Owning Sex-Pests Makes Me Feel Good! NSFW! NSFW! (3500 hits)
Category: GeneralRating: -0.29 on 101 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by iago (View user info) at 2006-02-06 17:28:13 EST
The back-story to this is fairly self-explanatory from the email:
I know this turdfucker who trolls internet chatrooms for young girls to have sex with. This doesn't really bother me too much, as it's a really lame thing to do. Kind of an admission of failing at life, having to resort to anonymity to get girls.
Did I tell you he sends me the pictures of them? 'Cool,' I thought. Might as well check out what kind of girls go for that kind of thing. But I'll get to that later on.
So he'd tell me all this retarded bullshit about how he'd get them, and how he masturbates when he's doing it. By now your probably thinking 'why would you want to keep talking to him?' and it's for amusements sake alone. I'm a fairly normal type of chap, and I always thought he was funny, in a crippled midget type of way.
The last one was over the line, the wretch kept telling me about this 16 year old he had going on, and send me the nude pics of her too. He's 24. So I decided enough is enough, and show at least one chick what he's like.
So I sent her an email. Along with all the pics he had sent to me. And in the interest of smutty porn, hambeasts and being an asshole, im posting some of the tamer ones up. She's 18 . Beware, she's hideous. Seriously HORRIBLE - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. THIS IS NOT THE 16 YO.
And to all the people who say 'Fuck you, you're just as bad for posting the pics, -2DIE.' Eat me. She's 18, and any chick that inflicts these on ANYONE deserves punishment. "Your a fucker/whatever." You don't like it, and I don't care.
Im not preaching morality here, just sharing a moment of happiness I had.
Sorry for the lack of eloquence in the e-mail, but it was rushed.
User Reviews
Submitted by The_Cyst_Master (user info) at 2006-03-10 13:08:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
WINNER! http://www.ubersite.com/m/84913
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2006-02-09 05:01:31 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
What the fuck is that?! Does that thing have acne on it's breasts? Dude! What the fuck!?
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-02-08 19:21:28 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by DrRobertHand (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:51:33 (#)
Ranking: 1
Interesting read but what's the deal with the hate on that picture? Most women actually are not supermodels. I guess to each his own, but calling what appears to be a pretty normal looking woman "hideous" tells me you may be due for some harsh disappointment.
----------------------
????????????
what the fuck? There is boob acne, and there appears to be rolls of fat above her boobs.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-08 18:33:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-08 18:19:28 (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-07 20:19:07 (#)
Ranking: 0
yeah that's true but I can't imagine there's a place where a 24 year old can legally have sex with a 16 year old in America
----------------------------------
Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, Alabama.
-----------------------
Bullshit.
=====================
Would you two faggots stop stalking this post?
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2006-02-08 18:27:24 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
but still fugly
Submitted by Caulaincourt (user info) at 2006-02-08 18:27:13 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
she's hotter than most uber gals
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-08 18:19:28 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-07 20:19:07 (#)
Ranking: 0
yeah that's true but I can't imagine there's a place where a 24 year old can legally have sex with a 16 year old in America
----------------------------------
Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, Alabama.
-----------------------
Bullshit.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-07 20:19:07 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
yeah that's true but I can't imagine there's a place where a 24 year old can legally have sex with a 16 year old in America
----------------------------------
Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, Alabama.
Submitted by c1ndy (user info) at 2006-02-07 13:56:02 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
pointless
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-07 13:29:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2006-02-07 10:10:18 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:36:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
first of all, you're basing this off of the government's definition of a minor, which in canada is 16. in the US it's 18. so you would believe that in canada a 16 year old having sex with a 24 year old is ok because the gov defines them as adults, but in the US the exact same sex is not ok?
