Forced darwinism. (1511 hits)
Category: HumorRating: 0.35 on 82 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by ilikesteak (View user info) at 2006-12-02 09:56:18 EST
Our planet is being overrun by people. Resources are being run dry. Global warming is happening and we can't do anything about it, because it's too easy to continue what we're doing and just waiting for the next generation to deal with it. Our population is out of controll and we are almost beyond hope of preserving our planet to continue the propagation of the human race.
Human population as of 2005
#1 Asia - (3,879,000,000)
#2 Africa - (877,500,000)
#3 Europe - (727,000,000)
#4 North America - (501,500,000)
#5 South America - (379,500,000)
#6 Australia/Oceania - (32,000,000)
6,550,000,000 people as of Nov. 2006
I know that our current systems of government are failing miserably, and we aren't doing anything about it.
I call for population control. My method of forced darwinism.
Mandatory sterilisation of those with mental illnesses.
Execution for those with mental illnesses will come later, but sterilisation seems less radical and will be accepted far before execution, so it's sterilisation firts to keep them from spreading in the meantime.
Mandatory abortion of children of minors.
Minors can't raise children, let alone support them, so it's mandatory abortion. Any person who shall refuse shall be executed.
Mandatory euthanasia at 70. People are living longer and needing more support, and they take more from the system than they've put in.
Mandatory execution of the homeless. These people clearly cannot function well enough or support themselves.
The population of any countries led by a dictator or communism shall be eliminated.
One child per couple. Ay other children shall be aborted, and if the abortion is refused, there shall be immediate execution of the family.
There shall be a breeding license.
There shall be immediate execution of criminals who have committed a serious offence. The rehabilitation method clearly does not work, so execution is the best answer in these situations.
There far more methods that I approve of, and should be implemented, but listing them all takes time, and I got bored.
User Reviews
Submitted by FartSmeller (user info) at 2006-12-05 13:45:07 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Excuse me, Asia? STOP BREEDING.
Submitted by Hobocore (user info) at 2006-12-05 08:42:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
You are exactly the type of person I would like to rule the world.
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-05 02:42:55 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
The book is titled Mein Kampf, you fuckwit. And the Hitler comparison has only been brought up about 2 thousand times.
Submitted by cigarettefun (user info) at 2006-12-05 02:07:34 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I'm a bit upset I wasted my time reading this. It's written poorly and Eugenics, Infanticide, and other forms of murder with pretty names are not good options. (I am pro-choice though) Don't worry though. The universe will balance everything (asteroids). By the way. The carrying capacity of earth for humans is estimated to level off by 2050 with a population somewhere between 9-10 billion if everything were to stay the same. By that point, though, I'm sure some sort of famine due to pests (that, according to darwin's theory of evolution, will become immune to pesticides) will destroy crop after crop of some unlucky country's agriculture. Maybe you should do a bit of research, unless your purpose for this was to inspire hatred for those that are weaker than yourself. You'd probably like the book Mein Kompf, its in German, so you'll have to get it translated into english...the author shares similar views as you in order to inspire loyalty by fear mongering. His name was Hitler, Adolf.
Submitted by sketch9 (user info) at 2006-12-04 21:31:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
this has been done... its called eugenics.
and forcing anything has nothing to do with darwinism
Submitted by Anansie (user info) at 2006-12-04 21:13:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Aren't the words "forced" and "darwinism" contradictory? I may be wrong.
I pretty much disagree with most of these. We are actually in the middle of a mass extinction, so I'm pretty sure the situation will take care of itself.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-04 19:29:04 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
gank, modern society has already evolved into a situation where the evolutionary basis for genetics is quickly becoming inexistant, or radically altered.
why not create a child best for humanity rather than on a natural basis, for modern society is far from a natural society, contrary to what Aristotle states.
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-04 19:01:59 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
What you aren't seeming to understand is, that my plan shall eliminate the unwanted offspring, and keep the stronger offspring, potentially allowing them to breed later. Your plan involves a lot more kids, and it allows for more problems. More people leads to the faster reduction of resources, and more possible people greatly decreases the ratio of positive above average results to the sub standard results.
