login / register
Conservative? Try reading a little about reality.
Welcome to Ubersite!

RAPE: Then and Now

Submitted by X54 at 2018-09-28 18:28:40 EDT
Rating: -1.67 on 6 ratings (15 reviews) (Review this item) (V)

From Vox: "The rape culture of the 1980s" (https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/9/27/17906644/sixteen-candles-rape-culture-1980s-brett-kavanaugh)

The article is intended to explain why Kavanaugh's accusers didn't come forward at the time of their alleged victimization: to wit, because sexual assault (as we know it today) was often seen as "harmless hijinks" back then, so women complaining about being raped or sexually assaulted by an acquaintance weren't taken seriously.

But couldn't this same argument be used in Kavanaugh's defense? After all, is it fair to judge people in the past by today's values? Sure, it's "rape" or "sexual assault" today, but back then it was just "harmless hijinks." Does this mean I need a crystal ball to see three or four decades into the future in order to know how to behave today? To avoid being accused of bad behavior in 2053?


Review This Item

Rating:

Comment:




Reviews


Submitted by asmasta808 at 2019-02-17 22:22:08 EST (#)
Rating: -2

i prefer goblin slayer's rape. thanks

Submitted by Spam at 2018-12-30 15:35:00 EST (#)
Rating: 0

Submitted by DaBeast at 2018-11-30 22:06:10 GMT (#)

There are guys out there that honestly believe chicks love to be raped and that they all fantasize about it and want it. There are guys out there that think if a chick doesn't like being raped then there's something wrong with HER. When asked how much they enjoy being raped, these same "men" claim that guys don't like being raped because they aren't women.

Those guys were raised by "men" that like to tell sex stories about 14 year old Vietnamese hookers, call their own mothers "whores", and claim that all little girls are "whores" by the age of 9. Those guys don't go into detail about how their daddy molested them when they were children because then they'd have to actually use their brain for a moment and maybe rub two brain cells together to try to spark an actual thought.

