Fuck Do I Hate The American Government (featuring Bush Camwhore [not that kind, sorry}) (1997 hits)
Category: PoliticsRating: -0.43 on 77 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by TheKindred (View user info) at 2005-09-29 16:02:16 EDT
Bit long, but bear with me.... It's your life.
As always, the good old U.S. of A government is busy snooping away and trying to finish up with their plans to know every possible aspect of your pathetic life so that they can exploit you a little more and exert that extra bit of control on your freedom. Zig Heil Mr.Bush !
source: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=6,947,978&OS=6,947,978&RS=6,947,978
Above is the actual patent application, I have summarized for your viewing enjoyment.
The National Security Agency was granted a patent on September 20, 2005 for new technology that allows them to identify the physical location of any web surfer. My checks at the patent office indeed confirmed US Patent 6,947,978. The NSA's stated uses for the technology included "effectiveness of advertising across geographic regions."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method for geolocating logical network addresses
Abstract
Method for geolocating logical network addresses on electronically switched dynamic communications networks, such as the Internet, using the time latency of communications to and from the logical network address to determine its location. Minimum round-trip communications latency is measured between numerous stations on the network and known network addressed equipment to form a network latency topology map. Minimum round-trip communications latency is also measured between the stations and the logical network address to be geolocated. The resulting set of minimum round-trip communications latencies is then correlated with the network latency topology map to determine the location of the network address to be geolocated.
The NSA is one of the most secretive US agencies, and while they might use such an advancement to study the "effectiveness of advertising across geographic regions," or "flagging a password that could be noted or disabled if not used from or near the appropriate location," one has to wonder what is really up their sleeves.
A little thought into this yields a whole new barrage of possible uses. But what little protection anonymous proxy servers and confidentiality agreements with ISP's and the like offered the average Internet user will now disappear into thin air. The bottom line is if they want to, they can find out exactly where you are. No search warrant requests, no inquiries to ISP's, no nothing. Big Brother has finally broken through the last tier of privacy.
And as if all this isn't bad enough, it's not time to stop looking over your shoulder quite yet:
source: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/46177.html
Computer scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, have uncovered a new security, strength, a lower TCO: find out about all the advantages of IBM Middleware on Linux. Threat: a simple audio recording of keyboard clicks could betray the text you just entered, from passwords to secret love notes.
They are calling it "acoustical spying." Researchers were able to take several 10-minute sound recordings of users typing at a keyboard, feed the audio into a computer, and use an algorithm to recover up to 96 percent of the characters entered.
"It's a form of acoustical spying that should raise red flags among computer security and privacy Latest News about privacy experts," said Doug Tygar, UC Berkeley professor of computer science and information management Discover a better way to manage the business of IT with IBM Tivoli solutions and principal investigator of the study. "If we were able to figure this out, it's likely that people with less honorable intentions can -- or have -- as well."
Distinct Sounds
What makes the technique feasible is that each keystroke makes a relatively distinct sound, however subtle, when hit. Typical users type about 300 characters per minute, leaving enough time for a computer to isolate the sounds of individual keystrokes and categorize the letters based upon the statistical characteristics of English text. For example, the letters "th" will occur together more frequently than "tj," and the word "yet" is far more common than "yrg."
"Using statistical learning theory, the computer can categorize the sounds of each key as it's struck and develop a good first guess with an accuracy of 60 percent for characters, and 20 percent for words," said Li Zhuang, a UC Berkeley Ph.D. student in computer science and lead author of the study. "We then use spelling and grammar checks to refine the results, which increased the character accuracy to 70 percent and the word accuracy to 50 percent. The text is somewhat readable at this point."
Eliminating Errors
But that's not all. The recording is then played back repeatedly in a feedback loop to "train" the computer to increase its accuracy until no significant improvement is seen. In the UC Berkeley experiments, three feedback cycles were often enough to obtain recovery rates of 88 percent for words and 96 percent for characters.
Once the system is trained, recovering the text became more straightforward, even if the text was a password and not an English word. After just 20 attempts, the researchers were able to retrieve 90 percent of five-character passwords, 77 percent of eight-character passwords and 69 percent of 10-character passwords.
There are limitations to the technique, however. The researchers pointed out that they did not use the Shift, Control, Backspace or Caps Lock keys for their experiments, but describe approaches for training a program to account for those keystrokes as well. The ability to account for use of a computer mouse will be more challenging, the researchers said.