------------
it varies from state to state. age of consent in ct is like 16, i know in some states it's as low as 14 with age difference rules applying. usually around the no more than four years difference area. i think in some states you can get married as young as 13 with parental consent, but that might just be for eastern mountain critter states and the scarier places in the deep south.
yeah that's true but I can't imagine there's a place where a 24 year old can legally have sex with a 16 year old in America
Submitted by NotSteve (user info) at 2006-02-07 10:58:54 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Never seen titties with herpes, before.
Submitted by Foonbo (user info) at 2006-02-07 10:58:15 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Ewww.
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2006-02-07 10:10:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:36:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
first of all, you're basing this off of the government's definition of a minor, which in canada is 16. in the US it's 18. so you would believe that in canada a 16 year old having sex with a 24 year old is ok because the gov defines them as adults, but in the US the exact same sex is not ok?
------------
it varies from state to state. age of consent in ct is like 16, i know in some states it's as low as 14 with age difference rules applying. usually around the no more than four years difference area. i think in some states you can get married as young as 13 with parental consent, but that might just be for eastern mountain critter states and the scarier places in the deep south.
Submitted by The_taste_of_Monkeys (user info) at 2006-02-07 09:51:17 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
Submitted by Affinity (user info) at 2006-02-07 08:18:39 (#)
Ranking: -1
there is somthing in the delicate way she lifts her
udder and touches her tongue against the pap that
contributes strongly to an increasing sense of
malaise I have been experiencing.
I think the internet has finally destroyed my
appreciation of the aesthetic.
Thanks a lot ass munch
Yes.
Submitted by Affinity (user info) at 2006-02-07 08:18:39 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
there is somthing in the delicate way she lifts her
udder and touches her tongue against the pap that
contributes strongly to an increasing sense of
malaise I have been experiencing.
I think the internet has finally destroyed my
appreciation of the aesthetic.
Thanks a lot ass munch
Submitted by Sphagnum (user info) at 2006-02-07 08:11:08 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Man I'm stupid. I actually subjected myself to the other reviews after rating this.
*sigh*
LERN HOW TOO SPILL LESSED YU LUOOK FOLLLLISH!!
Submitted by saint_sebastian (user info) at 2006-02-07 08:06:36 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Are you fucking kidding?
Submitted by Sphagnum (user info) at 2006-02-07 08:03:21 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Every single word of this post contributed to complete confirmation that you are an utter moron.
Why would anyone give a fuck what you and your boyfriend do to children on the internet?
Your more of a fuckstain than he will ever be for posting any of this.
I hope he infects you with AIDS while he's ear-fucking you and you both die slow, painful deaths at the bottom of a volcano.
Submitted by Nellypaal (user info) at 2006-02-07 06:37:47 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Yup, she's pretty fucking hideous.
Submitted by Jacobt26 (user info) at 2006-02-07 06:31:23 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Worse...Than...Urbane.
Submitted by DarthAwesome (user info) at 2006-02-06 23:41:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I think I read a comment towards the bottom where a fellow was trying to say that this beast of a girl wasn't ugly. That guy has some low standards.
What is wrong with calling it how it is? If you met me you'd say I was a bit creepy. I'm alright with that. If your ta-tas have numerous spots and sag down to your belly button, I'm probably gonna call you a cow.
Submitted by AsshOly (user info) at 2006-02-06 23:35:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Whoever it was who said she looks normal is COMPLETELY out of his fucking mind. She's a wildebeast.
Submitted by ScottPeterson (user info) at 2006-02-06 23:00:20 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
under the guise of maintaining the moral high-ground, you've managed to go from an
enabler>to a voyeur>to (quite possibly, given the chance) a practioneer
Congratulations!
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 22:43:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:33:15 (#)
Ranking: 0
My argument is that he holds his morals above the law, and he is lashing out at another for having beliefs similar to that of the law and not ones which are similar to what he believes in.
The law should be the final word on the matter.
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:36:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
first of all, you're basing this off of the government's definition of a minor, which in canada is 16. in the US it's 18. so you would believe that in canada a 16 year old having sex with a 24 year old is ok because the gov defines them as adults, but in the US the exact same sex is not ok?