Some of those "men" read Ubersite. I put the word "men" in quotation marks because those guys aren't men; they're just testicle hangars with feet.

~~~

You should have just posted a picture of a doll with an arrow showing where "men" touched you. This is a safe space.

Submitted by DaBeast at 2018-11-30 17:06:10 EST (#)

There are guys out there that honestly believe chicks love to be raped and that they all fantasize about it and want it. There are guys out there that think if a chick doesn't like being raped then there's something wrong with HER. When asked how much they enjoy being raped, these same "men" claim that guys don't like being raped because they aren't women.

Those guys were raised by "men" that like to tell sex stories about 14 year old Vietnamese hookers, call their own mothers "whores", and claim that all little girls are "whores" by the age of 9. Those guys don't go into detail about how their daddy molested them when they were children because then they'd have to actually use their brain for a moment and maybe rub two brain cells together to try to spark an actual thought.

Some of those "men" read Ubersite. I put the word "men" in quotation marks because those guys aren't men; they're just testicle hangars with feet.

Bart will know which "men" those guys are - they're the ones that'll be demanding that he remove this comment. *laf*


Submitted by Flack at 2018-11-27 17:00:57 EST (#)

Submitted by bart at 2018-09-28 22:14:35 EDT (#)

Most people act in a way they think is “right” from their own perspective at the time of their actions. This includes the Nazis, ISIS, confederate slaveowners, the Viet Cong, and so on.

The losers of wars and social changes may not necessarily be punished for the behaviors from their past, but that doesn’t mean they get seats on the Supreme Court to decide on the futures of the country.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Easily the most reasonable thing I have read regarding Kavanaugh so far.

Submitted by HotWillie at 2018-11-02 14:31:03 EDT (#)
Rating: -2

STFU

Submitted by Unabonger at 2018-10-29 23:36:46 EDT (#)
Rating: -2

WHAT THE HELL MAN IF THEY COMIN AT YOU

Submitted by Murphy1844 at 2018-10-26 06:10:22 EDT (#)

The argument for this, long past, is who do ya believe? I personally don’t think Kav was on a rape-mission. My guess, given the account from both sides, is that Kav was blackout drunk and thought he was “having a good time.” What this means is what’s important. Was he trying to scare her for his own amusement? Was he following along with the behavior of some other douchebag so he could feel accepted? Yes. I think so.

Was his intention to pin this chick down and stuff his dick in one of three holes choose your own adventure? Probably not.

After reading his op-ed in the Washington Post, and considering the man has zero corraberated offences past this, I think we Americans should give him a pass, lest we become individual judges in the he-said-she-said conflict.

Ford wasn’t lying. Nor was Kav. My guess is he was blacked out and did stupid shit. The very nature of blacking out means you can’t remember anything past a certain point, and generally do stupid shit. But is the guy a rapist? I really don’t think so, because most people like that show a clear and demonstrable history of the ‘ol poke in the hole. He doesn’t.

I’m unclear about his actual policy, but for the sake of decency let’s at least pretend that he’s fair and will thoughtfully consider any judgement he makes, without pressure from the orange-faced turd in charge.

Murphy

Submitted by Hashtag at 2018-10-09 07:56:07 EDT (#)

Rape is only committed by black men.

Submitted by Sage at 2018-10-04 15:58:57 EDT (#)

What ARE this?

Submitted by Perk "Grownman Perkiness" man at 2018-10-02 19:27:49 EDT (#)

I don't trust these hoes.

Submitted by Tormentos at 2018-10-02 16:28:13 EDT (#)

Over the years, Bart's allowed a lot of stories to be hosted on Ubersite that involve rape and violent sexual behaviors. It was a theme here for some time - remember the incessant "Needs More Rape" in the comments of every story? He didn't block or ban them for their content; instead he proffered a platform for them to be hosted, read, commented upon, and linked to the rest of the internet. Is Bart violent or maliciously misogynist because he promoted this? Probably not. But in a few years, when he decides to run for an alderman seat, you can bet someone will dig up every such post that he allowed to exist on the platform that he alone controlled and will use them and his support of them to portray him as exactly that. Will such claims be true? Doesn't matter. Will his wife and kids be by his side at the press conferences, showing support? Surely, and it doesn't matter. Will those who wrote the stories and those who read them speak up for Bart, saying how awesome and cool and completely not sexually violent he is? Maybe, or maybe they'll be afraid to. Again, it doesn't matter. Regardless, after the accusation and spin, the damage will have been done. Bart will deny all the allegations, of course, and will fight to clear his name, but Bart will not be an alderman. People won't vote for someone who thinks that way about women, even if he really doesn't. His businesses will suffer for the notoriety he unjustly receives, his clients thinking it's better to just avoid looking like they're associating with someone who could even be accused of such awful misdeeds. In the end, Bart's actions in the past will be spun heavily against him and then judged out of their proper context. It's not fair, but it's what certainly could be. Maybe Bart won't run for alderman. Nothing to worry about violent misogynist-wise, Bart, as long as you keep your head down.

This has been a work of fiction. But then https://web.archive.org/web/20040621101122/http://www.ubersite.com:80/m/13012 is a thing, so...

Submitted by HurtByTheSun at 2018-10-02 13:07:22 EDT (#)
Rating: -2

The victimless crime.

Submitted by Sacrilicious at 2018-10-01 17:19:31 EDT (#)
Rating: -2

Who is defining rape and sexual assault as "harmless hijinks?" NOT THE VICTIMS. So, society didn't hold people responsible for their actions and victims weren't taken seriously then, so why do it now? For fuck sake.

If you can't tell the difference between whether or not you are raping someone, then stay far away from everyone.

Submitted by StuporDupor at 2018-09-30 16:05:24 EDT (#)

rape has been a crime for centuries you fucknutted philistine.

it was a goddamn crime when judge budweiser climbed on a fifteen year old girl, put one hand over her mouth and used the other to paw at her clothing, and it's a crime today.

regardless, that judge is a fucking retard. he's not fit to adjudicate the difference between your piehole and your bunghole, although admittedly that would be a tough call for solomon himself.
on a lighter note, i see this shithole is still, well, a shithole.

fag below.

Submitted by bart at 2018-09-28 22:14:35 EDT (#)

Most people act in a way they think is “right” from their own perspective at the time of their actions. This includes the Nazis, ISIS, confederate slaveowners, the Viet Cong, and so on.

The losers of wars and social changes may not necessarily be punished for the behaviors from their past, but that doesn’t mean they get seats on the Supreme Court to decide on the futures of the country.


Homer: I'm just a big fool.

Karl: Oh no, you're not!

Homer: How do you know?

Karl: Because my mother taught me never to kiss a fool!

Simpson and Delilah