Nevertheless, the findings highlight a security hole that could be exploited and should be investigated, the researchers said. "The message from this study is that there is no easy escape from this acoustic snooping," said Tygar. "The type of keyboard you use doesn't matter, your typing proficiency doesn't matter and the background noise can be overcome."
God Bless the USA.
User Reviews
Submitted by bandphotographer (user info) at 2005-11-11 03:12:17 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Didn't read thet text, but the pic montage was killer...
+2 Fairy
Submitted by hurt911gen (user info) at 2005-09-30 21:57:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
-2 because its another anti-Bush thing. your title says differently.
+2 cause its funny
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-30 19:29:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I do what I can Vicious
After all, I am only one man
<with a penis the size of two men>
Submitted by Viciousriffs (user info) at 2005-09-30 18:54:24 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Painfully true. I"ve been waiting for a visual comparison of Bush and Hitler for quite some time now. Thank you, my political rage is temporarily sated.
Submitted by cleanfornow (user info) at 2005-09-30 15:00:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
'Dorph,
What's a treehouse? Is that anything like a tree house. Fucking twat.
Submitted by sideshow (user info) at 2005-09-30 13:12:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
That is fucked up. I have never liked Bush.
Submitted by Bizdorph (user info) at 2005-09-30 11:33:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
What's a victom? Is that anything like a victim? Fucking moron.
Submitted by cleanfornow (user info) at 2005-09-30 11:26:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I hate the government too. Fucking tax, tax, more taxes. Give it to the "Poor" lazy, fat, slob, baby popping-outing, cigerette smoking, lottery playing, SUV driving, "Minority". Then people have the nerve to ask for donations to help the Katrina victoms. Fuck! $200,000,000,000 isn't enough? Want my last $10 too? Ever watch a Ford Escalade drive-up to the medicare office, drop off a huge fat overfed pig for treatment? Meanwhile my wife is working her ass off for $8 an hour and doesn't qualify for the benefit.
I think I will post on this subject, I could rant forever.
-2 because Hitler is not funny. -2 because comparing Bush to Hitler is really stupid, and annoying. -2 because comparing imprisoning enemy fighters to gassing Jews is just plain wrong.
Submitted by Thanatos (user info) at 2005-09-30 10:17:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
And another -2
I read the reviews and you posted after damned near every one. Shit or get off the pot. If your post didn't say what you wanted it to, learn how to write.
Submitted by Thanatos (user info) at 2005-09-30 10:10:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Wow, I wasn't aware that Bush = Hitler, or that Bush = the cause of everything.
How can you call Bush a moron, tool, idiot, etc. when he apparently not only invented hundreds of new ways to spy on people, but he also designed, built, and applied them, then personally put handcuffs on you for jacking off to kiddie porn.
I don't remember anyone accusing Clinton of being to blame for some guy applying for a patent.
Submitted by MrSparkle847 (user info) at 2005-09-30 08:33:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Very repetitive photo montage, but I won't -2 it, because I recall having to make a hawk/dove political poster for my history class, so I photoshopped Osama's head onto Uncle Sam's body pointing at you saying "I want YOU to protest." People were quite offended by it. The teacher said I had done a good job, because the poster had done what it was supposed to - make a stir.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-09-30 08:19:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
GODDAMNIT.
we can do without the comparisons to hated political figure of the past. Bush will eventually find his place in history.
as far as the invasion of privacy addressed in this artice?
1. privacy is not a right. Security in your affects, papers, self, etc. are, but privacy is not.
2. doesn't make it right. Privacy should be a right.
3. How much power do you think Bush actually has? checks and balances people (meaning that you cannot unilaterally blame one person for all the world's troubles.
4. fuck off with the propoganda.
Submitted by senor_tusky (user info) at 2005-09-30 08:04:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
My point was not to raise a debate about what a republic is versus a democracy (I'm aware of the difference) but to assert that the US may have problems, but is comparatively better than everything else out there.
Also, as far as the Hitler/Bush thing, if you're going to make such comparisons, I'd recommend throwing Stalin or Mao in there for the privacy (or lack of) in their respective regimes, given the thrust of your post. Not that I agree with you, but still... in the interests of accuracy.