Submitted by inion_de_trua (user info) at 2006-02-06 22:37:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
i still wish my boobs were that big. maybe she's willing to do a boob transplant.
Submitted by The_Cyst_Master (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:54:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
OMGGFFFGGG!!! +2 FOR AWESOME TITTIESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!
Submitted by sl4tt3ry (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:49:42 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:48:47 (#)
Ranking: -2
get a fucking life.
....................................
Seriously, we all know that this 'guy' is you.
You suck at life
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:33:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
My argument is that he holds his morals above the law, and he is lashing out at another for having beliefs similar to that of the law and not ones which are similar to what he believes in.
The law should be the final word on the matter.
Submitted by Dead_0hi0_Sky (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:27:08 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
HOLY SHIT! those are my girlfriend's tits!
what are they doing on the internet?
most importantly, what are they doing on some fat chick?
wait.....
who is that agian?
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:24:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
the legality of the matter needs to be entirely ignored because it's a moral issue. The law exists because it is a moral issue.
Everyone has a different opinion on when it's ok for adults to screw younger people...and the fact that the UK and the US have a different stipulation on that law is proof of the former fact.
Arguing about the law is retarded.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:16:30 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Dreg, DMD got you, I got you, Iago, being the retard he is, got you, Even UNABONGER got you, and all he did was say like 12 words. Stop.
Your debate is meaningless and filled with holes, stop trying to drive your point home. You're a sick fuck and nobody here cares or values your horrendous opinion. Just stop.
Submitted by HighVoltage900 (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:15:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 for moral fiber.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 21:06:32 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
hmm a moron that doesn't know anything about mental development
--------------------------------------
If the government thought that the necessary mental development for sexual activities didn't take place until a person turned a certain age, they would make laws about that age. And for the majority of the U.S. it is 16 also.
As to if it is ok or not depending on the area, I don't care if it is acceptable by my moral standards, only that it is legal or not. Everyone has different morals, therefor it is up to their respective governments to come up with an acceptable system to live in. If you don't like it try to change it or leave, but don't act as if your opinion is the absolute uthority on the subject.
Submitted by forensicgirl3 (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:43:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The frontal cortex does not finish developing until age 21.
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:36:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
hmm a moron that doesn't know anything about mental development
first of all, you're basing this off of the government's definition of a minor, which in canada is 16. in the US it's 18. so you would believe that in canada a 16 year old having sex with a 24 year old is ok because the gov defines them as adults, but in the US the exact same sex is not ok?
second of all, the equivocation of age difference to a point where both parties are completely developed emotionally is ridiculous. 16 year olds are practically retarded, they shouldn't be doing anything but reading the catcher in the rye, much less banging some piece of shit 8 years older
third, the type of 24 year old male who deems it acceptable to go after a socially and emotionally immature girl is pathetic and disgusting, a loser of the highest degree, and a predator
Submitted by forensicgirl3 (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:19:57 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Giving you a +2 for ruining this perv's game.
But.....
18 or not, I don't think you should have posted her pics here. It really accomplished nothing except for comments about her appearance. Although (hopefully) she'll never see this post, she will be humiliated enough just from someone informing her that her pics are being flung around.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:12:28 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
It's on heated.
Mission Accomplished.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 20:05:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:47:36 (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:36:15 (#)
Ranking: 0
Bonger, let's take this to heated. ASL? WANNA FUCK?
DU U LIKE OLDA BOYZ?
_____________
Y HELO THAR!
I"M onLy 16!!111one
-------------
JUST THE WAY I LIKE EM
IM 67 I MEAN 12.
WANT2FUX?
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:59:35 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Dreg, you're like a puppy, small, stupid and devoid of understanding.
The puppy needs a shit in the garden, but walks into a glass door, and falls over. Puppy doesn't understand the idea that he wont be able to get though, as he cant see anything wrong with this situation. So he keeps hitting his head, not seeing that the other door is open, leading to the garden to where the puppy can have a shit.