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-12-04 18:56:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Unless you are merely talking about "fixing" genes that are known to cause heart disease or Alzheimer's or the like. Then it can't be bad, but you would benefit even more from a larger sampling of children.
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-12-04 18:53:20 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Even still, though manipulating genes to ensure certain genetic factors might eliminate the need to breed large amounts of children, it also might eliminate the possibility of as-yet-unknown beneficial genetic mutations or combinations.
In other words, it seems counterproductive to Darwinism to regulate what you think is genetically beneficial and then manipulate in that regard. You are at the point rigging the system to get results you want, not necessarily results that would evolve naturally.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-04 18:33:45 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:50:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
bob,
You have an excellent point about contraception in this context. And IF you could just manipulate genes like in Gattaca, then that would solve the fitness test. But it's hard to say if that will ever be possible.
__________________
I think that we will be able to learn the genes for the majority of issues, especially physical, in the short future.
The question is to whether we can ever create a system to manipulate those specific genes, the Nobel prize for chemistry this year, a fellow named Craig Mello, won it for this ability, but it can only be used in very limited circumstances on adults.
Submitted by sicosemen (user info) at 2006-12-04 18:24:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
I want more than one kid, a boy and a girl so I will know how to properly sexually assault them both.
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:50:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
bob,
You have an excellent point about contraception in this context. And IF you could just manipulate genes like in Gattaca, then that would solve the fitness test. But it's hard to say if that will ever be possible.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:39:22 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
in gattaca, they actually manipulated the genes before birth so it wasnt necessary to breed large amounts of children. they cheated on the survival test.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:36:12 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
all forms of contraception is unnatural selection.
however, humans have the reason to dictate contraception.
Submitted by jfreakman (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:31:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
What you really want is for EVERYONE to have as many kids as possible, and then for those kids to be tested by natural selection. It would be like an obstacle course, except you win or lose the right to continue living. Of course, it would be difficult to determine what to define as "genetic fitness", but a certain measure of IQ, physical attributes, and not having high rates of possible disease (based on genes and family history) would be a great start.
_____________________________
Hello, Gattaca.
Submitted by gank (user info) at 2006-12-04 16:27:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
While I do agree that humans are NOT currently evolving, most of your methods are counter-productive. Forced Darwinism would just mean that we ENFORCE natural selection on human beings. Currently we do not.
Abortion is UNNATURAL SELECTION. At least let the kid grow up and prove that he's a dipshit before you get rid of him. What does it matter if the kid's parents are young or economically broke or retarded or have already had one kid? The kid might still turn out to be a genius, or have some slight positive genetic mutation that would advance human evolution.
What you really want is for EVERYONE to have as many kids as possible, and then for those kids to be tested by natural selection. It would be like an obstacle course, except you win or lose the right to continue living. Of course, it would be difficult to determine what to define as "genetic fitness", but a certain measure of IQ, physical attributes, and not having high rates of possible disease (based on genes and family history) would be a great start.
Killed after 70? That's fucking stupid. Let them die NATURALLY maybe. Stop doing costly surgeries and pumping people full of prescriptions just for 2-5 more years of poor health, maybe. But you can't just kill them. They may still be able to contribute to society, without being a medical burden, for long after 70. In other words, if an old lion can still fight & fuck, then he is still "fit".
Also, though my "genetic fitness" method above would solve your over-population problem... FUCK that over-population myth. The world IS NOT currently over-populated.
Of course, you might just be joking. AND in any case, I don't really believe most of the above either, I'm just saying that it would be more consistent with forced darwinism.
Submitted by TheSpook (user info) at 2006-12-04 07:56:59 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Somebody needs to stop those Aisians.
They're like a giant fucking antfarm.
Submitted by Orgasmatron (user info) at 2006-12-03 23:08:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
There shall be a breeding license.
---
I've been a fan of this idea for quite some time now.
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-03 22:13:09 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I realised why Bubba is so pissed off. He feels personally threatened by this idea, that he will be the first up against the wall when it comes. I mean, the man is the closest one here to the "take out" age, and probably knows quite a few deadbeats and lifers. Sorry for scaring you, pal. Get off the computer and change your diapers, we promise not to change anything behind your back.
Submitted by LongestPants (user info) at 2006-12-03 18:18:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:02:05 (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by LongestPants (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:47:32 (#)
Ranking: -2
Have you ever heard of a man named Hitler?
