9/11 Tower Collapse REVEALED!!! (1045 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 0.4 on 44 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by niphilim (View user info) at 2006-06-12 18:12:22 EDT
Over the past few years many groups, organizations and individuals have clouded our minds with tales, useless facts, and plain-out-shit to cover up the true story behind the September 11th, 2001 World Trade Center collapse.
I myself even admit to jumping in on the subject recently and playing a bit of Devil's Advocate.
So, to clear my good name (nephilim is a good name isn't it), I offer you clear photographic evidence revealing the true cause of the WTC collapse.
Now before you dismiss this photograph, I promise you that it was received through a reputable source. So, Pthhhhh! (Sticks out tongue and blows)
So, here it is, the final debunk/ bunk all conspiracy theories evidence. If you look carefully at the area designated by the red arrow you will clearly see an anomaly focusing on the true cause of the tower demolition.
.
. .
. . .
User Reviews
Submitted by nephilim (user info) at 2006-06-14 10:30:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
SNAKES ON A MOTHER FUCKING PLANE!!!
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-06-13 21:07:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by nephilim (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:45:56 (#)
Ranking: -2
FUCK!!! I did spell my own name wrong...
+++++
You have lost all credibility on this site. Now is the time
to jump out of a 110 story burning building. . .
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-13 20:57:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
IT WAS THE SNAKES!!!!
SNAKES ON A MUTHA-FUCKEN PLAAAAAANE!!!!!
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-13 20:51:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by earth_collapse (user info) at 2006-06-12 23:03:16 (#)
Ranking: 0
In a controlled demolition, the charges are detonated in sequential order beginning at the top of the building and then working it's way down until the last floor is pulled.
Whether or not I believe theadmiral's conspiracy theory, or any involving 9/11, is not the issue. What the issue is, is that many things were not entirely investigated in the WTC and 9/11 reports. Until I am supplied with factual and comprehensive information regarding the WTC buildings, I cannot believe anything.
Most likely there will always be a shroud of mystery, providing for every conspiracy theorist a wet dream.
-------------
Jeesus Christ, you braindead cunt. In a controlled demolition the charges are usually detonated in order FROM THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP. The idea is to make the building IMPLODE, not explode. AND you would SEE all the charges going off a second or two BEFORE it fell. Try watching Discovery Channel a bit more instead of just making retarded (and WRONG) assumptions.
Here, have a link, I'm sure there's some video of building demolition on there somewhere.
http://www.controlled-demolition.com
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-06-13 10:39:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Here is one of a hundred news stories conspiracy theoridiots can ignore:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13288953/
The fact is, you have to look at ALL the evidence not only the stuff that supports your wacky view.
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2006-06-13 10:26:52 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
The file name made it better.
Submitted by nephilim (user info) at 2006-06-13 10:17:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I wish I had the ability to lie to myself and pretend there was a conspiracey. Conspiracies are fun. Too bad i't be wrong to think that.
Submitted by hyprspacd (user info) at 2006-06-13 09:37:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
It did, it made me smile.
Especially the filename.
Submitted by BobLobla (user info) at 2006-06-13 09:22:31 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Ohh, you tried to trick me. This was your first post.
AUTO FIRST POST -2 MUTTA FUCKA
It was a good post though and the filename was fucking funny but I cant bring myself to +2 a first post...
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-06-13 07:36:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:42:01 (#)
Ranking: -2
Your arguement is more solid than the growing number of physicists who mathematically study and disagree with the official story, that's for sure.
--------------------
I am pretty sure this was a joke not meant as a serious scientific analysis of the event.
Williamson please don't try and add weight the the plausibility of a few nuts theories by throwing in "growing number".
Not a single professional engineering or physics group has supported anything that debunks or seriously threatens the official story.
I have yet to even see a single paper that has passed peer review that counters the official story.