Puppy does this all day and is eventually retarded from being hit on the head. Puppy can no longer do anything but vomit and shit on itself.
This is the stage you are at.
Owner cannot afford a vet, so mashes puppy's head in with a brick.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:56:38 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Iago, in essence you are persecuting someone for not having the same moral beliefs as you.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:53:07 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:51:53 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
When you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. When you have the law on your side, argue the law. When you have neither, holler.
Al Gore
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:51:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
one more +2 simply because I just got the DVD of Pink Floyd in concert in 1980 on the Wall tour.
so I got that going for me.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:50:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:43:43 (#)
Ranking: -2
If you don't see the difference between people doing something illegal, like minors having sex, and people doing something legal, like a 16 year old having sex with whoever the hell she wants, than there is nothing I can do to help you.
If you don't like the fact that the law is that way get it changed. Would you have a problem if it was a 16 year old female and a 17 year old guy? The age gap doesn't matter at all when it comes to consenting adults, and she is considered a consenting adult.
=============
Oh, so because they are LEGALLY a woman, they can be fucked like theres no tomorrow, right? Bullshit. In SOME cases, yeah that's right. But a 16 year old girl will not be as developed mentally and emotionally as a 35 year old girl. SOME of them wont be ready for a sexual relationship, and in many cases, those who look for internet cases especially wont be.
YOU JUST CANT COMPARE THGE MENTAL AND PHYSICAL STATES OF A 16 YEAR OLD GIRL AND 35 YEAR OLD WOMAN. Just because they have the same legal rights does not make them similar in the least.
LOOK TO YOURSELF FOR GUIDANCE. Theres no need to follow the law blindly, and justify your actions with legality. Everyone has their own sets of morals and goes by them, within the law. So you can kill people legally if they are on your property, fine, but that dosent make it right or moralistic. Just because you can plow a 16 year old dosent make it right.
This is basic shit your parents should have taught you.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:49:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:46:56 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:43:43 (#)
If you don't see the difference between people doing something illegal, like minors having sex, and people doing something legal, like a 16 year old having sex with whoever the hell she wants, than there is nothing I can do to help you.
--
It's illegal to fuck a 16 year old if you're over 18 in every state except Nevada, so I ask: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
----------------------------------
THIS GUY IS BRITISH.
And 16 is the age in michigan also.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:47:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:36:15 (#)
Ranking: 0
Bonger, let's take this to heated. ASL? WANNA FUCK?
DU U LIKE OLDA BOYZ?
_____________
Y HELO THAR!
I"M onLy 16!!111one
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:46:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:43:43 (#)
If you don't see the difference between people doing something illegal, like minors having sex, and people doing something legal, like a 16 year old having sex with whoever the hell she wants, than there is nothing I can do to help you.
--
It's illegal to fuck a 16 year old if you're over 18 in every state except Nevada, so I ask: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:43:43 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
What is it, a fucking full moon around here?
You argued on the basis of "Same age difference." as shown by THREE SERERATE PEOPLE, in thier own wonderfully eloquent ways, your mechaism is fucked. Yeah, so a huge age difference is OK when people are old and about to die, but not IN THIS SITUATION. NOT WITH A 24yo v.s. 16yo.
---------------------------------------
If you don't see the difference between people doing something illegal, like minors having sex, and people doing something legal, like a 16 year old having sex with whoever the hell she wants, than there is nothing I can do to help you.
If you don't like the fact that the law is that way get it changed. Would you have a problem if it was a 16 year old female and a 17 year old guy? The age gap doesn't matter at all when it comes to consenting adults, and she is considered a consenting adult.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:42:30 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
What is it, a fucking full moon around here?
---
that made me laugh
BONGER WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU
I typed your name as BONER originally and realized there was no G, and then I cried.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:38:46 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Which of us needed to think here? I presented two legal examples of where intercourse could happen, you presented two illegal examples. Though the age difference is the same, they are different according to the law.