---
'Glib' is such a difficult thing to pull off. You failed rather miserably with this rhetorical nonsense.
---
Kidding. I was kidding.
Geez.
Submitted by PommyTom (user info) at 2006-12-03 18:06:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Careful. You're starting to sound like Right-Wing Jack.
Nature will set things right. It always does.
It's just a matter of time before a little virus comes along that will make AIDS seem like a head cold.
--------------
You're absolutely right. It won't be long now.
Give it another 5-10 years for a more effective treatment of AIDS, not a cure merely a 'suppressant'.
Give it a further 5 years for the western world to be saturated with the new drug and for cheaper availibility in third world nations.
Give it 2-3 years, for many users in third world nations beginning the compartively expensive drug treatment, only to stop the minute they feel marginally better and sell the remainder of the treatment drugs on the programme for food.
AIDS then mutates, either becoming resistant to those drugs or more likely further mutating into an air borne virus.
Voila, the end of the human race. This is exactly what is happening with TB, just wait till it happens with AIDs and kiss your white picket fence goodbye.
Submitted by firefly (user info) at 2006-12-03 18:02:00 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
This is very cruel.
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2006-12-03 17:02:36 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-03 14:54:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by DCWoody (user info) at 2006-12-03 14:23:18 (#)
Ranking: 0
I have found the reviews on this post both interesting and dissapointing. Why can I never find any intelligent would be revolutionaries. You are all very very stupid. Yes 'all' includes you. Idiot.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since you seem to know exactly what needs to be done, please, fill us stupid people in and post it.
Submitted by DCWoody (user info) at 2006-12-03 14:23:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I have found the reviews on this post both interesting and dissapointing. Why can I never find any intelligent would be revolutionaries. You are all very very stupid. Yes 'all' includes you. Idiot.
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-03 13:39:56 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Fungah (user info) at 2006-12-03 13:03:49 (#)
Ranking: 0
You forgot to include the most important part of any kind of forced darwinism.
Penguins with jetpacks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Those birds really do need to start flying.
Submitted by Fungah (user info) at 2006-12-03 13:03:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
You forgot to include the most important part of any kind of forced darwinism.
Penguins with jetpacks.
Submitted by LittleMonster (user info) at 2006-12-03 12:54:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
agreed with some, yet not all.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-03 12:32:44 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
I call for population control. My method of forced darwinism.
*******
What YOU call for is of no importance. You can't even understand the need
to use a capital letter at the beginning of a man's name or a proper noun.
You really should stop.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-03 12:19:55 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-03 01:42:24 (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-03 01:02:52 (#)
Ranking: 2
What's with all the "OMG U R HITLER!!!!" comments? I think Hitler actually had the right idea, but the wrong targets. I'm personally tired of the "let's embrace everyone" bullshit. I blame liberals. Some people are just plain trash, and their existence is a huge fucking negative externality on the human race. They need to be removed from the equation.
For starters, we need to cut down on a lot of the welfare. Only people who have proven willing to work should be supported, to give them the time to find a job. Those who have proven unwilling or unable to be productive should be left to rot. Society has no reason to give to those who do not give anything in return.
---
You will be getting a cabinet position.
*********
Said position will be bent over, grabbing your ankles, and squealing....
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-03 12:01:54 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
http://www.ubersite.com/m/96452
Submitted by redskieslookfake (user info) at 2006-12-03 08:19:12 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
mmm heat whorey
Submitted by FunnyAsCancer (user info) at 2006-12-03 06:20:14 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Of course, this is a good idea on paper, but...
1) I'd like to see how you react when you hit 70. I don't think they'll make exceptions for euthenasia just for you.
2) If you make it so that each couple can only have 1 kid, you'll effectively halve the population within a couple generations' time. Actually it'll probably be even lower than half, because not everyone ends up in a child-bearing relationship. In any case, with such a rapid population loss, those remaining will suffer tremendously, as they now live in a world without enough people to operate all the machinery/systems we use on an everyday basis.
Submitted by lungfish (user info) at 2006-12-03 04:03:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I am disappointed.
Needs more Yardbirds.
