Report me to the feds, and throw me in jail (793 hits)
Category: NoneRating: 0.15 on 45 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Sunny Gurm <sunnygurm.at.gmail.com> (View user info) at 2006-10-23 11:48:10 EDT
In reference to http://www.ubersite.com/m/94774
Now, Stabkill, I realize I do not have much seniority on Ubersite. But that won't stop me from calling you a little bitch, because thats all you are and ever will be for being a Narc.
Bush is like Hitler, he is making Americans give up freedoms for their own safety. So lets get one thing straight here, the USA is no longer a 'free' state. It is run by a power monger.
Also, freedom entails freedom of speech. This means anyone can say anything they want. It's funny how you deem it your duty to report someone who threatens to kill your ass hat of a president. Yet you nor your little patriotic friends object to groups like the KKK who talk about killing, maiming, or exhiling entire RACES. What is wrong with this picture?
But good job though. Seriously. If it weren't for you, pimply faced teenagers and loafers with too much time on their hands would just keep posting SERIOUS threats on websites! Well done Detective ass-clown, the U.S. of A is privelaged to have guys like you on the case! Stopping terrorism one uberer at a time.
Stabkill, sending emails to the state department from your mother's basement is not being a good citizen, it's called being pathetic.
So grow up, and get a life. Nobody cares about the president except you. So you can go ahead and call your little friends at the state department and make a difference. Because every threat against your leader should be taken seriously, and anyone who speaks against him should be locked up. After all, that's what democracy is based on! Oh wait...
User Reviews
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-24 11:13:44 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 16:32:51 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by ICO (user info) at 2006-10-23 15:53:26 (#)
Ranking: 0
I agree with indoninja, comparing Bush to Hitler is not only over the top, it's a completely different direction. Hitler was only interested in expanding territories and to do that he thought he had to kill off jews. This made WWII on the side of Ze Germans a very ideological war, which is very different from Bush's economical and corporational standpoint, with an alterior motive being to protect his people. Hitler was nót protecting his people, and he never let his people think this war was going to be a walk in the park. He might've been a total freaking lunatic leading people to their deaths, but he never said they weren't going to die
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
How in great fuck is Bush protecting his people??? The Military Commissions Act ALONE treads NOT ONLY on the very basic rights of every American Citizen, but puts EVERY MEMBER of the United States Army in grave danger if they are taken hostage overseas. The Geneva Conventions made sure all war prisoners would be treated with some amount of dignity, and if not, the perpetrators would be subject to punishment.
Bush shit all over that, though he claims to care and be appreciative of what these "patriotic" soldiers have accomplished.
And what of paying off popular media to MISreport the actual seriousness of global warming and the threat of increasing greenhouse gas emissions?? That not only threatens his people, but the ENTIRE FUCKING HUMAN RACE.
Not to mention Bush's plans for the Weaponization of Space.
Obviously there's numerous differences between Hitler and Bush. For fuck sakes - it's nearly 70 years later! Not to mention the terms/threats/reasons Bush offers for the steps taken to reach his objectives MUST be executed and labelled differently than Hitler. I think if you started using the terms spouted from Hitler's mouth there would be a public reaction (because of knowledge of history). Few would argue the holocaust was utmost tragedy.
So we fuck with the terminology a little - and now the expanding the territories is related more to obtaining oil-rich land to fuel the American nightmare. In this regard, please note - if there WAS an "alterior motive" to protect his people, he wouldn't be so hell-bent on oil; he'd be looking at a cleaner source of energy (IE solar)
Now the "communists" are "terrorists". 9/11 was Hitler's Reichstag fire.
The point is their STYLE of "governing", and the steps they have BOTH taken to gain such immense power are alarmingly similar. I cannot fathom how people fail to recognize this.
-----------------------------------
American soilders held overseas by Al-Queda would not be treated as if under the geneva convention already. The geneva convention convention arguably doesn't apply to any of the terrorist groups the military comissions act is geared towards (there are some exceptions, but in most case the only "right" they would be given is a summary execution).
Global warming is BS. And you will find the biggest opponents of the ONLY clean source powerful enough for our needs (nuclear) are'nt bush and his gang.
How are we obtaining oil rich land? Do you really think we are going to keep troops in Iraq forever? Do we get any oil out of them now?
Your constant comparison of the reichstag fire to 9/11 shows your ignorance. Hitler could have gotten the communist party outlawed without it. Even if he didn't they were becoming a very un-popular group and wouldn't have been a serious threat to his campaign to eventually get the enabling act passed.