-----------------
What is it, a fucking full moon around here?
You argued on the basis of "Same age difference." as shown by THREE SERERATE PEOPLE, in thier own wonderfully eloquent ways, your mechaism is fucked. Yeah, so a huge age difference is OK when people are old and about to die, but not IN THIS SITUATION. NOT WITH A 24yo v.s. 16yo.
Any more for any more?
oh, and i didnt spellcheck anything. It was GLARING AWAY.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:36:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Iago- it was over, i wasnt keeping the battle going with the Illegal comment, I just wanted to see how far I could take it
nice job spellchecking all of my comments to find fallacies
Dreg you're a fucking retard.
Bonger, let's take this to heated. ASL? WANNA FUCK?
DU U LIKE OLDA BOYZ?
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:35:02 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Basically Iago is making the case here that his moral beliefs are more important than that of the government which he belongs to and his therefor he is justified in his hatred towards his "friend".
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:33:19 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
a 34 year old woman is an adult and is done developing physically and emotionally.
-----------------
According to legal definition of this particular case a 16 year old woman is also an adult.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:32:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I want heat for the braille titties.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:31:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
or Follish, for that matter.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:31:35 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:28:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
===============
so its ok for an 18 year old to fuck a 10 year old?
someone who's 20 to fuck a 12 year old?
By your reasoning it is.
THINK BEFORE POSTING LEST YOU LOOK FOOLISH.
-----------------
Which of us needed to think here? I presented two legal examples of where intercourse could happen, you presented two illegal examples. Though the age difference is the same, they are different according to the law.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:30:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
___________________
a 34 year old woman is an adult and is done developing physically and emotionally.
I'd say it's a pretty big fucking difference.
but what do I know? I tried to use duct tape to wax my balls and I'm bleeding now.
I gotta go to the hospital.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:28:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
===============
so its ok for an 18 year old to fuck a 10 year old?
someone who's 20 to fuck a 12 year old?
By your reasoning it is.
THINK BEFORE POSTING LEST YOU LOOK FOOLISH.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:27:40 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
---
no, tardo
think about it, a fifteen year old boy fucks your seven year old daughter
how right is that? SAME AGE DIFFERENCE, NURRR.
Age difference doesn't mean shit- a 16 year old shouldn't fuck a 24 year old. Plain and god damned simple.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:26:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
"Well said, Child mollestor." like people who cant spell molester?
Even if you got it the first time or not, please PRETEND.
Dont grammarwhore, its always the last refuge of someone who hasn't got anything to say.
Submitted by ampersand (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:25:46 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Those pictures were uncalled for and I don't care if you warned us or not.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:24:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Is is wrong for a 42 year old man to date a 34 year old woman? Same age difference. The fact that you are chastising someone who is doing nothing "wrong" as dictated by the government in essence just means you are cock blocking him.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:19:14 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:14:19 (#)
Ranking: 0
Why is that a contradiction? Morally im opposed to it. Legality i dont care.
Like i think that smoking weed isnt bad, bit its illigal.
Like i think abortions should be illigal, but they are not.
--------------
Anyone who can't spell ILLEGAL shouldn't have a fucking say in what's legal or not.
Kill yourself.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:16:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
whatever. cut your hair and put down teh weed, hippy.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:14:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Why is that a contradiction? Morally im opposed to it. Legality i dont care.
Like i think that smoking weed isnt bad, bit its illigal.
Like i think abortions should be illigal, but they are not.
Submitted by matnotharry (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:12:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
ooh braille
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:12:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
You never hit a nerve, I don't have any.
You're taking this too personally, Parrot. I got it the first time.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:11:55 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:08:14 (#)
Ranking: 0
IF YOU NEED IT REITERATED AGAIN - i only decided to do it AFTER he told me about his 16 year old, as i thought it was such an AMORAL AND DISGUSTING THING TO DO.
THERE IS ONLY SO MANY TIMES I CAN SAY THIS
____________
but the morality of it is why there is/could be a law against it and you claimed the legality didn't provoke your actions...