Submitted by EdaphonE (user info) at 2006-12-03 02:16:43 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
how can one have "Mandatory euthanasia".
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-03 01:42:24 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-03 01:02:52 (#)
Ranking: 2
What's with all the "OMG U R HITLER!!!!" comments? I think Hitler actually had the right idea, but the wrong targets. I'm personally tired of the "let's embrace everyone" bullshit. I blame liberals. Some people are just plain trash, and their existence is a huge fucking negative externality on the human race. They need to be removed from the equation.
For starters, we need to cut down on a lot of the welfare. Only people who have proven willing to work should be supported, to give them the time to find a job. Those who have proven unwilling or unable to be productive should be left to rot. Society has no reason to give to those who do not give anything in return.
---
You will be getting a cabinet position.
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-03 01:02:52 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
What's with all the "OMG U R HITLER!!!!" comments? I think Hitler actually had the right idea, but the wrong targets. I'm personally tired of the "let's embrace everyone" bullshit. I blame liberals. Some people are just plain trash, and their existence is a huge fucking negative externality on the human race. They need to be removed from the equation.
For starters, we need to cut down on a lot of the welfare. Only people who have proven willing to work should be supported, to give them the time to find a job. Those who have proven unwilling or unable to be productive should be left to rot. Society has no reason to give to those who do not give anything in return.
Submitted by coley (user info) at 2006-12-03 00:39:35 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
I agree with the breeding licenses; the rest is crap.
:D
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-03 00:09:38 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:42:48 (#)
Ranking: 2
---
Mandatory sterilization of those with mental illnesses.
Execution for those with mental illnesses will come later, but sterilization seems less radical and will be accepted far before execution, so it's sterilization first to keep them from spreading in the meantime.
---
I think this is a little off the mark. While our tolerance of Mental illness remains absurdly high, there are many wonderful people out there who are highly independent, useful contributors to our patchwork society and typically don't find themselves breeding.
The focus shouldn't be on their steriliization or execution - it should be on their parents.
We need to be far more proactive in isolating the genes that cause these illnesses and truly enforce some sort of Child Reproduction License program that aggressively regulates the sort of offspring that we as a society are creating. IF you chose to let GOD (or whatever higher power that individual has extraneously embraced to offer some sort of spiritual validation) dictate the your match up it must be proven that you can afford the massive finacial burden of this child.
As a society we need to respect free will, but at the same time we need protect the general wellness, prosperity and general effectiveness of our population.
---
Sterilisation does not end the life of the person with the mental illness. They can be useful, but normal humans perform even the simplest tasks far more effectively and efficiently.
Part of the test for the breeding license is if you had one executed or aborted, why, and in the case of mental illness, you will be sterilised to further halt the spread of the illness. Another part of the license is if either of you have any history for mental illnesses or bad genetics.
Those with mental illnesses still have fully working reproductive organs, and can breed. This shall be stopped.
---
Mandatory execution of the homeless. These people clearly cannot function well enough or support themselves.
---
Disagree.
Homelessness is a failing of society. There should be no homeless. Massive work farms should be in place and vagrancy should be aggressively monitored. If you are without a home, one will be provided to you but you must work. If you refuse to work you will be incarcerated and FORCED to work.
Work Farm duties would include:
- sanitation of city streets
- recycling
- maintenance of 'green space'
---
Homelessness is an individual failing. If they got a steady job, they could afford a more permanent dwelling. They contribute nothing, and are abusing a system set in place to provide temporary relief. I know steady jobs are not easy to obtain, but places offering minimum wage are always hiring. There shall also be cost effective housing, affordable by all with jobs. Governmental jobs will always be created as governmental activities increase.
---
The population of any countries led by a dictator or communism shall be eliminated.
---
That is just silly, and lazy. Those people are fully functional and deserve a better choice.
Massive education needs to happen across the board, ignorance should not be an excuse for anything. Communist nations exist because our established economic practices fail to accommodate the "poorer" nations. Exploitation is all these financially degenerate countries have to look forward to in our current globalized bullshit. We need to change that.
---
This is meant to keep people from questioning me. I can't properly run the world if I'm always looking over my shoulder for someone hoping to be my replacement. It is also meant to end any possibility of those failing systems to continue.
