Brigham professor says bombs, not planes, toppled WTC (555 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -0.94 on 16 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Leroy Brown himself (View user info) at 2005-11-13 13:50:35 EST
User Reviews
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2005-11-14 13:02:24 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2005-11-13 18:33:16 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I love how Method constantly admits his alters, yet I still feel the need to respond to them as if they're real people.
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-11-13 16:01:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:53:48 (#)
Ranking: 0
Leroy's underwear is special. It keeps pushing his shit back inside
until it spews forth from his brain onto the keyboard. Hence, the 9/11 shit. \
-----------
IT's such bullshit. Everyone knows it was the Tibeton's For A Free Arabia who hijacked a US Orbital microwave cannon and turned it on the pilots of the planes to make the pilots comatose at the right time for the planes to slam into the twin towers, that's no secret though.
WHat is interesting is that Osama Bin Laden died on the 23rd of July 1993 in a car accident. So that begs the question, who is doctoring those reports and sending them to the media?
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:53:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Leroy's underwear is special. It keeps pushing his shit back inside
until it spews forth from his brain onto the keyboard. Hence, the 9/11 shit.
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:43:24 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:38:32 (#)
Ranking: 0
They were special scarves, made from Leroy Brown's underwear.
---------
What is so special about LEEEEEEEEEEROY's underwear?
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:38:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
They were special scarves, made from Leroy Brown's underwear.
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:34:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:29:31 (#)
Ranking: 0
Yeah, and I saw "Towering Inferno" 22 times, man.
--------
Ah dude! Is that that wacky shit with the guy lowering the people in an office chair with scarves tied around it?
That shit was waack motherfucker!
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:29:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Yeah, and I saw "Towering Inferno" 22 times, man.
Submitted by Berty (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:26:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
What twaddle, I saw the planes hit on tv and whilst I may have been a little stoned I've seen Die Hard 2 enough times to know what an exploding plane looks like.
Submitted by Jesus_Loves_TwEE (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:24:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
The offical story is such bullshit, and a lot of people can see through it.
GOP memo touts new terror attack as way to reverse party's decline.
http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&q=GOP+memo+9%2F11
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2005-11-13 15:15:06 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Uber does work. Click here to see what I mean: http://www.ubersite.com/m/79127
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2005-11-13 14:11:46 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Leroy Brown, Professor Emeritus, Flat Earth Society. . .
Submitted by Feijuada (user info) at 2005-11-13 14:11:41 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I hate these conspiracy theorist bastards.
Submitted by youarsoghey (user info) at 2005-11-13 14:02:04 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Oh, but thanks for letting me post this again:
Submitted by youarsoghey (user info) at 2005-08-28 12:52:42 (#)
Ranking: -2
DER, DER, I HAVE SELECTIVE HEARING, DUR, DUR!
http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/latest/wtc.php
OH NO! BUT MY ENGINEERS KNOW MORE ABOUT PHSYICS AND CHEMISTRY!!!
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR CONSPIRACY THEORY!!! THAT'S WHAT IT IS! ANY ENGINEER WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH MY FACTS ARE IN ON THE CONSPIRACY!
http://www.caddigest.com/subjects/wtc/select/clifton/p1.htm
DER DER DER--DUH-DUH--DERRR! THIS CONSPIRACY IS GROWING LARGER AND IT IS BECOMING APPARENT THAT I AM ONE OF THE ONLY ONES WHO KNOWS WHAT THE TRUTH IS!! THANK GOD THIS DISCREDITED ENGINEER IS STILL ON MY SIDE TO PREACH THE TRUTH BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT IS!
http://wtc.nist.gov/
NOOOOOO!!!! ENOUGH WITH THE LIES! WHY CAN NOBODY SEE THAT MY FACTS ARE THE TRUTH?? THERE'S A CONSPIRACY AND EVERYONE'S IN ON IT! EVERYONE DECIDED ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 TO SUDDENLY BECOME EXTREMELY GOOD AT KEEPING SECRETS AND THAT'S WHY NOBODY IS TELLING THE TRUTH! MEE MEEE MEEEEEEE! MY LIFE IS IMPORTANT AND I HAVE KNOWLEDGE NOBODY ELSE DOES!!! CONSPIRACY! CONSPIRACY! DER!
Submitted by youarsoghey (user info) at 2005-11-13 13:59:58 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
This retardation again?
Submitted by Leroy_Brown (user info) at 2005-11-13 13:52:08 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
By Elaine Jarvik
Deseret Morning News
The physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.
In fact, it's likely that there were "pre-positioned explosives" in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.
In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.
Jones, who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, international scientific investigation "guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by observations and calculations.
"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," Jones writes.
As for speculation about who might have planted the explosives, Jones said, "I don't usually go there. There's no point in doing that until we do the scientific investigation."
Previous investigations, including those of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institutes of Standards and Technology), ignore the physics and chemistry of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, to the Twin Towers and the 47-story building known as WTC 7, he says. The official explanation — that fires caused structural damage that caused the buildings to collapse — can't be backed up by either testing or history, he says.
Jones acknowledges that there have been "junk science" conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11, but "the explosive demolition hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony and therefore is not 'junk science.' "
In a 9,000-word article that Jones says will be published in the book "The Hidden History of 9/11," by Elsevier, Jones offers these arguments:
• The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically, falling down into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with "controlled demolition" — and even then it's very difficult, he says. "Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan?" Jones asks. "And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? The 'symmetry data' emphasized here, along with other data, provide strong evidence for an 'inside' job."
• No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel columns, he says.
• WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6 seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object dropped from the roof to hit the ground. "Where is the delay that must be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational laws of physics?" he asks. "That is, as upper-falling floors strike lower floors — and intact steel support columns — the fall must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings?" The paradox, he says, "is easily resolved by the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly removed lower-floor material, including steel support columns, and allow near free-fall-speed collapses." These observations were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.
• With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were falling, he says. "How can we understand this strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable, amazing — and demanding scrutiny since the U.S. government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon."
• Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were observed proceeding up the side the building, a phenomenon common when pre-positioned explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.
• Steel supports were "partly evaporated," but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel — and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at most a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.
• Molten metal found in the debris of the World Trade Center may have been the result of a high-temperature reaction of a commonly used explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled by explosives "have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal," Jones says.
• Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far below the region where the planes struck, he says.
Jones says he became interested in the physics of the WTC collapse after attending a talk last spring given by a woman who had had a near-death experience. The woman mentioned in passing that "if you think the World Trade Center buildings came down just due to fire, you have a lot of surprises ahead of you," Jones remembers, at which point "everyone around me started applauding."
Following several months of study, he presented his findings at a talk at BYU in September.
Jones says he would like the government to release 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage for "independent scrutiny." He would also like to analyze a small sample of the molten metal found at Ground Zero.