Kids who call themselves Anarchists... (783 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 0.75 on 17 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Erik <pandasteak.at.shaw.ca> (View user info) at 2003-06-26 17:44:11 EDT
Anarchy is the basis for the anti-establishmentarian movement. Now it is a fad and a corporate logo. The fundamental basis for the anarchist movement is against everything it is now associated with. Corporations and mass profiterring on a political ideal. Would some body try this with Republicans or Democrats? Hell no! Anarchy appeals to the milk-fed, sheltered Hot-Topic shopping misguided children that shoot up our schools representing something they don't understand.
User Reviews
Submitted by Pacifist248 (user info) at 2003-07-01 17:46:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
It was started. It's called England.
Submitted by Hadooken (user info) at 2003-07-01 05:13:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I'm going to start a huge Monarchist movement.
Submitted by Quartermain (user info) at 2003-07-01 04:13:45 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Plus the ones who are all about the anarchy are these pale scrawny little goobers who, in reality, would be the first against the wall if anarchy did overtake their society.
Submitted by TheRef (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:53:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
an·ar·chy (nr-k)
n. pl. an·ar·chies
Absence of any form of political authority.
Political disorder and confusion.
Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose.
yep- this how i want to live. life with no purpose. no principles. no leadership. haven't you seen slc punk? you can't fight from the outside, you'll get nowhere. you must be on the inside to do the real damage. get out of your parents basement and go to law school. start being a productive member of society instead of wasting your days bitching.
p.s. i hate people who bitch and don't have a solution.
Submitted by Cymensen (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:53:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
"Now, anarchy, for it to work, it would take a great deal of effort. It would also take a lot of time. It would have to be global, because anything else would most likely be destroyed. In the Spanish Revolution, I believe a few thousand peasants were involved in anarchy. It only ended because the Spanish army pretty much destroyed them. It did actually work, but that was with a few thousand peasants."
In order for anarchy to work, there has to be order. Therefore, there is no anarchy. Anarchy can't "work." It's impossible; it will stabilize or it will destroy itself.
Submitted by Cymensen (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:47:50 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
YES! You hit the nail right on the head!
"Anarchists" are nothing more than full of shit. The contradict what they say and are complete morons. Seriously, one of these kids would say something like "I'm a Tolitarian Anarchist! Nazi's are bad! Communism rocks! Anarchy! Down with the system!"
Such hypocrits. Anyone who believes in Anarchy should be kicked in the face, and look up Anarchy in a dictionary. I've known what it meant since 4th grade (I played Civ II).
Submitted by Pacifist248 (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:24:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
It really depends on what you mean by kids. Their is possibly a 15 year old who understands. Now, anarchy, for it to work, it would take a great deal of effort. It would also take a lot of time. It would have to be global, because anything else would most likely be destroyed. In the Spanish Revolution, I believe a few thousand peasants were involved in anarchy. It only ended because the Spanish army pretty much destroyed them. It did actually work, but that was with a few thousand peasants. To convince the huge companies, to convice the leaders, it would take a great deal of time. Another Hitler type person might pop up during this global anarchy.
Submitted by Flapjacksupreme (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:23:22 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Very True Otter, I don't really like my Canadian Liberal Government, the guy whose been running the country for the last 8 to 12 years is leaving, and is going to be replaced by a thief. Sure, I've memorized a couple very nasty things out of my printed off Anarchist's Cookbook, but I value healthcare and fresh produce more than killing off some greedy frenchmen. I think the farthest I've ever went it removing the odd election billboard from someone's lawn. Rage Against the Machine is a great band, but as a somewhat fucked-up-in-the-head Joe Canadian, I'm too lazy to fight the power.
Submitted by Otter (user info) at 2003-07-01 03:03:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I hate those stupid kids who wear anarchy shirts. I don't think they truly understand what anarchy is all about. They'll say "It's anti-government," which in a sense is true, but it's more a lack of government. I laugh when they say that we need to get rid of our government. Things may not be that great with our government, but it is a whole hell of a lot better than the alternative.
I have seen anarchy in action. There's this little place on the Horn of Africa known as Somalia. This was anarchy.
If anarchy were declared in the US, the feces would seriously hit the ventalator.
Street gangs would take over their turf with a vengence. Vigilanties would pop every where. I also believe there would be on all out race war. The biggest problem with that is that even if you are the exact polar opposite of a Klan member, you would still be victimised because of the simple fact that you are white. Blacks would get killed no matter how much of an Uncle Tom they are.
After about a month, most motorised forms of transportation would become useless as there would be no fuel manufacture or transportation. Within a year or two, we'd be back in the stone age, not even having firearms to defend ourselves because the manufacture of ammunition would have been stopped.
The country would consist of grops of people who are just trying to survive, groups that will pilage the weak and the people who move from one place to anopther to avoid being involved with either of the first two groups.
This of course would be a senario if no other country decided to help us out. Sure, Somalia had a little bit of food, but that was soon pilaged by the clans, and they had weapons and ammo, but this was being brought in from outside sources.
Submitted by Istaros (user info) at 2003-06-26 19:21:43 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"Anarchy is the basis for the anti-establishmentarian movement."
Try again.
Submitted by glam_daddy (user info) at 2003-06-26 19:06:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
whats with you and the masks man?
you that ugly?
Submitted by nemo (user info) at 2003-06-26 19:03:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
"an organised effort to blow something up is not anarchy, it is an organised effort to blow something up."
hahahahahaha
Submitted by Little Jerry at 2003-06-26 18:59:17 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Anarchy...can't/wont...ever...exist. Proclaiming your self as an "Anachist" is oxymoronic.
Submitted by korthrun (user info) at 2003-06-26 18:44:28 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Anarchy cannot work. I laugh in the face of anarchy. I also enjoy the way 'anarchists' unite, in order to accomplish things in an organised manner. Good job. they may call these things 'anarchy', but an organised effort to blow something up is not anarchy, it is an organised effort to blow something up.
Submitted by El_Guapo (user info) at 2003-06-26 17:56:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
there's a lot of people in this world that "stand" for something they really don' t understand.
Submitted by Nator (user info) at 2003-06-26 17:54:33 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
No Comment
Submitted by streetpunk (user info) at 2003-06-26 17:47:57 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Fuck anarchy!! Give me royalty!!