---
One child per couple. Any other children shall be aborted, and if the abortion is refused, there shall be immediate execution of the family.
---
I agree, there should be a limit of 1. We have established it is our "right" so should never be taken away.
BUT People should be able to have more. This privilege should be extended to those couples that have the financial capacity to fully support more than one child.
Abortion should always be an option but there are waiting lists for people to fill their "1 child" quota.
You can financially profit from the creation of life, but you must be a registered and highly regulated. But lets face it, there are some genetically superior folks out there. We should encourage them to breed.
---
There are ways around the one child per couple. It must be pre arranged at least one year before the initial stage of pregnancy is reached, and a rigorous testing stage shall begin. The person recieving a child must be able to support it and raise it properly. Classes on parenting must be taken for added measure.
---
There shall be immediate execution of criminals who have committed a serious offence. The rehabilitation method clearly does not work, so execution is the best answer in these situations.
---
People who are found guilty of Pedophilia should be put to Death. By public execution. These repulsive degenerate fuckers deserve no mercy and we need to expunge them from humanity.
If you take the life of another human being willfully and without justification (cuz lets face it, some folks deserve to die) then you should be subject to death yourself.
Sometimes execution is the best answer in these situation and that option should ALWAYS be there.
ALSO - I propose an initiative that will see the massive creation of recycling facilities adjoined to all of the prisons and penitentiaries on the planet. We need to put our criminals to hard work, and what better way to repay their debt to society than to participate in an unprecedented colossal recycling program.
One of these days I will write a post on that...
---
I considered keeping them alive if not for slavery purposes, but escape is far too likely. While I do believe that rehabilitation of criminals is possible, when done as it should to work, it is currently not an economically sound idea. People cannot fully repay their debts to society in prision.
Submitted by pen_name (user info) at 2006-12-02 20:46:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
One part "Logan's run," one part "Demolition man," one part "Judge Dredd," one part "Gattica," one part "1984," and one part idiot. What a nifty mélange.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 19:57:10 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
if stem cells are alive, i wan to adopt them as a tax write off.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 19:50:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I tried to sell my stem one time, but all I got was arrested...
:(
Submitted by DCWoody (user info) at 2006-12-02 19:49:53 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Wow, I've actualy found someone who less prefereable than Bush for potus
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 19:33:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:59:41 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:29:06 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:06:02 (#)
Ranking: -2
Who the fuck died and made you God? Your concept of how the world should work is no more valid than that of anyone else. If you believe it is, prove it.
__________________
Someone has to claim the God role. Normally its just the one in power, which in and of itself is a bad way to create it in a democratic government because the tyranny of the majority is not just.
**************
My opinion: I hate control freaks. It is not your job (nor anyone's) to tell me or others how to act or live. We have thousands of laws on the books, many of which derive from the old "I don't do that, so no one else should be allowed either."
If a 16 year-old wants to have a baby, it isn't your business.
Certain laws are there for the protection of all, such as speed limits and laws against murder and rape.
__________________
For the vast majority of things, I would agree with you Bubba. But there are some issues that the majority just doesnt fucking understand and therefore cannot make an informed choice on. It is in this situation that one has to take control.
The anti-Bush with stem cell research would be a good example.
Submitted by Doodles (user info) at 2006-12-02 19:06:30 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2006-12-02 11:27:02 (#)
Ranking: 1
Kill all stalkers, zit boys, minorities, retards, Trailer Trash, unemployed, fags and that's just for starters.
---
So 99.999999% of Ubersite?
What the world needs is a nuclear fallout, and a few million years to fix itself, I support that happening the day after i'm buried.
Get with the weapons bitches.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:59:41 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:29:06 (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:06:02 (#)
Ranking: -2
Who the fuck died and made you God? Your concept of how the world should work is no more valid than that of anyone else. If you believe it is, prove it.
__________________
Someone has to claim the God role. Normally its just the one in power, which in and of itself is a bad way to create it in a democratic government because the tyranny of the majority is not just.
**************
My opinion: I hate control freaks. It is not your job (nor anyone's) to tell me or others how to act or live. We have thousands of laws on the books, many of which derive from the old "I don't do that, so no one else should be allowed either."