AH! CONTRADICTION!!!! AAAAHHHH!
...I'm done now.
Submitted by thecaes (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:10:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:08:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I like Deconstruction already.
tits = auto +2...even if they are braille titties.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:08:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
IF YOU NEED IT REITERATED AGAIN - i only decided to do it AFTER he told me about his 16 year old, as i thought it was such an AMORAL AND DISGUSTING THING TO DO.
THERE IS ONLY SO MANY TIMES I CAN SAY THIS
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 19:06:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Well said, Child mollestor.
You're right, IM the internet tough-guy who can't take rejection: Which is why IM bickering over a negative rating.
Oh wait.
Please be more understanding, as the onslaught of verbal abuse you're handing me is bringing unstoppable thoughts of suicide that may evolve into real act rather than thought.
I'm so embarassed now that you've exposed me for the insecurity I really am.
=========
Dude, your a mongoloid. Pure and simple. Its awesome you resort to calling me a child molester. You must have an IQ of 40+, barely enough for you to be able to remember to breathe whislt sleeping.
If you remember, i used all of FOUR words, and because of your huge complex youve had an exponential reaction to it. Ive hit a raw nerve and then rubbed vinegar into it. Now your acting like a total drooling retard.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:59:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:51:12 (#)
Ranking: 0
Quite simply, if its that easy YOU DO it then. But then being the internet tough-guy whos a paranoid bumblefuck in real life isn't ready for that is he?
---
Well said, Child mollestor.
You're right, IM the internet tough-guy who can't take rejection: Which is why IM bickering over a negative rating.
Oh wait.
Please be more understanding, as the onslaught of verbal abuse you're handing me is bringing unstoppable thoughts of suicide that may evolve into real act rather than thought.
I'm so embarassed now that you've exposed me for the insecurity I really am.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:51:12 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Quite simply, if its that easy YOU DO it then. But then being the internet tough-guy whos a paranoid bumblefuck in real life isn't ready for that is he?
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:48:47 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
get a fucking life.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:46:18 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I was mocking what you call "contribution", twit.
Anyone can make a post about his "friend" that smashes sixteen year olds begging for acceptance and a "bad girl" image. That isn't CONTRIBUTION, and there aren't any rules that force me to post or become some inactive account. I contribute by reading and rating accordingly.
But whatever, your internet dick is longer than mine because you have a collection of AMAZING posts.
Submitted by badassmofo (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:45:12 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
'Fuck you, you're just as bad for posting the pics, -2DIE
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:42:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
User id: 24097
Registered on or around: 2005-12-15 22:41:17
# Messages posted: 0 <------------------------- No. As in CONTRIBUTE or get out.
# Reviews written: 414
# Times these posts have been reviewed : 0
# Hits: 0
Average rating of all messages: 0.00
Do you need it a third time?
And as you clearly have problems reading & understanding, ill also repeat for you that this girl is 18 AND HENCE NOT CHILD PORN.
Apart from inventing a braille internet for you, i dont see what else i can do here.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:38:42 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:32:02 (#)
Ranking: 0
Deconstruction = contribute or get out.
----
So All I have to do is open the window to my pathetic Child Porn and Underaged Rape filled life and I'll be accepted by the Uber Elite that is Iago?
Finally the answers have been given to me. Now, I can live!
Submitted by ScottPeterson (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:38:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
moo 11 down
Submitted by polyamorousaj (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:35:18 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I really did almost puke a little.
Submitted by Death_Metal_Dude (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:35:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by DrRobertHand (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:51:33 (#)
Ranking: 1
Interesting read but what's the deal with the hate on that picture? Most women actually are not supermodels. I guess to each his own, but calling what appears to be a pretty normal looking woman "hideous" tells me you may be due for some harsh disappointment.
you wouldn't be saying that if it wasn't the only thing you could get
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:32:37 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
*irony of typo* i mean FOOLISH.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:32:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
redskieslookfake = READ BEFORE POSTING LEST YOU LOOK FOLLISH
OneCheapGeek = Wow dude, your a winner.
