CIA's publicly released confirmed list of WMD findings in Iraq: (656 hits)
Category: Politics -> IraqRating: -0.66 on 19 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by The Last Prophet (View user info) at 2005-11-12 16:10:06 EST
User Reviews
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2005-11-12 19:34:34 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-12 19:07:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
A person with a clearance and a "need to know" who imbibes and gets
drunk is a danger to himself, his family, and the country.
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 19:02:44 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:07:52 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:01:30 (#)
Ranking: -2
Here's links bitch...
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4661
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/2/220331.shtml
Don't like those sources? How about the NY Times?
Excerpt:
In its May 22, 2004 edition, the New York Times confirmed a myriad of reports on Saddam's nuclear fuel stockpile - and revealed a chilling detail unknown to weapons inspectors before the war: that Saddam had begun to partially enrich his uranium stash.
The Times noted:
"The repository, at Tuwaitha, a centerpiece of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program, . . . . holds more than 500 tons of uranium . . . . Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium."
There you go asshole. LIke I said, what do you think he intended to do with that uranium, and just how confident can you be the Saddam had no intention of expanding his nuke program with all of this war materiel just lying about?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is shit! Nothing solid! Couldn't find what your were talking about w/NY Times. Even NY Times isn't a creditable source. Hmmm.... Tell me one thing genius. Tell me the many different things you can do with Enriched Uranium. Yeah, that's right! Iraq needs power as well as the rest of the world. Tell me, do you think you can just install raw Uranium into a Nuclear Reactor and expect it to work? Don't you have to enrich it in order for it to reach critical mass to react to the plutonium core so it can produce large amounts of energy output?
Let me know "GENIUS"!
----------
Either you are an idiot of a caliber heretofore unknown, or you are simply trying to bait me and piss me off. You don't accept the NY Times as a source, so apparently you only validate sources that agree with what you think.
First of all, you don't need nuclear energy when you're sitting on the number two largest oil source in the middle east. Secondly, it's a moot point because Saddam claimed he had ended his nuclear program after the ceasefire signed in the Gulf War. IN other words, even if he was going to simply build a reactor to nuzzle and snuggle, it was illegal and a justification for war. Are you trying to tell me that you would permit a madman like Hussein to have a nuclear reactor and trust he wouldn't use it to create nukes? We tried that under Clinton. It was called North Korea. They have nukes now. Hussein had enough uranium to build (after enrichment) 142 nuclear bombs. The Israelis knew that Hussein+Reactor= bad, which is why they blew up Osirak.
I'm done as well. You believe what you believe simply because you want to believe it, in defiance of any facts. A bullet is the only real solution to such a person.
Submitted by blujnbbyqn (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:48:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
I believe. Here are some facts you might find interesting:
http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=so05norris
http://www.thebulletin.org/index.htm
Michelle
Submitted by ih8u2man (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:47:03 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
http://nutcase.free.fr/illustre/kidsaa.gif
explains it all. i drank pee today accidentally.
because uber is down i am going nuts. i've begun
peeling my skin again for the first time in 8
weeks. please bart,,,
/sdfvlsdj
'
that was my head....i just passed out....help.';asd
Ssmsd
fdsar80gr=0sdggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
Submitted by rad1101 (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:35:43 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Big Fan, Decided To Give You A -2 For Being A Dipshit
Submitted by CanucksFan (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:17:44 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
dipshit
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:11:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Been there dipshit! We found nothing of the sort.
Hey! Why wasn't it on the NEWS!...? Like CNN for instance. Please forgive me, I'm a little drunk right now, my spelling/typos may not be up to par.
Also, if I told you that NASA doesn't spend 15.6 Billion dollars a year in failed research, would you believe me? I'm sure you would. But, they do! They do and our education systems are suffering from overbudgeting of non-essential government organizations.
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:07:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:01:30 (#)
Ranking: -2
Here's links bitch...
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4661
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/2/220331.shtml
Don't like those sources? How about the NY Times?
Excerpt:
In its May 22, 2004 edition, the New York Times confirmed a myriad of reports on Saddam's nuclear fuel stockpile - and revealed a chilling detail unknown to weapons inspectors before the war: that Saddam had begun to partially enrich his uranium stash.
The Times noted:
"The repository, at Tuwaitha, a centerpiece of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program, . . . . holds more than 500 tons of uranium . . . . Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium."