Comparing their "governing" shows even more ignorance. When the enabling act was passed it gave hitler almost limitless power in the german govt and it was very popular ampong the german people, he was wildly popular among the german people. The military commissions act simply cements the position the US has ALREADY been taking with "enemy combatants" or "terrorists" or whatever label the Us is using on people not covered by the geneva convention. It doesn't give Bush limitless power, and it isn't as extreme as other things done by US presidents at times of war. Bush is still not popular, the nation isn't uniting behind him. His power hasn't really grown in the last month. the actions he has taken aren't extreme at all when compared when other presidents in a similiar situation.
That being said, I don't agree with him or it (military comission act), but whenever ignorant cunts like you get up on a soapbox and start accusing him of being hitler, or painting a picture where non-white people are picked up at random and shipped to camps I am forced to defend him from accusations because they are sop stupid and far from the truth.
Submitted by Poots (user info) at 2006-10-24 10:42:38 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
happended? what the fuck?
Submitted by Poots (user info) at 2006-10-24 10:35:49 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Ok I hope this works Mr man/woman I hope it does.
------
Tony,*shakes head*, what the fuck does a rigged terroist act that involved key members of the fbi and other high level extremely secure federal and state departments that ets can totally prove happened have to do with the economy or the rigged election that ets can prove happended or any other what ever the fucks you have to blather about? It does not make sense. Please enlighten me.
---
ETS, I was just kidding about the stuff up there. Please hate the joke not the joker.
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 18:50:53 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2006-10-23 18:46:40 (#)
Ranking: 0
...... the fact is i support him and the way he runs things. he didnt rig the election, he didnt have to. he won legitimately. and for those who cry about the economy and all that shit, please pipe down
----------------------------------------------------------
Who believes this BS?
HA HAHA - speculation about him rigging the election is SO BLATANT at this point, the MAINSTREAM is broadcasting it!!
Whoa.
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2006-10-23 18:46:40 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
ya know man, you guys can cry about bush all you want, but the fact is i support him and the way he runs things. he didnt rig the election, he didnt have to. he won legitimately. and for those who cry about the economy and all that shit, please pipe down.
its actually not to different a government from the one run by DEMOCRAT!!!!!! F.D.R. back when he was president. by which i mean a WARTIME GOVERNMENT!!! yes we, the united states of america were attacked by not a country but a way of life known as extremist islam, and the people that practice it. we then preoceded to declare war upon all terrorist organizations, focusing on Al Quieda more than others, and the countries who help them. (Insert Iraq here) yes that's right, a link between iraq and terrorism, unprecidented i know.
that's all
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 18:23:16 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2006-10-23 17:36:20 (#)
Ranking: -2
im not sure about this, but i dont think hitler got re-elected
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont think hitler had an electronic voting system either.....
Submitted by kaos-king (user info) at 2006-10-23 17:40:35 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Indoninja is on a government payroll to spread propoganda and disinformation. Either that or he's just brilliant.
Once I realized no sane, logical, functional human being could actually have all of the opinions that Indo has (with his level of education, especially!) , and that he's obviously some kind of "Super Alter," I just started to ignore him...
Sorry Indo. I don't believe you're sincere in a single word you say anymore. You're just a persona created to cause strife among those who are on the fence on a myriad of issues. You have proven your intelligence level to me on multiple occasions, but in doing so I can honestly say I have seen through your little facade. Every arguement you'll give to the contrary will only serve to hammer my point home.
Submitted by Tony_the_Tiger_is_a_Pedophile (user info) at 2006-10-23 17:36:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
im not sure about this, but i dont think hitler got re-elected
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2006-10-23 17:28:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:19:06 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja, in future don't use wikipedia to back up your arguments, i mean are you in grade 10 or something?
Hitler made his citizens live in fear, and had them give up their freedoms for protection.
If you knew history, you'd know.
-------
actually, indoninja is right on this point, and you're wrong. You must have forgotten the part about Hitler getting elected in 1933.
Submitted by ICO (user info) at 2006-10-23 16:48:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Treading on the rights of the citizens is done to weed out any evil bastards. The only other reason for that is to bé an evil bastard. The tactics are unethical, surely, but they cán help in killing off anyone that is dissident from his ways. And because his ways are those of combat, he tries to protect himself and his country by mongering among civilians for war, so they can keep any Biochemical- and/or Nuclear capable Bush-opponents at bay.