PS. I'm not an assclown. Have a nice day.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-30 07:15:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:00:43 (#)
Ranking: 0
Rad,
1. Extended your borders ? Sorry as fuck man, just because you don't stick a flag in the ground and 'claim' the land for the USA doesn't mean you haven't taken it over or control it. Get a fucking clue. Like I said in a previous review, your government has seen what Hitler did and just taken a more subtle approach.
2. Hard to say. The government sponsored media whore hasn't shown you any of it, so it must not exist. After all, if it's not on TV - it's not official. Let's see now, speaking of the holocaust, which country was it that went out of their way to import all those 'sick fucking doctors and scientists' that operated under the Third Reich ? Oh right it's your fucking pristine nation that offered them all jobs in the top secret facilities. But I bet you were just looking out for their best interests right ? as the world's protectors and the great humanitarians ?
--------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't realize we were setting up leaders in other countries. If that were the case why would we have allowed so many pro-iranian representative to be elected in Iraq?
As far as media not showing it, please show me one news source that shows the US attempting genocide. Please find one, Al jazeera won't even make claims like that.
Sick fucking doctors that operated in the third reich? Most of the ones we took were jewish and left because they knew what was coming. The ones we took after the war were just regular scientists. We offered no asylum to people who worked in death camps or expiremented on prisoners there. Would have rathered they went to work for Russia?
I am still waiting for someone to tell me how there rights are being taken away by bush. If kerry would have been elected your rights would be exactly the same.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-30 07:06:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 21:57:08 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja:
the point is that the United States is a republic, not a democracy although it is constantly touted as the latter.
While they are very similar, there is a difference. Democracy is truly "by the people and for the people" whereas a republic is the people electing someone to take care of the problems for them.
-------------------------------------------------------
Democracy
2) : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
See that word directly or indirectly in there? A democracy that does not exert its power indirectly through elected officials is impossible.
Submitted by sl4tt3ry (user info) at 2005-09-30 02:13:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I did a paper on this in college, this is some scary shit. I don't like Bush, but this program shows that our rights and liberties have been in danger for far longer then he's been in office
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~pspoole/echelon.html
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-30 01:49:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Rad, I would honestly enjoy hearing your take on it. So far you're the only one to come up with halfway decent arguments. Certainly better than the "youre a pinky commie bastard hyuk hyuk. -2die 'cause my daddy slept wit his dadgum sister, and now sometimes I don't think right" mentality that permeates ubersite as of late. If you disagree, that's cool but at least voice your opinion - it takes billions of different ideas and perspectives to make the world go around everyday.
Hell, maybe you'll even convince me that I'm wrong. Maybe.
Mayb......aawww fuck it. yer a big dummie. hyuk hyuk.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-09-30 01:10:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
no, it isn't the only point I take issue with. I just feel like it would be a waste of time attempting to present my points in this particular thread.
Submitted by mush (user info) at 2005-09-30 00:39:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The only reason I'm gonna disagree is their character. Hitler was a genius and a great orator. Bush isn't. When Hitler ran the show, he controlled every aspect of his reich. With one person in control it's easier to conceive and execute a master plan (Final Solution... whatever).
Not only is Bush not the brightest president to ever grace the Oval Office, but the way shit is run nowadays most of stuff you think of as a conspiracy is really just coincidence. There are too many idiots and too much bureaucracy. The kind of complicated "lets take over the world" stuff just doesnt happen at that level and manage to be widespread.
Are there asshats out there fucking around? Sure. The CIA/Contra thing was a fucking embarassment, but it was only about a dozens asshats who knew they were being asshats... it wasnt the whole government. The soldiers underneathe them were just taking orders.
I'm tired. G'night
Submitted by Call911 (user info) at 2005-09-30 00:25:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I hate all politicians.
Why do many Americans find it so hard to believe that Bush maybe very similar to Hitler?
Hitler if he did not kill the jewish people would have been so similar to Bush in political agenda that it is stupid.
Those who consider looking at the similarities are just keeping an open mind and realising that although there are a differences... there are many similarities.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-30 00:11:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Rad,
yeah, my apologies to the fine young men and women of guatenamo.
But out of the whole reply, this is the only point you make an issue out of ?
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:56:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Look at the soldiers at Guatenamo Bay.