There you go asshole. LIke I said, what do you think he intended to do with that uranium, and just how confident can you be the Saddam had no intention of expanding his nuke program with all of this war materiel just lying about?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is shit! Nothing solid! Couldn't find what your were talking about w/NY Times. Even NY Times isn't a creditable source. Hmmm.... Tell me one thing genius. Tell me the many different things you can do with Enriched Uranium. Yeah, that's right! Iraq needs power as well as the rest of the world. Tell me, do you think you can just install raw Uranium into a Nuclear Reactor and expect it to work? Don't you have to enrich it in order for it to reach critical mass to react to the plutonium core so it can produce large amounts of energy output?
Let me know "GENIUS"!
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:06:36 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
You can't even spell "credible" (Creditable?), I'm supposed to believe you have a top secret security clearance? I posted two links and quotes from a third source, the NY Times. IF that's not enough, then I guess you'll just have to fly to Iraq before you believe me, which just goes to show you believe what you want to believe, not what reality tells you.
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:03:44 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Like I said before, provide links to your information source. Until you provide links/proof, there is no sense in anyone listening to your remarks. I work for the government. As a matter of fact, I work for the government with a clearance and a need to know things of this sort. If you heard something, maybe it wasn't from a creditable source. So, the next reply you make to this post should contain links/proof to your words. If not, you are just a choad and a mindless drone to society. Let me assure you though, your claims are false! Yeah! I said it! Your a fucking know it all and an idiot!
Now, I'm not saying that I oppose the U.S. presence in Iraq. I was there for well over a year and know that we are doign the people there justice by providing peacekeeping operations and such. I'm drunk right now, so you have to bare with me. Hell, even when I'm shitfaced I think you're an idiot!
I'm done.
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 18:01:30 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Here's links bitch...
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4661
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/2/220331.shtml
Don't like those sources? How about the NY Times?
Excerpt:
In its May 22, 2004 edition, the New York Times confirmed a myriad of reports on Saddam's nuclear fuel stockpile - and revealed a chilling detail unknown to weapons inspectors before the war: that Saddam had begun to partially enrich his uranium stash.
The Times noted:
"The repository, at Tuwaitha, a centerpiece of Saddam Hussein's nuclear weapons program, . . . . holds more than 500 tons of uranium . . . . Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium."
There you go asshole. LIke I said, what do you think he intended to do with that uranium, and just how confident can you be the Saddam had no intention of expanding his nuke program with all of this war materiel just lying about?
Submitted by magical_invisible_torso_man (user info) at 2005-11-12 17:59:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
does anyone have a link to a news story mentioning the findings of any wmd's?
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 17:55:48 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
What do you think he was going to do with enriched uranium, dumbfuck? Sprinkle it on his falafel?
Submitted by Dante_Alighieri (user info) at 2005-11-12 17:46:28 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Laaaaaaame.
Submitted by vettesrule88 (user info) at 2005-11-12 17:00:20 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 16:32:49 (#)
Ranking: 0
-2 for bullshit, since we have found chemicals for nerve gas, sarin-filled shells, and 500 tons of uranium,including 1.8 tons that had been low-level enriched. Fag.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Easy killer. 1) Can you send me a link telling us about these findings? 2) Ingredients aren't exactly WMDs now are they? Many common household goods can be used to make bombs. Now does that mean that I can go and arrest everyone with ingredients that can be used to make bombs in thier houses? Hmmmm...... Nope! Read some more of my posts and see who you are replying to before makikng a offhanded comment. Fag!
------------------------------
if i found sarin filled shells in your house, i would throw your ass so far into jail theyd only find you by the trail of blood from when you hit the wall.
that goes double for enriched uranium
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 16:32:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
-2 for bullshit, since we have found chemicals for nerve gas, sarin-filled shells, and 500 tons of uranium,including 1.8 tons that had been low-level enriched. Fag.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Easy killer. 1) Can you send me a link telling us about these findings? 2) Ingredients aren't exactly WMDs now are they? Many common household goods can be used to make bombs. Now does that mean that I can go and arrest everyone with ingredients that can be used to make bombs in thier houses? Hmmmm...... Nope! Read some more of my posts and see who you are replying to before makikng a offhanded comment. Fag!
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2005-11-12 16:23:59 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
-2 for bullshit, since we have found chemicals for nerve gas, sarin-filled shells, and 500 tons of uranium,including 1.8 tons that had been low-level enriched. Fag.
Submitted by The_Last_Prophet (user info) at 2005-11-12 16:10:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
OUCH!