The most total way to secure protection for your country is to have all the other countries unable to do anything, and this is what he tries to do, regardless of how crappy it's all turning out. North Korea's next, and I almost think they're right in doing what they are; Building a nuclear war machine agáinst another nuclear war machine. As was demonstrated in the cold war, deterrence is also a very effective way to keep your countrymen unharmed (scared but not dead), especially when everyone is waving armies about like marbles.
Both N-Korea and the Bush administration go about their business sealing off their country from outside threats in totally different ways, both utterly utterly wrong.
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 16:32:51 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by ICO (user info) at 2006-10-23 15:53:26 (#)
Ranking: 0
I agree with indoninja, comparing Bush to Hitler is not only over the top, it's a completely different direction. Hitler was only interested in expanding territories and to do that he thought he had to kill off jews. This made WWII on the side of Ze Germans a very ideological war, which is very different from Bush's economical and corporational standpoint, with an alterior motive being to protect his people. Hitler was nót protecting his people, and he never let his people think this war was going to be a walk in the park. He might've been a total freaking lunatic leading people to their deaths, but he never said they weren't going to die
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
How in great fuck is Bush protecting his people??? The Military Commissions Act ALONE treads NOT ONLY on the very basic rights of every American Citizen, but puts EVERY MEMBER of the United States Army in grave danger if they are taken hostage overseas. The Geneva Conventions made sure all war prisoners would be treated with some amount of dignity, and if not, the perpetrators would be subject to punishment.
Bush shit all over that, though he claims to care and be appreciative of what these "patriotic" soldiers have accomplished.
And what of paying off popular media to MISreport the actual seriousness of global warming and the threat of increasing greenhouse gas emissions?? That not only threatens his people, but the ENTIRE FUCKING HUMAN RACE.
Not to mention Bush's plans for the Weaponization of Space.
Obviously there's numerous differences between Hitler and Bush. For fuck sakes - it's nearly 70 years later! Not to mention the terms/threats/reasons Bush offers for the steps taken to reach his objectives MUST be executed and labelled differently than Hitler. I think if you started using the terms spouted from Hitler's mouth there would be a public reaction (because of knowledge of history). Few would argue the holocaust was utmost tragedy.
So we fuck with the terminology a little - and now the expanding the territories is related more to obtaining oil-rich land to fuel the American nightmare. In this regard, please note - if there WAS an "alterior motive" to protect his people, he wouldn't be so hell-bent on oil; he'd be looking at a cleaner source of energy (IE solar)
Now the "communists" are "terrorists". 9/11 was Hitler's Reichstag fire.
The point is their STYLE of "governing", and the steps they have BOTH taken to gain such immense power are alarmingly similar. I cannot fathom how people fail to recognize this.
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2006-10-23 16:11:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Hitler.
Everybody compares somebody they don't like to Hitler.
"My boss is Hitler"
"My teacher is Hitler"
Get a new analogy.
I hate the guy, but Bush is NOTHING like Hitler.
Submitted by ICO (user info) at 2006-10-23 15:53:26 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
I agree with indoninja, comparing Bush to Hitler is not only over the top, it's a completely different direction. Hitler was only interested in expanding territories and to do that he thought he had to kill off jews. This made WWII on the side of Ze Germans a very ideological war, which is very different from Bush's economical and corporational standpoint, with an alterior motive being to protect his people. Hitler was nót protecting his people, and he never let his people think this war was going to be a walk in the park. He might've been a total freaking lunatic leading people to their deaths, but he never said they weren't going to die.
Submitted by shitfuck (user info) at 2006-10-23 15:43:59 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I'm just happy I'm not living this life as a missle.
Submitted by Speckles (user info) at 2006-10-23 14:29:18 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Also, freedom entails freedom of speech. This means anyone can say anything they want...groups like the KKK who talk about killing, maiming, or exhiling entire RACES.
-------------------------------
Freedom of speech does not allow the threatening of an individual. If the KKK decided to put out a press release saying "our new goal is to kill all dem coons", they would face legal consequences. Unless they are talking about racoons, which will require a vermin extermination liscense. Those racoon killing bastards.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 14:11:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:14:07 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:08:14 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja ... most of these kiddies didn't know of the more fearsome threat of global nuclear war their democrat leaders placed on us.
How would you dumbass kiddie morons liked to have lived with constant reminders of being incinerated after running around scared shitless for 30 minutes before the bombs starting lighting up the sky?
Thanks for starting that, JFK.