-----------------------
you mean the ones doing a stand up job protecting the human rights of the prisoners there?
or were you speaking of abu gahrib?
Submitted by Spooner (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:33:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
This was very stupid.
Bush is a dick, but he's not a nazi.
Submitted by forensicgirl3 (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:16:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Look, I could give a shit if you hate our government or Bush or not. Please don't equte Bush with Hitler. It's offensive, especially to Jews (and no, I'm not Jewish).
Submitted by Auf-Der-Maur (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:14:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Haha I dont like Bush, but I hardly see what sneeking rocket scientists out of Germany so the RUSSIANS (You're commie friends that would have rolled right over europe if it wasnt for america) dont get them has to do with Genocide. And I am unaware of any nazi doctors (atleast from concentration camps or any that helped in killings) being rescued, I think it was only the people of value.
What do you, Bush, and Hitler all have in common? YOU ARE ALL COMPLETE RETARDS
I bet you like emo too
Submitted by TweakinIan (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:11:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
YAY!
Your writing isnt very good,
but I agree with you so much...
+2!
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:07:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
We're being told that it's either (a) inappropriate or (b) untrue to refer to Bush's illegitimate junta as Nazi, neo-Nazi or neofascist. Because, you know, you're not necessarily a Nazi just because you seize power like one, take advantage of a national Reichstag Fire-like tragedy like one, build concentration and death camps like one, start unprovoked wars like one, Red-bait your liberal opponents like one or create a national security apparatus that behaves like something a Nazi would create and even has a Nazi-sounding name.
All of those people who see a little Adolf in the not-so-bright eyes of America's homeland-grown despot are just imagining things.
Of course, there are differences. Hitler, for example, was legally elected. And he had a plan--not one that I like, but a plan--for the period after the war.
I'll be happy to stop comparing Bush to Hitler when he stops acting like him.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 23:00:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Auf-Der-Maur (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:40:42 (#)
Ranking: -2
Zig Heil? You listen to Green Day? Fuckin retard, that right there is -2. Cant even spell it right, I bet you dont even know what it means
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing to do with Green Day fuckwad, I don't even get the reference and you're the only one to bring it up, so lick my chode fan boy.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:42:35 (#)
Ranking: -2
could you show me where we have
1. extended our borders
2. committed mass genocide; including gas chambers, firing squads, and human experiments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rad,
1. Extended your borders ? Sorry as fuck man, just because you don't stick a flag in the ground and 'claim' the land for the USA doesn't mean you haven't taken it over or control it. Get a fucking clue. Like I said in a previous review, your government has seen what Hitler did and just taken a more subtle approach.
2. Hard to say. The government sponsored media whore hasn't shown you any of it, so it must not exist. After all, if it's not on TV - it's not official. Let's see now, speaking of the holocaust, which country was it that went out of their way to import all those 'sick fucking doctors and scientists' that operated under the Third Reich ? Oh right it's your fucking pristine nation that offered them all jobs in the top secret facilities. But I bet you were just looking out for their best interests right ? as the world's protectors and the great humanitarians ?
Look at the soldiers at Guatenamo Bay. If you think that's an isolated incident, you've got bigger issues then I thought. They're just the ones dumb enough to get caught. What do you think goes on behind the scenes where the public and the media are denied access?
Submitted by d_prime (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:47:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Hahahaha.
Yes, I have American Idiot. The linear notes spell Sieg Heil with a Z. Hilarious.
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:42:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
could you show me where we have
1. extended our borders
2. committed mass genocide; including gas chambers, firing squads, and human experiments
Submitted by Auf-Der-Maur (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:42:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I think Hermann goerring is a more appropriate comparison to Bush
Submitted by Auf-Der-Maur (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:40:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Zig Heil? You listen to Green Day? Fuckin retard, that right there is -2. Cant even spell it right, I bet you dont even know what it means
Submitted by d_prime (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:39:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
A republic is any nation without a king.
Unless you're all accusing Bush of getting his position because of his father, shut the fuck up.
Submitted by TkdMoose (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:32:29 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Kindred, you don't need to waste your time on these brainwashed, CNN-watching, lazyass people at all. You know whats going on, I know whats going on, these other guys are just the unknowing oil that lubricates the gears that are in motion now. I don't give a shit how long you have been on Ubersite or what the fuck your post count, or your rating count is, if you think that the US hasn't been doing classified projects to "sniff" for information or that the whole illegal war was required to fight "terror" than you are just a dumb Americal yahoo who is listening to what they want to hear, not what is plainly set in front of you. Jesus Christ, I can't believe America is buying into this whole scheme, have they gotten so lazy to want the government to do everything and not question what is being done???