Deconstruction = contribute or get out.
Submitted by redskieslookfake (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:29:26 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Child porn? Charming.
Submitted by OneCheapGeek (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:25:39 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
For using firefox but not tabbed browsing.
Submitted by Deconstruction (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:20:48 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
You're probably just as sick of a Predator as he is, you filthy slime.
Rot in Hell.
Submitted by Demos74 (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:13:30 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I wanna hurl. But you did do the right thing, people like that should be fed to zombies.
Submitted by belowground (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:05:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Correction: I reread it, and realized that it's not the 16 y/o. The body acne comment still applies, though.
Submitted by belowground (user info) at 2006-02-06 18:02:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
What you've done here in terms of content is really excellent, and you're obviously a very good person with other people's best interests at heart. Plus fucking two, I commend you.
OTOH, although I enjoy tits as much as the next guy, I don't think posting pictures of the girl was necessary at all. Firstly, she's 16, which I find unsettling, and second, her breasts appear to have body acne on them.
Could've done without it, man.
Submitted by Jeanneee (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:59:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Damn that's fucked up. You did the right thing.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:53:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by DrRobertHand (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:51:33 (#)
Ranking: 1
Interesting read but what's the deal with the hate on that picture? Most women actually are not supermodels. I guess to each his own, but calling what appears to be a pretty normal looking woman "hideous" tells me you may be due for some harsh disappointment.
=============
You wouldnt be saying that if you saw the other pictures of her.
Submitted by EvilGav (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:52:47 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:43:58 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:41:01 (#)
Ranking: 1
In some areas it is legal to have sex with a 16 year old, but if he has pictures of her naked or videotapes them having sex he is charged with child pornography
===========
I couldnt give a monkey's fuck about the legality/ child porn of it (im a brit, so its legal if she's 16 - or is that just fucking them? rather than distributing naked + hardcore?) i just found it disgustingly amoral and thought id try to fuck him a bit.
---------------------------
Legal to fuck a 16 year old in the UK, not legal to take a picture or film them naked till they're 18.
Could you re-do the wiping out of the girls e-mail address, it doesn't take a genius very long to work out what it is . . .
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:51:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:49:12 (#)
Ranking: -1
16 is legal to have pictures of in the U.K. And if this is all about you taking a moral high ground over someone who i complying with the law then i need to drop my rating of you down to 0.
========
Good on you for the legality aspect of it. I think you thought i was being aggressive towards you. I wasn't. Im just saying the legality of it wasnt my motivation for fucking him.
Submitted by DrRobertHand (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:51:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Interesting read but what's the deal with the hate on that picture? Most women actually are not supermodels. I guess to each his own, but calling what appears to be a pretty normal looking woman "hideous" tells me you may be due for some harsh disappointment.
Submitted by AsshOly (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:50:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
+2!!
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:49:12 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
16 is legal to have pictures of in the U.K. And if this is all about you taking a moral high ground over someone who i complying with the law then i need to drop my rating of you down to 0.
Submitted by Iago (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:43:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:41:01 (#)
Ranking: 1
In some areas it is legal to have sex with a 16 year old, but if he has pictures of her naked or videotapes them having sex he is charged with child pornography
===========
I couldnt give a monkey's fuck about the legality/ child porn of it (im a brit, so its legal if she's 16 - or is that just fucking them? rather than distributing naked + hardcore?) i just found it disgustingly amoral and thought id try to fuck him a bit.
Submitted by Dreg (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:41:01 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
In some areas it is legal to have sex with a 16 year old, but if he has pictures of her naked or videotapes them having sex he is charged with child pornography
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:36:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Forward his email address to Special Agent Jenkins at porntaskforce.at.fbi.gov
Submitted by leilani (user info) at 2006-02-06 17:36:08 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
what the hell ,man....