---------------------------------------------
And you don't think the Republicans have put us in the EXACT same position? Time to wake up, Dorothy.
------------------------------------
Exact same position?
I am pretty sure none of America's "enemies" have access to ICBM's with nuclear warheads.
Regan got us off the hook on that one.
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:51:55 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:11:34 (#)
Ranking: -2
A comparison between Bush and Hitler is quite simply dumb. Which makes you dumb. Hooray.
______________
Agreed. For one, Bush is a dipshit of an orator.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:43:05 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:24:32 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:03:23 (#)
Ranking: 0
Why don't you actually threaten George W. Bush on the internet with detailed plans of how you intend to kill him? You are a coward that just says "George Bush sucks" which we've all heard a million times as is mostly true in many things he does.
------------------------------------------------------
If George Bush gets killed, would there be more remorse or celebration in America?
You yourself say he does a lot of things that suck, so why the hell do you care if someone threatens to kill him?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't mean to be mean... But WAKE THE FUCK UP! If Bush is killed, Cheney is President!!!! Now... Who do you think is worse: GW Bush, or Dick Cheney? I think I believe the answer is crystal clear.
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:24:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:03:23 (#)
Ranking: 0
Why don't you actually threaten George W. Bush on the internet with detailed plans of how you intend to kill him? You are a coward that just says "George Bush sucks" which we've all heard a million times as is mostly true in many things he does.
------------------------------------------------------
If George Bush gets killed, would there be more remorse or celebration in America?
You yourself say he does a lot of things that suck, so why the hell do you care if someone threatens to kill him?
Submitted by CaptainThorns (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:16:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Don't know what's going on, and I don't really care...
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:14:07 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:08:14 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja ... most of these kiddies didn't know of the more fearsome threat of global nuclear war their democrat leaders placed on us.
How would you dumbass kiddie morons liked to have lived with constant reminders of being incinerated after running around scared shitless for 30 minutes before the bombs starting lighting up the sky?
Thanks for starting that, JFK.
---------------------------------------------
And you don't think the Republicans have put us in the EXACT same position? Time to wake up, Dorothy.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:08:14 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja ... most of these kiddies didn't know of the more fearsome threat of global nuclear war their democrat leaders placed on us.
How would you dumbass kiddie morons liked to have lived with constant reminders of being incinerated after running around scared shitless for 30 minutes before the bombs starting lighting up the sky?
Thanks for starting that, JFK.
Submitted by Stabkill (user info) at 2006-10-23 13:03:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Cry now, cry later when Shitfuck is thrown in the slam. It is all good from my point of view. As I said, I'm not on any no-fly list myself and I haven't ruined any vacations with internet threats.
Why don't you actually threaten George W. Bush on the internet with detailed plans of how you intend to kill him? You are a coward that just says "George Bush sucks" which we've all heard a million times as is mostly true in many things he does.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:57:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:42:02 (#)
Ranking: 0
Thank you, SunnyG.
And Indo - you miserable twat - Hitler's use of the Reichstag Fire is a perfect example of how he used the "fear" tactic (ie modern day "terrorism" ) to scare citizens into submission. Thanks, though. You're effort is commendable
--------------------------------------------
The Reichstag Fire didn't allow him to scare anyone into submission. It made it easier for him to ban the communist party (which probably would have happened before the March elections anyway, Hitler had done a good job of painting the communists as traitors, and even if it didn't happen they were still not that popular after the Nazi smear job).
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:52:32 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:30:00 (#)
Ranking: -2
I do no history, Hitler didn't protect people, they didn't give up freedom for protection.
---------------------------------
I don't no spelling.
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:49:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:30:00 (#)
Ranking: -2
"I do no history..."
-----------------------------------------
To the same extent you know grammer?
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:42:02 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:19:06 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja, in future don't use wikipedia to back up your arguments, i mean are you in grade 10 or something?
Hitler made his citizens live in fear, and had them give up their freedoms for protection.
If you knew history, you'd know.
-------------------------------------
Thank you, SunnyG.
And Indo - you miserable twat - Hitler's use of the Reichstag Fire is a perfect example of how he used the "fear" tactic (ie modern day "terrorism" ) to scare citizens into submission. Thanks, though. You're effort is commendable
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:30:00 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:19:06 (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja, in future don't use wikipedia to back up your arguments, i mean are you in grade 10 or something?
Hitler made his citizens live in fear, and had them give up their freedoms for protection.
If you knew history, you'd know.