If a 16 year-old wants to have a baby, it isn't your business.
Certain laws are there for the protection of all, such as speed limits and laws against murder and rape.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:29:06 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:06:02 (#)
Ranking: -2
Who the fuck died and made you God? Your concept of how the world should work is no more valid than that of anyone else. If you believe it is, prove it.
__________________
Someone has to claim the God role. Normally its just the one in power, which in and of itself is a bad way to create it in a democratic government because the tyranny of the majority is not just.
Submitted by BLITZKREIG_BOB (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:10:44 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
These problems tend to self-correct. Just give it time.
Submitted by Bubba2341 (user info) at 2006-12-02 18:06:02 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Who the fuck died and made you God? Your concept of how the world should work is no more valid than that of anyone else. If you believe it is, prove it.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 17:49:45 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Maltese (user info) at 2006-12-02 17:20:27 (#)
Ranking: 0
Mandatory abortion of children of minors.
Minors can't raise children, let alone support them, so it's mandatory abortion. Any person who shall refuse shall be executed.
===
Oh, and fuck your pasty white ass for that comment as well. I can raise my kid just as well as anyone else.
---
No you can't.
This is not to say you will not do a great job - just that there are other people out there who would be able to raise your kid better than you. More money, more compassion, more time, more resources... those people exist and would do a better job.
You might be an exception to the general rule, but even still the point remains that we need to start drawing the line someplace.
18 is a good place to make that stand.
Would you not make the argument that you would be in a better position to raise your kid if you were over the age of 18?
If not, I would suggest you are completely full of shit.
Submitted by Maltese (user info) at 2006-12-02 17:20:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Mandatory abortion of children of minors.
Minors can't raise children, let alone support them, so it's mandatory abortion. Any person who shall refuse shall be executed.
===
Oh, and fuck your pasty white ass for that comment as well. I can raise my kid just as well as anyone else.
Submitted by Maltese (user info) at 2006-12-02 17:19:29 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Actually, the Earth can safely accomodate up to 200 billion people. So fuck you right up the ass.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 17:10:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Spooner (user info) at 2006-12-02 16:57:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
Because human rights are FUCKING BULLSHIT
(I can't tell if you're serious so I'll just act like you are)
---
You know what spoonsie, some human rights ARE bullshit. It is a pretty relative statement after all.
We have given a free pass to stupid people for FAR too long. There needs to be some dramatic measures taken to make this world a much better place.
These 'rights' that you mention are not globally recognized or even fully appreciated or enforced here in western civilization.
There needs to be a collective international effort to define and regulate human rights.
Problem is 'we' don't collectively give a shit about much of anything that doesn't directly impact us, or cost us under a dollar a day and some trivial piece of mind.
Submitted by Spooner (user info) at 2006-12-02 16:57:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Because human rights are FUCKING BULLSHIT
(I can't tell if you're serious so I'll just act like you are)
Submitted by chipolatte (user info) at 2006-12-02 16:14:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
"I know that our current systems of government are failing miserably, and we aren't doing anything about it."
um, no...are you talking in context of population control, or in general? actually, you're wrong; China has taken many measure of population control and it has worked very well.
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 16:09:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by thesushiking (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:41:49 (#)
Ranking: 0
ever heard of eugenics?
hitler liked that.
---
Hitler also liked puppies, chocolate ice-cream and the volkswagon bug.
Do you have an actual point to support your lazy rhetorical question?
Submitted by thesushiking (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:41:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
ever heard of eugenics?
hitler liked that.
Submitted by lechuza (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:36:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Number of people in asia = 3,879,000,000
number of asian people in uber = <20
we demand asians now
Submitted by apollo88 (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:29:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
non-random cumulative selection cannot be forced.
Submitted by bob (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:20:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The problem with a disease is that those who die from it cannot be controlled...the only people to survive would be people who are immune by some genetic defect, or have a great immune system.
i think intelligence is more important than a good immune system for our species survival considering that that prefrontal cortex was the main human adaptation for survival.