Submitted by DCWoody (user info) at 2006-06-13 04:41:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
http://www.ubersite.com/m/85978
Absolute proof that it was not a controlled demolition.
Absolute. Inarguable. Well you could argue if you want, but you'd be wrong.
Submitted by AsshOly (user info) at 2006-06-13 00:50:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I laughed at this so +2.
As for the rest of you, get a grip. It's a giant mindfuck.
Submitted by Hookhand (user info) at 2006-06-13 00:50:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 because the name of the picture was "Jfk Jr flying school.jpg"
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2006-06-12 23:15:36 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
How they fell, the easy and simple way:
A plane crashed into the building, the building, being made out of steel and having a good FOUNDATION did not topple over to the sides like some retard would have you believe. The plane causes structural damage and the top part of the building is no longer supported; yet the walls keep it from slipping off. Thusly the tower starts to collapse, building momentum and mass with each floor, so when it goes past where the plane crashed it has enough kinetic energy to continue collapsing the way it was DESIGNED TO. It ain't that hard to understand.
Submitted by congo (user info) at 2006-06-12 23:14:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Ohhhhhhhhhh, it was the PLAAAAAAAAAAAAANES!
Submitted by MrSparkle847 (user info) at 2006-06-12 23:07:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by theadmiral (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:47:04 (#)
Ranking: -2
The planes hit the towers that is well known, what is not known is who was in charge of the planes and why the towers fell. Conservation of momentum and Conservation of energy (two of the most fundamental laws of physics) prove the towers would have fell slower then they did if the falling floors crushed and collapsed the lower floors. The only way it could have fell the speed it did was if the floors below if where already falling. Those are facts not opinion.
____________________
They aren't fact OR opinion; they're profound retardation. It's very simple why it fell. I believe it was explained by the article, and quite succinctly, I might add, but if you want some more info...
If you force a building to do shit it's not built to do, bad shit will happen to the building. Crashing a plane into a building is by far outside the scope of the building's practical use, and few, if any, buildings are actually built to sustain such an impact; the ONLY action for the building to take that would logically follow is that it would fall mightily.
Regarding your choice argument regarding physics, let's have a look at the basic definition momentum. Momentum is obviously critical to the law of conservation of momentum, and I won't bother with conservation of kinetic energy because it's so similar in spirit to the former law:
p = mv (m is mass, v is velocity)
Were you able to clock the speed of the floors as they fell? Can you tell me just how heavy each floor was? These two variables are critical to the conservation laws you mentioned, and if you don't have the variables or any method of deriving them from other numbers, you can't do any calculations. If you can't do calculations, you can't prove shit.
Well, actually, you did prove the most physics you've ever seen was the Newton's Law exhibit at your 6th grade science fair. And that you can retain a little bullshit as provided by "Loose Change."
Submitted by earth_collapse (user info) at 2006-06-12 23:03:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:41:47 (#)
Ranking: 2
P.S I just HAD to have another go at this one:
---------------------
Submitted by theadmiral (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:47:04 (#)
Ranking: -2
The planes hit the towers that is well known, what is not known is who was in charge of the planes and why the towers fell. Conservation of momentum and Conservation of energy (two of the most fundamental laws of physics) prove the towers would have fell slower then they did if the falling floors crushed and collapsed the lower floors. The only way it could have fell the speed it did was if the floors below if where already falling.
--------------------
WHAT... THE... FUCK...
Sorry, asshat, but I personally WATCHED the towers collapse on CNN (weird, cause it was, like, 2am here in NZ at the time, I dunno why I was awake, OR why I was watching CNN)... LIVE. There is NO FUCKING WAY that the lower floors were "already falling". It is VERY clear from the footage that the towers fell FROM THE TOP DOWN.
------------- ------ ----- --- -- - - - - - -
In a controlled demolition, the charges are detonated in sequential order beginning at the top of the building and then working it's way down until the last floor is pulled.