-------------------------------
I wouldn't rely on it if I was doing real research but for a quick reliable historical link it works.
I do no history, Hitler didn't protect people, they didn't give up freedom for protection. They gave up freedom becuase their economy sucked they felt like losers after WWI and the versallies treaty, and he gave them hope. He made them feel like they were great and deserved the best in life and that the only reason they didn't get it was because the Jews and the communists betrayed them.
Hitler didn't base his speeches around being streong for protection, he based them around being strong so they could take back what they wanted, so they could have lebensraum, so they would be ready for "drach noch osten" (push to the east, spelling is probably off).
This is nothing like the US.
If your head wasn't up your ass you would know. My freedom is no different now then it was 10 years ago, but that is another debate. Bush is getting laws passed and policy changed on the fear of terrorists, not on the claim that the US has a right to Iraq oil, not that we were betrayed by people in our own country and that is why we are in bad shape.
Submitted by loki (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:25:37 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Seriously, if there was an actual threat against W, one that someone had even the most remote chance of acting on - then fine call mommy and daddy, but ratting someone out just because you're a dick is uncalled for.
Think of it this way. If say Ax or someone wrote something about blowing up his school and we knew that it was a joke or him just blowing off steam about his computer teacher touching his kibbles and bits then I wouldn't feel any need to inform anyone. If, however, he seemed like he was really going to shoot up the school it would be a different story.
I don't know where I was going with that except that I'm pretty sure W is in as much danger as Ax's school..
Submitted by EchoBoxing (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:22:08 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
wow. you are a fucking retard.
Submitted by SunnyG (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:19:06 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
indoninja, in future don't use wikipedia to back up your arguments, i mean are you in grade 10 or something?
Hitler made his citizens live in fear, and had them give up their freedoms for protection.
If you knew history, you'd know.
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:15:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:03:58 (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:01:01 (#)
Ranking: -2
Hitler made people give up freedoms for their own safety? who exactly was he making them safe from?
------------------------------------------------------------------
It's confirmed - you're officially fucking retarded.
Familiarize yourself with Nazi propaghanda, shitstick.
-----------------------------------------------------------
You really are an ignorant cunt aren't you?
Germans needing and deserving "Lebensraum" was protecting the german people?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi#Key_elements_of_the_Nazi_ideology
Don't see any points there about keeping people safe.
Nazi propaganda was based around blaming the Jews and the communists for losing WWII and that they deserved more than any of the surrounding countries. It wasn't about fear or keeping people safe it was about german pride and superiority.
Submitted by UnderOathMeal (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:14:19 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
+2 for this:
"Stabkill, sending emails to the state department from your mother's basement is not being a good citizen, it's called being pathetic."
Whether SK does this or not, I laughed.
Submitted by domenad (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:11:34 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
A comparison between Bush and Hitler is quite simply dumb. Which makes you dumb. Hooray.
Submitted by Cadrach (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:06:54 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Stabby's a narc, but you're an idiot.
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:06:47 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
I don't know who this buttwipe is, but I agree with him/her 100%.
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:03:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:01:01 (#)
Ranking: -2
Bush is like Hitler, he is making Americans give up freedoms for their own safety. So lets get one thing straight here, the USA is no longer a 'free' state. It is run by a power monger.
---------------------------
Hitler made people give up freedoms for their own safety? who exactly was he making them safe from?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's confirmed - you're officially fucking retarded.
Familiarize yourself with Nazi propaghanda, shitstick.
Submitted by marginwalker (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:02:23 EDT (#)
Ranking: 1
Ha!
This whole thing is becoming a bit tiresome though...
Submitted by indoninja (user info) at 2006-10-23 12:01:01 EDT (#)
Ranking: -2
Bush is like Hitler, he is making Americans give up freedoms for their own safety. So lets get one thing straight here, the USA is no longer a 'free' state. It is run by a power monger.
---------------------------
Hitler made people give up freedoms for their own safety? who exactly was he making them safe from?
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:59:30 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
YES!
Submitted by Adamdidit2u (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:57:39 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
No Comment
Submitted by electrictoothsyndrome (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:55:15 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Stabkill is a fucking moron. He gives Republicans a bad name.
Submitted by BranDo (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:51:10 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Seniority or not, funny as cancer!!
Submitted by Beano312003 (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:50:13 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
SHITFUCK DID NOT THREATEN TO KILL ANYONE.
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2006-10-23 11:49:58 EDT (#)
Ranking: 0
if you don't like it then get the fuck out