i agree (517 hits)
Category: NoneRating: -1.54 on 12 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Rochalle Racine <rochalle.04.at.gmail.com> (View user info) at 2006-01-04 01:11:40 EST
honestly i agree with most of you...my title is good but the story just didn't come out the way i had planned. it's better in person than on paper...but w/e thanks for the feedback
User Reviews
Submitted by simple_catalyst (user info) at 2006-01-04 12:21:46 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
joy!
Submitted by phuzzygish (user info) at 2006-01-04 10:15:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
So you're uh... new around these parts then... huh?
Submitted by HighVoltage900 (user info) at 2006-01-04 10:09:08 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
This post made my eyes pop out, my testicles bleed, my nipples squirt acid, my hands break off, my kneecaps split off, and my nose, mouth, and ass seal themselves shut.
All in all, it was not a good reading experience. Please be raped by several large black men.
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2006-01-04 09:54:20 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
what he said
|
|
V
Submitted by SilvrWolf (user info) at 2006-01-04 09:49:05 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Dear concerthead,
For any comments concerning your posts, click the link that says, "Rate this item" on said post and reply to your heart's content. There is no need to create another post. If you continue to do so, you'll be told to go die and perform various other unspeakable acts upon yourself.
Thanks,
Management
P.S. -2die
Submitted by fluff (user info) at 2006-01-04 03:50:54 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
No Comment
Submitted by jgreening (user info) at 2006-01-04 02:29:46 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
2759 reviews later, and re: 16 y/olds is still an icon of Uber.
And it's still a better post than this is.
Submitted by a_reader (user info) at 2006-01-04 02:17:46 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
http://img36.exs.cx/img36/1078/fuckingnoob.jpg
Submitted by maiorano84 (user info) at 2006-01-04 02:12:14 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Have you ever heard of the Butterfly Effect? It's pretty cool, stuff. Here's an explanation from Wikipedia:
The butterfly effect is a phrase that encapsulates the more technical notion of sensitive dependence on initial conditions in chaos theory. The idea is that small variations in the initial conditions of a dynamical system produce large variations in the long term behavior of the system. Sensitive dependence is also found in non-dynamical systems: for example, a ball placed at the crest of a hill might roll into any of several valleys depending on slight differences in initial position.
The practical consequence of the butterfly effect is that complex systems such as the weather are difficult to predict past a certain time range - approximately a week, in the case of weather. This is because any finite model that attempts to simulate a system must necessarily truncate some information about the initial conditions—for example, when simulating the weather, one would not be able to include the wind coming from every butterfly's wings. In all practical cases, defects in the knowledge of the initial conditions and deficiencies in the model are equally important sources of error. In a chaotic system, these errors are magnified as the simulation progresses. Thus the predictions of the simulation are useless after a certain finite amount of time.
Edward Lorenz first analyzed the effect in a 1963 paper for the New York Academy of Sciences. According to the paper, "One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a seagull's wings could change the course of weather forever." Later speeches and papers by Lorenz used the more poetic butterfly, possibly inspired by the diagram generated by the Lorenz attractor, which looks like a butterfly; other theories propose that the phrase's basis is to be found in fiction (Ray Bradbury's 1952 story "A Sound of Thunder"), but there is no proof available that Lorenz was swayed by literary precedent. The idea is now often stated something to the effect of, "a butterfly flapping its wings in Tokyo could create yet another tard on Ubersite."
Man.... that's some harsh stuff. Maybe you should go back in time and save your user ID number for somebody who actually has a fully-functional brain.
Submitted by jgreening (user info) at 2006-01-04 01:52:37 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
What...
The...
Fuck...
I want my 7.2 seconds back.
With interest, it's like 7.93 seconds.
Submitted by Yams (user info) at 2006-01-04 01:51:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
It was smart of you to post this early in the morning. I would go so far as to say the wee hours. You will get a lot of shit for this tomorrow, but I think we will see "I AM A DORITO" or whatever it was resurfacing very soon.
I still see "But whom killed him, and why?" every now and then, and it wasn't nearly as notorious as the re: post.
Submitted by Chroniclysm (user info) at 2006-01-04 01:17:16 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
What the fuck. I actually regret the +2 on the story because of this.
What IS this?