS - More shit
PhD - Piled high and deep
Submitted by knucklesnelson (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:18:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
hee hee
Submitted by Durae (user info) at 2005-04-05 15:16:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Oh god, so funny...