'cause I'm praying for mayhem
And I'm praying for tidal waves
I wanna see the ground give way
I wanna watch it all go down
Mom please flush it all away
I wanna see it go right in and down
I wanna watch it go right in
Watch you flush it all away
Time to bring it down again
Don't just call me pessimist
Try and read between the lines
I can't imagine why you wouldn't
Welcome any change, my friend
I wanna see it all come down
Suck it down
Flush it down
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 15:02:05 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by LongestPants (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:47:32 (#)
Ranking: -2
Have you ever heard of a man named Hitler?
---
'Glib' is such a difficult thing to pull off. You failed rather miserably with this rhetorical nonsense.
Submitted by LongestPants (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:47:32 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Have you ever heard of a man named Hitler?
Submitted by rob_berg (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:42:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Forced Darwinism?
Perhaps a little extreme. I agree with the notion that elements of our fractured society are certainly failing and that something needs to be done... however you are tipping out at the extreme end of the scale.
I agree that our population is out of control, but I think with a little effort we can utilize and regulate that population far better than we have been.
---
Mandatory sterilization of those with mental illnesses.
Execution for those with mental illnesses will come later, but sterilization seems less radical and will be accepted far before execution, so it's sterilization first to keep them from spreading in the meantime.
---
I think this is a little off the mark. While our tolerance of Mental illness remains absurdly high, there are many wonderful people out there who are highly independent, useful contributors to our patchwork society and typically don't find themselves breeding.
The focus shouldn't be on their steriliization or execution - it should be on their parents.
We need to be far more proactive in isolating the genes that cause these illnesses and truly enforce some sort of Child Reproduction License program that aggressively regulates the sort of offspring that we as a society are creating. IF you chose to let GOD (or whatever higher power that individual has extraneously embraced to offer some sort of spiritual validation) dictate the your match up it must be proven that you can afford the massive finacial burden of this child.
As a society we need to respect free will, but at the same time we need protect the general wellness, prosperity and general effectiveness of our population.
---
Mandatory abortion of children of minors.
Minors can't raise children, let alone support them, so it's mandatory abortion. Any person who shall refuse shall be executed.
---
As part of the CRL Act, no child under the age of 18 may reproduce without sufficient monetary support. If proper funding is not available forced alternatives like adoption or abortion will be in effect. This will be strenuously regulated.
---
Mandatory euthanasia at 70. People are living longer and needing more support, and they take more from the system than they've put in.
---
Disagree.
Optional euthanasia at 70. If you wanna check out, I think 70 is a great age to work towards. There should be no stigma attached, no shame. In fact a government sponsored celebration of life will be available if you decide to take that option.
There will be no more government run or funded extended care home for old folks, however. If they are not able to fully fund their slow deterioration then they will be destroyed.
---
Mandatory execution of the homeless. These people clearly cannot function well enough or support themselves.
---
Disagree.
Homelessness is a failing of society. There should be no homeless. Massive work farms should be in place and vagrancy should be aggressively monitored. If you are without a home, one will be provided to you but you must work. If you refuse to work you will be incarcerated and FORCED to work.
Work Farm duties would include:
- sanitation of city streets
- recycling
- maintenance of 'green space'
---
The population of any countries led by a dictator or communism shall be eliminated.
---
That is just silly, and lazy. Those people are fully functional and deserve a better choice.
Massive education needs to happen across the board, ignorance should not be an excuse for anything. Communist nations exist because our established economic practices fail to accommodate the "poorer" nations. Exploitation is all these financially degenerate countries have to look forward to in our current globalized bullshit. We need to change that.
---
One child per couple. Any other children shall be aborted, and if the abortion is refused, there shall be immediate execution of the family.
---
I agree, there should be a limit of 1. We have established it is our "right" so should never be taken away.
BUT People should be able to have more. This privilege should be extended to those couples that have the financial capacity to fully support more than one child.
Abortion should always be an option but there are waiting lists for people to fill their "1 child" quota.
You can financially profit from the creation of life, but you must be a registered and highly regulated. But lets face it, there are some genetically superior folks out there. We should encourage them to breed.
---
There shall be a breeding license.
---
YES!
---
There shall be immediate execution of criminals who have committed a serious offence. The rehabilitation method clearly does not work, so execution is the best answer in these situations.
---
People who are found guilty of Pedophilia should be put to Death. By public execution. These repulsive degenerate fuckers deserve no mercy and we need to expunge them from humanity.