Whether or not I believe theadmiral's conspiracy theory, or any involving 9/11, is not the issue. What the issue is, is that many things were not entirely investigated in the WTC and 9/11 reports. Until I am supplied with factual and comprehensive information regarding the WTC buildings, I cannot believe anything.
Most likely there will always be a shroud of mystery, providing for every conspiracy theorist a wet dream.
Submitted by soccer (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:58:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:41:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
P.S I just HAD to have another go at this one:
---------------------
Submitted by theadmiral (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:47:04 (#)
Ranking: -2
The planes hit the towers that is well known, what is not known is who was in charge of the planes and why the towers fell. Conservation of momentum and Conservation of energy (two of the most fundamental laws of physics) prove the towers would have fell slower then they did if the falling floors crushed and collapsed the lower floors. The only way it could have fell the speed it did was if the floors below if where already falling.
--------------------
WHAT... THE... FUCK...
Sorry, asshat, but I personally WATCHED the towers collapse on CNN (weird, cause it was, like, 2am here in NZ at the time, I dunno why I was awake, OR why I was watching CNN)... LIVE. There is NO FUCKING WAY that the lower floors were "already falling". It is VERY clear from the footage that the towers fell FROM THE TOP DOWN.
Submitted by ih8u2man (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:34:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
old news.
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:33:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Submitted by resignator (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:21:54 (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:00:48 (#)
Ranking: 2
Errr... no building in the world has ever had fucking tonnes of jet fuel burning in it before (i.e something that burns hot enough to melt steel... durrr).
--------------------------------------------------------------
Just a couple of facts you might be interested in:
1. In perfect conditions the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons such as jet fuel burning in air is 1520° F (825° C).
2. No modern steel building in history has collapsed from fire except WTC 1,2, and 7.
3. WTC 7 did not get hit by a plane nor did it have jet fuel burning inside of it. It also was another steel frame building.
4. Molten steel was found in the basements WEEKS after 911.
--------------------------------
Wow, ANOTHER retard spouting "facts" that he got off the internet. Well done muppet. Thanks for proving my point that stupid people will believe just about anything without actually checking to see if there's anything to back it up.
I guess you missed the fact that there was a shitload of fuel stored in the basement of WTC 7 and that it collapsed a fairly short time after the fires in it reached the basement?
here, have a link to the REAL explaination for the tower collapses:
http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0515/news_1-1.html
REAL engineers with REAL understanding of structural physics. Not some fucking internet whack-jobs linking unrelated, bullshit "facts" and skewing them to fit their own personal agenda.
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2006-06-12 22:16:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
GREATEST ATTEMPT AT HUMOR EVER!!!!!!!!!
Submitted by Sinistral (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:43:25 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 for the joke
-1 for (Sticks out tongue and blows)
+1 for filename
Submitted by resignator (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:21:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:00:48 (#)
Ranking: 2
Errr... no building in the world has ever had fucking tonnes of jet fuel burning in it before (i.e something that burns hot enough to melt steel... durrr).
--------------------------------------------------------------
Just a couple of facts you might be interested in:
1. In perfect conditions the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons such as jet fuel burning in air is 1520° F (825° C).
2. No modern steel building in history has collapsed from fire except WTC 1,2, and 7.
3. WTC 7 did not get hit by a plane nor did it have jet fuel burning inside of it. It also was another steel frame building.
4. Molten steel was found in the basements WEEKS after 911.
Submitted by RyuFu (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:17:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Fuck you. Uhhh, no comment.