Submitted by d_prime (user info) at 2005-09-29 22:23:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
*sigh*
This is so digusting... and offensive...
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 21:57:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja:
the point is that the United States is a republic, not a democracy although it is constantly touted as the latter.
While they are very similar, there is a difference. Democracy is truly "by the people and for the people" whereas a republic is the people electing someone to take care of the problems for them.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-29 21:02:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by johnhutch (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:45:23 (#)
Ranking: 2
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
You fuckers will be the ruin of us all. You'll sit on your asses and salute the people taking our freedoms, liberties, privacy until your own is violated. But by that time you'll have lost your right to do anything about it.
---------------------------------------------
What freedoms or liberties have you lost under the Bush administration?
What freedoms have you lost because of the technology?
Would you prefer the govt to not pursue any new technology because it could be used against you?
Guess what, people all over the world are going to be trying to look for technology like this, not just the US, fuck not just other governments.
If they were really trying to fuck you over with this why did they even make it public with a patent?
Please re-read the definition for democracy and republic. They are not mutually exclusive.
Republic
1) : a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
Democracy
2) : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 21:01:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
fucking Echelon, that's some scary shit.
We can't listen to our people but Japan can, and Japan can't listen to thier people but France can, and France can't listen to their people but the US can, and the US can't listen to their people but Canada can. Ahh fuck it guys. Let's just all share what we got. Fucking spooky.
Unless YourNameIsTim. Then it's all quite flattering that the government would want to track his every movement.
Submitted by HadToBeDone (user info) at 2005-09-29 20:45:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:14:07 (#)
Ranking: -2
So it's wrong for the government to try to know this tech sooner and better than some fucking scam artists to be prepared for asswipes who come crying to the big evil Bush machine for help when their credit card info is stolen?
--------
Jesus Christ, Jack. You should know better. The NSA has nothing to do with identity theft. They have no charter to operate on US soil.
You wanna know what this is? Look up Echelon. Now go one step farther. This is the digital equivalent of a wiretap, without the need for a judge's order.
Submitted by johnhutch (user info) at 2005-09-29 20:31:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Go look up democracy. Wikipedia it or something. Read about how it works.
Now turn on the news.
You see the difference? We're a republic. And a terribly corrupt one at that.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 20:26:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by senor_tusky (user info) at 2005-09-29 19:29:31 (#)
Ranking: -2
"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried." Ditto for the US of A.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a shame that the USA is a republic, not a democratic nation.
assclown
Republic
1 a (1) : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government b (1) : a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government c : a usually specified republican government of a political unit <the French Fourth Republic>
http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=republic
Democracy
1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=democracy
Submitted by senor_tusky (user info) at 2005-09-29 19:29:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried." Ditto for the US of A.
Submitted by Jesus_Loves_TwEE (user info) at 2005-09-29 18:33:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Im sure Big Government would never take advantage of this new technology, besides police states are super sucsexey!
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:49:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:34:46 (#)
Ranking: -2
Hyperbole, stretched comparisons, a complete lack of any knowledge of history...
In a word, BORING.
-2 die.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn't that the Bush Administration's campaign slogan ?
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:34:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Hyperbole, stretched comparisons, a complete lack of any knowledge of history...
In a word, BORING.
-2 die.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:25:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by ghey (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:23:02 (#)
Ranking: -2
I've just traced your IP address to a whorehouse in Tijuana. I'm telling your mother.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't help it, it's the only way I get to see your mom now. Tell that bitch to move back north of the border so I don't have to keep using my air miles for a decent reach around.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:23:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by inkursion (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:17:38 (#)
Ranking: -2
You're an idiot.
Hitler was a genius politician, and a great person at doing the job he set out to do.
Bush is just a tool to his fathers' oil corporations.
Not even on the same wavelength...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I fully agree with you. I don't condone what Hitler did by any means, but he did pull off what few would be able to. He was a political genius and knew how to win a crowd over (or a country for that matter). Adolph had a very specific agenda, Bush has an agenda specifically laid out for him.
