Crappy Superbowl Ads - Didn't See That Coming! (694 hits)
Category: SportsRating: 1.12 on 19 reviews (Rate this item) (V)
Submitted by Bob Dole (View user info) at 2007-02-05 07:07:49 EST
For $2.6 million for 30sec or so of airtime at it's peak, you'd have guessed there would be a decent showing of ads.
Instead, we got shit. Worse than shit. Some were amusing, and a few were alright. But gone are the days of the Budweiser Frogs and the Tabasco-mosquito. I didn't even see a Corona ad! Not even Godaddy's recycled cheerleaders could help. Speaking of recycled... why did Blockbuster haul the rabbit and guinea pig out of retirement? And that 'Coke Factory' thing is no less than 5 years old.
So to save everyone the time of watching this crap yourselves http://youtube.com/superbowl here's my short-list of the worst-of-the-worst.
User Reviews
Submitted by St_Jimmy (user info) at 2007-08-18 10:07:20 EDT (#)
Ranking: 2
Tron?
Bob Dole should resolve to post more often.
Submitted by TempermentalTypist (user info) at 2007-02-07 13:17:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
not entirely a surprise. ya rly.
Submitted by TheUniter (user info) at 2007-02-06 01:57:37 EST (#)
Ranking: -1
Submitted by Bob_Dole (user info) at 2007-02-06 00:48:28 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by Quint (user info) at 2007-02-05 22:41:39 (#)
Ranking: 0
The Bud Lite hitch-hiker commercial kicked all kinds of ass.
--------------------
On further review, (and further drinking), I must agree. It was pretty funny. Still not the Bud Frogs, or the Lizards, but still pretty funny.
Submitted by Quint (user info) at 2007-02-05 22:41:39 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
The Bud Lite hitch-hiker commercial kicked all kinds of ass.
Submitted by Jeanneee (user info) at 2007-02-05 22:26:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
I got kind of emo over the GM robot one. Also the one with the dog who wanted to be a dalmatian, I can't remember what it was for though - I was pretty soused at that point.
Submitted by Unabonger (user info) at 2007-02-05 19:34:33 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
indeed.
Submitted by Sinistral (user info) at 2007-02-05 18:47:48 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
That coke commerical has been playing in movie theaters for about a year now.
Submitted by Hookhand (user info) at 2007-02-05 12:37:17 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
It's a sad time to be one of those guys who watches the Superbowl for the commercials
Submitted by JonnyX (user info) at 2007-02-05 12:08:21 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
That Federline one was funny, though
Submitted by icarus1987 (user info) at 2007-02-05 10:54:51 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
effort
Submitted by Foolproof (user info) at 2007-02-05 10:33:36 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
What the fuck is a Superbowl?
Submitted by Amontillado (user info) at 2007-02-05 09:06:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Agreed, they were shit.
Submitted by IntangibleHands (user info) at 2007-02-05 08:45:16 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by tartpumper (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:43:31 (#)
Ranking: 1
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:37:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know what it is, but there's something fundamentally different about the filter or whatever on American cameras to the one on Australian cameras. It just seems less clear.
------------------------------------
You know Ive been asking that question for years and nobody gives me a straight answer. Even when English TV cameras film in America it still has that kind of American fuzziness to it? Anyone know why?
-----------------------------------------
Most other countries film television at about 30 frames per second, whereas American Television is shot at 24 frames per second. I think. It makes a huge difference.
Submitted by Bob_Dole (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:48:15 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:37:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know what it is, but there's something fundamentally different about the filter or whatever on American cameras to the one on Australian cameras. It just seems less clear.
---------------------------
And these images are even crappier--- not only youtube grade video, but screen captured from you tube. We're talking copy of a copy of a copy.
Submitted by tartpumper (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:43:31 EST (#)
Ranking: 1
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:37:03 (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know what it is, but there's something fundamentally different about the filter or whatever on American cameras to the one on Australian cameras. It just seems less clear.
------------------------------------
You know Ive been asking that question for years and nobody gives me a straight answer. Even when English TV cameras film in America it still has that kind of American fuzziness to it? Anyone know why?
And yep adverts in general are gay x 1million. As it says on the link below, for every good advert there is 10 shit ones.
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/discussion/best-worst-tv-adverts/1010846/
Submitted by Maltese (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:37:58 EST (#)
Ranking: 2
AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA B@W
Submitted by thorpe (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:37:03 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
I don't know what it is, but there's something fundamentally different about the filter or whatever on American cameras to the one on Australian cameras. It just seems less clear.
Submitted by HurtByTheSun (user info) at 2007-02-05 07:30:01 EST (#)
Ranking: 0
American advertising has always been bollocks, regardless of when it's aired.