Submitted by dr_weazel (user info) at 2006-06-12 21:00:48 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by theadmiral (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:47:04 (#)
Ranking: -2
The planes hit the towers that is well known, what is not known is who was in charge of the planes and why the towers fell. Conservation of momentum and Conservation of energy (two of the most fundamental laws of physics) prove the towers would have fell slower then they did if the falling floors crushed and collapsed the lower floors. The only way it could have fell the speed it did was if the floors below if where already falling. Those are facts not opinion. The third tower to collapse did so in a fashion reminiscent of controlled demolition(opinion). Also no other steel framed tower in the world has collapsed due to fire(fact). Some buildings burnt for days leaving only a skeleton of a steel frame and did not collapse, yet this tower collapse due to almost no fire damage and no visible damage. Apparently that wasnt enough of a reason to examine the steel instead of quickly shipping it off to china for scrap.
-----
Errr... no building in the world has ever had fucking tonnes of jet fuel burning in it before (i.e something that burns hot enough to melt steel... durrr). All this conspiracy theory crap about it not being able to fall like it did is based on hearsay and bullshit internet rumours. Stop perpetuating the cycle, retard. No REAL experts have disputed the official explaination, only fucking crackpots who want to get their name in the news. And dont write "those are facts not opinion" when it's obviously fucking crap, you dumbshit, you have no proof to back that bullshit up, you just read it off some conspiracy nuts website and decided it was "fact".
P.S I hate G W Bush, I'm not a big fan of americans, and I also hate Osama Bin Buttfuckeed. So dont give me any "oh, you're just a conservative lap-dog" or whatever other bullshit you're gonna try and drop to "discredit" what I just said.
I have to say though, I liked this post. made me laugh. so +2
Submitted by Vengance (user info) at 2006-06-12 20:47:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
I can tell already you're gonna be a real winner.
Submitted by DoctorAsses (user info) at 2006-06-12 20:18:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
yep it was the jews alright
fuck u admiral
Submitted by theadmiral (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:47:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
The planes hit the towers that is well known, what is not known is who was in charge of the planes and why the towers fell. Conservation of momentum and Conservation of energy (two of the most fundamental laws of physics) prove the towers would have fell slower then they did if the falling floors crushed and collapsed the lower floors. The only way it could have fell the speed it did was if the floors below if where already falling. Those are facts not opinion. The third tower to collapse did so in a fashion reminiscent of controlled demolition(opinion). Also no other steel framed tower in the world has collapsed due to fire(fact). Some buildings burnt for days leaving only a skeleton of a steel frame and did not collapse, yet this tower collapse due to almost no fire damage and no visible damage. Apparently that wasnt enough of a reason to examine the steel instead of quickly shipping it off to china for scrap.
P.S. Those of you blaming it on jews quit being racist asshats
Submitted by williamson (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:42:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Your arguement is more solid than the growing number of physicists who mathematically study and disagree with the official story, that's for sure.
Submitted by ghola (user info) at 2006-06-12 19:10:04 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
yeah. i mean no.
yea i know you. yea.
Submitted by mockidol (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:50:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
And the ONLY reason I didn't negative you:
filename
Submitted by Ingsoc (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:49:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
No Comment
Submitted by nephilim (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:45:56 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
FUCK!!! I did spell my own name wrong...
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:44:09 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by mockidol (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:39:50 (#)
Ranking: 0
It looks like resignator is taking this bit serious.
I mean, it's obviously a joke.
But, uhh, not a good joke.
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:42:46 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
haha, you spelled your username wrong.
Submitted by Jeanneee (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:42:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
it's not HA HA RABBIT
Submitted by mockidol (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:39:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
It looks like resignator is taking this bit serious.
I mean, it's obviously a joke.
But, uhh, not a good joke.
Submitted by resignator (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:34:12 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
http://www.ubersite.com/m/89020
Submitted by nephilim (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:29:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I Knew It Was The JEWS!!!!
Fucking penny pinchers.
Submitted by skrapmetal (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:26:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: -1
(Sticks out tongue and blows)
------------
True dat.
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:25:21 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
http://www.jewsdidwtc.com/
Submitted by HighVoltage900 (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:25:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Okay it made me smile.
Submitted by Wiggles (user info) at 2006-06-12 18:24:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
JEWS DID WTC