I don't compare the two in an even match up, more the sentiment of 'like evils'. Either way, one was a country run by a criminal and the other is run by a consortium of criminals. Hitler just wasn't as subtle. The Bush Bunch learned from his mistakes.
The Bush Bunch. 10 bucks says it's the next reality show on Fox.
Submitted by ghey (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:23:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I've just traced your IP address to a whorehouse in Tijuana. I'm telling your mother.
Submitted by inkursion (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:17:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You're an idiot.
Hitler was a genius politician, and a great person at doing the job he set out to do.
Bush is just a tool to his fathers' oil corporations.
Not even on the same wavelength...
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:12:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
stabkill at his best
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/200/1549/320/retard.jpg
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 17:11:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:57:09 (#)
Ranking: -2
Johnhutch, where is your bell and wooden sign strapped over your body?
Ding-Ding...THE END IS NEAR...DING-DING.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the spirit, short-bus. Anyone who can think independantly is a crazy conspiracy nut.
Now did you come up with that all by your self or did your mommy help you ?
Or better yet is that what your administration has taught you to say so that you don't question any alterior, slightly (or blatantly) shady ideals that they force on you ?
Try a intelligent response next time, instead of the same regurgitated canned response that is used by assclowns such as yourself anytime the American Government is questioned.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:57:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Johnhutch, where is your bell and wooden sign strapped over your body?
Ding-Ding...THE END IS NEAR...DING-DING.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:52:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
johnhutch:
Thank you, that pretty much sums up the spirit of the post.
Stabkill:
The post isn't about comparing Hitler to Bush. Yeah yeah yeah, the pictures. The point is that not only are the "American Ideals" being subverted and preverted beyond recognition, it is being done with full support by the government sponsored media brainwashed American public. To top it off, it's not enough to subvert your own culture, but then to force fundamentally flawed ideas on the rest of the world that are built on (for lack of a better word) conspiracy, is fucked.
You don't like the Hitler comparison ?
How about Rome ?
Submitted by Mrs.Love (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:51:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
You're a sad little douchebag.
Submitted by johnhutch (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:45:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
You fuckers will be the ruin of us all. You'll sit on your asses and salute the people taking our freedoms, liberties, privacy until your own is violated. But by that time you'll have lost your right to do anything about it.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:45:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I do love how all the foreign fuckers and 18 year old wet-behind-the-ears types equate Bush to Hitler as if they lived in occupied Poland in 1943. Then you got George Soros feeding these fuckers lines to incite them even more... Now THAT is why you should love the USA.
I wonder in 2008 when the next election happens how our fascist government will collapse and quickly be replaced by a peaceful, wonderful government. Of course, if a republican gets elected again (and probably will), this arguement is mute because we are only a nazi-style regime with republicans in charge.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:44:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
forthewin:
The pictures were just for fun, I was going to just do a SPT with them, but then decided you include the post.
I realize that Bush is not the major problem. It takes a lot of people to run a country (especially with as much clout as the US), and Bush is just the figurehead. Although the post isn't about Bush specifically, being the figurehead makes him the man to pin the blame on.
That being said, no one can deny that Bush himself has spearheaded some absolutely ridiculous initiatives himself (Patriot Act anyone?). I would get into the whole "electing a puppet" spiel but personally, I think it's been overdone and worn out.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:41:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Berkeley has been known to provide the government with the tools to spy on the population of the USA and the world. They are big friends of GW Bush, you know.
Submitted by forthewin (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:37:41 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
The problem with this is that it's talking about shit that's going to be researched and used no matter who is president. This post is shitty because you're writing about stuff like it's a big deal when it's not all that surprising.
If you write about the tiny chips that are able to be implanted in your body and scary shit like that without talking about our idiot president, I think that'd be more interesting. All it is, is technology getting better, and people using it in a less than reputable manner. That's how it works, there's no way around it.
Now, if you're going to write an anti-Bush post, at least write about all the stupid shit he's responsible for. Don't write about increases in technological abilities, and then post a bunch of pictures showing how evil Bush is.
There is far too much to blame on Bush, for you to have to go and whine about this.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:29:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by MyNameIsTim (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:26:02 (#)
Ranking: -2
re the nsa thing.
how much do you think they already know?
do i care if the nsa knows i jerk off to ffm porn and use my laptop on the bus? sure don't.
and i can't see why anyone would.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is almost single handedly the most retarded statment I've ever seen written.