If you take the life of another human being willfully and without justification (cuz lets face it, some folks deserve to die) then you should be subject to death yourself.
Sometimes execution is the best answer in these situation and that option should ALWAYS be there.
ALSO - I propose an initiative that will see the massive creation of recycling facilities adjoined to all of the prisons and penitentiaries on the planet. We need to put our criminals to hard work, and what better way to repay their debt to society than to participate in an unprecedented colossal recycling program.
One of these days I will write a post on that...
---
There far more methods that I approve of, and should be implemented, but listing them all takes time, and I got bored.
---
What you have done is a good start.
I likes steak.
Submitted by Spooner (user info) at 2006-12-02 14:38:11 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
It's called "Eugenics."
Submitted by scourge (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:56:28 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
annoyed me.
the problem is not overpopulation, it is mis-utilization of resources. this planet could sustain a much larger population than it presently does.
if this is a joke, -2 anyway because i didn't laugh.
Submitted by Amontillado (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:51:25 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:44:19 (#)
Ranking: 2
Careful. You're starting to sound like Right-Wing Jack.
Nature will set things right. It always does.
It's just a matter of time before a little virus comes along that will make AIDS seem like a head cold.
-------------
Perhaps we need another bubonic plague? All of the results with none of the blood on people's hands.
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:51:23 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:44:19 (#)
Ranking: 2
Careful. You're starting to sound like Right-Wing Jack.
Nature will set things right. It always does.
It's just a matter of time before a little virus comes along that will make AIDS seem like a head cold.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope you're right.
Submitted by Jack_McCallum (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:44:19 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Careful. You're starting to sound like Right-Wing Jack.
Nature will set things right. It always does.
It's just a matter of time before a little virus comes along that will make AIDS seem like a head cold.
Submitted by St_Jimmy (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:40:27 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
"There shall be a breeding license."
+2 for this alone. I've been saying that for years.
Submitted by ilikesteak (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:36:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Submitted by PhillipTheGreat (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:23:18 (#)
Ranking: 2
There shall be immediate execution of criminals who have committed a serious offence. The rehabilitation method clearly does not work, so execution is the best answer in these situations.
------------------
On the OTHER hand...
You could let the convicted murders run rampant through the world, and they tooo could help lower our population levels.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But we want the RIGHT people to further populate the earth. They kill for the joy of killing. My way executes the deserving.
Submitted by PhillipTheGreat (user info) at 2006-12-02 13:23:18 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
There shall be immediate execution of criminals who have committed a serious offence. The rehabilitation method clearly does not work, so execution is the best answer in these situations.
------------------
On the OTHER hand...
You could let the convicted murders run rampant through the world, and they tooo could help lower our population levels.
Submitted by d_prime (user info) at 2006-12-02 12:56:47 EST (#)
Ranking: -2
Environmentalism is one giant scam. And the western world is doing fine, really, compared to the rest of history. What the hell is everyone complaining about?
Submitted by GMCrayon (user info) at 2006-12-02 12:28:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I approve of this post
Submitted by gravitas (user info) at 2006-12-02 12:09:49 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
sounds good to me, lets get on it
Submitted by MANICMOTHER (user info) at 2006-12-02 12:06:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
amazing how one post can piss me off so much, joke or not.
Submitted by BobLobla (user info) at 2006-12-02 11:51:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
HA
Submitted by Shlongy (user info) at 2006-12-02 11:27:02 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Kill all stalkers, zit boys, minorities, retards, Trailer Trash, unemployed, fags and that's just for starters.
Submitted by littledan (user info) at 2006-12-02 11:08:47 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
I wish there was a way to implement ideas like this without infuriating the masses.
Submitted by ICO (user info) at 2006-12-02 10:55:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I agree with Circe. The Human race disappearing would be the best thing since Hunter Thompson.
And he died, so what exactly do we have to live for?
Submitted by professorfuckface (user info) at 2006-12-02 10:14:00 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I think we should kill all the bad people
there's like 9000 of them
Submitted by Circe (user info) at 2006-12-02 10:04:26 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
Our population is out of controll and we are almost beyond hope of preserving our planet to continue the propagation of the human race."""
So?
Everything dies out eventually. We will too. No big deal.