That's just the right attitude that keeps fucking the rest of the world. You must be running for office soon, yes ?
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:26:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:15:42 (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:11:25 (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm not saying noone else would research it, but noone else has the resources to implement it on a full scale level. The US government is one of the most subtly corrupt in the world and wouldn't hesitate to use the technology in "less than reputable" circumstances.
-------------------------------
If they were going to use it like you htink why did they patent it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When the wright brothers patented their aircraft design, did they think that nuclear weapons would be dropped from it ?
When Edison patented the telephone, did he anticipate a massive intraweb through which banks and government databases could be infiltrated ? or for pedophiles like yourself to trade kiddie-porn ?
The point is, you can patent the idea without revealing the motive behind it.
Submitted by MyNameIsTim (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:26:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
re the nsa thing.
how much do you think they already know?
do i care if the nsa knows i jerk off to ffm porn and use my laptop on the bus? sure don't.
and i can't see why anyone would.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:22:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:14:07 (#)
Ranking: -2
So it's wrong for the government to try to know this tech sooner and better than some fucking scam artists to be prepared for asswipes who come crying to the big evil Bush machine for help when their credit card info is stolen?
As JonnyX said, you really are a German douchebag.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack,
go back to reading your Tom Clancy novels where the American Mercenaries 'liberate the free world' and are the real heros by saving the world in the dark while we sleep. Fuck you. I hate to break this to you but it's your government that has royally fucked your entire societal latter for the last 200 years. You keep believing that the USA can do no wrong.
To clarify, I'm not talking about "USA the corporation", or "USA land of the free/brave". I'm talking about the USA that commits secret attrocities against the world and their own people in secret. A nice example would be the CIA flooding the streets with illicit drugs to fund even more illicit activities. Or is that just more tinfoil-hat talking?
I'd rather wear the tin-foil hat then your collective asshat, fucking clown.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:15:42 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:11:25 (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm not saying noone else would research it, but noone else has the resources to implement it on a full scale level. The US government is one of the most subtly corrupt in the world and wouldn't hesitate to use the technology in "less than reputable" circumstances.
-------------------------------
If they were going to use it like you htink why did they patent it?
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:15:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Why is it that anytime you say anything even remotely skeptical about the US government, all these fucking armchair generals step out to tell you how fucked you are. They don't even fucking deny it anymore - they just attack whoever is challenging their "perfect" little status quo.
Yes, that's right little lemming, we're just going for a walk. What? A cliff? No no no, don't worry about that, just keep looking over here. No no don't look over there. Look at me, there ya go. <suckers>
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:14:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
So it's wrong for the government to try to know this tech sooner and better than some fucking scam artists to be prepared for asswipes who come crying to the big evil Bush machine for help when their credit card info is stolen?
As JonnyX said, you really are a German douchebag.
Submitted by firefly (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:13:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
No Comment
Submitted by FATMANTPK (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:13:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Since when does the government need a patent for spy stuff?
Submitted by userpete86 (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:12:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Scary. I want a tin foil hat too!
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:11:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm not saying noone else would research it, but noone else has the resources to implement it on a full scale level. The US government is one of the most subtly corrupt in the world and wouldn't hesitate to use the technology in "less than reputable" circumstances.
Submitted by Sassmasterr (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:11:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:08:48 (#)
Ranking: -2
Yep if Kerry had been elected not only would the US have never researched this stuff, but no other Govts in the world would be working on it either.
Die.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:09:27 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
As soon as you're done with it JonnyX, I would love to have it back.
It also helps keep the rain off my head.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:08:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Yep if Kerry had been elected not only would the US have never researched this stuff, but no other Govts in the world would be working on it either.
Die.
Submitted by leilani (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:08:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
WTF I'M NOT READING ALL THAT although some of it is probably true!!!!111!!!!
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:07:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
better put your tinfoil hat back on, deutschbag.
Submitted by mikethescottish (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:05:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Not even gonna rise to it, buddy.
Submitted by Kindred (user info) at 2005-09-29 16:03:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Lenny: Yeah, he got injured on the job and they sent him home with
pay. Pfft. It's like a lottery that rewards stupidity.
Homer: Stupidity, eh?
King-Size Homer